Rainbow-Squirrel wrote:
ProfessorAspie wrote:
Rainbow-Squirrel wrote:
anbuend wrote:
I don't need to propose alternate theories to recognize that a theory doesn't work. And that one doesn't work.
but you do have to prove that it doesn't work.
not really. It really isn't an accepted scientific model anymore.
By who ?
most researchers who work at trying to understand the brain. The models are just a bit too simple, and while some of them fit what we know, most of them (speaking mostly of the psychosexual stuff here) just haven't been borne out by a lot of work.
That said, if it is a model for self understanding for you, and it works for you, I have no data that can invalidate your personal experience.
anbuend wrote:
Actually, proponents of such views are the ones who have to provide proof. (And simply saying that areas of the brain map directly onto these ideas isn't proof. The fact that there are aspects of cognition we are unaware of does not prove they are the same as the psychoanalytic (whether Freudian or otherwise) notion of the unconscious.
largely agree. I am something of an outlier among my colleagues in that I don't think that the distiction made by modern physiologists of unconscious drives over and against "subconscious" drives is entirely meaningful. But I think, on balance our views coincide.
Quote:
I was diagnosed while there were still more psychoanalytic views of autism than most people realize (the nineties). After transfer to a psychoanalytic facility they took a leaf straight out of Frances Tustin's book and described me as an infantile psychotic caused by my mothers behavior when I was a baby.
The cold mother theory? What a horror show that must have been.