Laz wrote:
I will openly admit i have a fascination/aspie obsession with warfare, military history and play complex wargames. However, at heart I am a pacifist influenced by what ive read the people ive met and family members who were involved in wars. To be fair im abborent of violencve full stop.
Well, I've read a few books on military matters, and can't resist those History Channel documentaries on various campaigns, or those technical documentaries on stuff like nuclear weapon development. It is fascinating. However, war is a terrible thing — I've no doubt.
There are worse things, though. Like living a life marred by repression and fear, enforced by terror and evil that
is part of the human psyche; which manifests itself where individuals are left to reign unchecked. For that reason, I could never be a pacifist. There must be the threat of violence to maintain freedom; so, to maintain freedom there will always be the need for armies, and weapons, I think. That threat of violence needs to be maintained by the state, in order to protect it's global interests, and by the citizen, also, who should, in a genuinely free country, be able to maintain the means to do away with an authority that acts against the interests of the people.
Although you're a "pacifist at heart", I reckon you probably agree with some of that. Do you?