Callista wrote:
However: Autism is not brain damage because autism is how the brain is from the beginning, due mostly to genetics. A similar example would be Down syndrome, which is also genetic, and also results in a different brain; Down syndrome is also not brain damage.
The significant difference between brain damage and non-typical neurology is that "damage" is something--an injury, an illness--that occurs after the brain has finished most or all of its development; that is, after birth, and especially after age two or three. Autism starts before that (though it's not nearly as easy to detect early on), and almost certainly comes into being directed by the person's genetic makeup. Therefore, it's incorrect to call it "brain damage".
Hear! Hear! My sentiments exactly.
And I feel its worth noting that
NTs is not really a reference to A SPECIFIC GROUP OF PEOPLE. There is no trait or set of traits that are exclusive to
NTs, other than THEY ARE NOT neurologically handicapped. They may have their own myriad quirks and eccentricities, each one wildly different from the other.
How discriminatory is it to refer to 'Us in this room' as differentiated from 'THE REST OF THE FRIGGIN' UNIVERSE'?
When I see a danger of Aspies holding rallies to inter or exterminate all non-Aspies, I'll believe
NT is a term of Hate Speech or discrimination. Until then, its just an 'Us and Them' mentality that is a natural fallout of a lifetime of being bullied and treated as defective. I don't see the point in the endless ideological debate over it.
And yet here I am engaging in it.

Augh! My brain hurts!