ThomasL wrote:
Psychopompos wrote:
It was technically impossible. In 1945 USA had only two bombs and wouldn't have enough time to build enough bombs to destroy USSR.
Well, I can see from your avatar that you admire the Russkies, but are you sure? The US had a 4-year window of opportunity to produce a few more bombs (1945 - 1949, when the Russians got their own). I really don't think that was the problem. It didn't take 4 years to produce the 2 bombs we used against Japan, and anyway, at that point we knew exactly how to do it, so just make more - should be much faster. Right?
I made a slight - and common - mistake. To be more precise, there was three bombs : the two which exploded in Japan and
one which was tested in the USA a few weeks before. I could be important to know : they were two kinds of bombs (the first was like the Nagasaki one, the Hiroshima one was a different kind - on which the development was later focused).
I don't know how many times does take the building of one "Little Boy" atomic bomb when you already know how to build it, but keep in mind that USSR is very very wide... I know that nuking each yard of Soviet ground isn't the point

but, even if USA could build enough bombs to do this, how to carry them ? They would need :
- enough bombers for the A-bombs
- enough fighters to escort them
- enough bombers for ground attacks (destroying Soviet flak)
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w_d7wa0cxDU[/youtube]
I don't know a lot about military aviation but ask myself... Do you think an US heavy bomber taking off in West-Germany or in Alaska would have enough fuel to reach a strategic target located deeply in Russia ? Not talking about its flying escort.
_________________
Alum dare, dolere, id Hephaestus, id ire / Pro profundis fati / Pro pulchris infernarum profundis / Pro pulchris omni fati brachium / Pulchris profundis infernarum servi fati / Profundis, profundis fati