Quote:
But I think NTs (and I am one) see clothes and appearance as a form of non-verbal communication. The way you look is meant to communicate things about yourself. This doesn't mean always adhereing to conventions. But it does mean pretty much constantly "translating" what a person looks like into information about that person. The term "fashion statement" should be taken literally. It means that whatever a person has chosen to put on is meant to be understood as a statement they are making about themselves. Purposely trying to not wear the recent fashionable thing is a pretty blatant statement.
Fascinating. That (unsurprisingly) never occurred to me. Inconvenient for aspie-like peoples, as we don't seem to register the carefully encoded messages we're supposed to be portraying just because we like the T-shirt we're wearing.
I don't understand fashion at all. I have always been on the low-class side, so if I have clothing that's appropriate to the weather, that's enough for me. I don't understand the apparently inherent status imbedded in brand names clothes - I simply see it as giving the company free advertising which seems kind of pointless, plus having to pay easily three or four times the price for an item that serves the same function. Take today for example - it's freezing. It's winter. I went to a shopping centre to buy a fleecy hoodie. Brand name hoodies such as Adidas or Slazenger or whatever were $99.98. A plain blue hoodie from Big W however was $10. They do exactly the same thing. Just one has a word on it and one doesn't. Complete mystery.
As far as clothing goes, I simply shoot for neutral. I don't identify with any gender or sexuality (the ultimate grey man - an asexual androgeyne) so I try to keep my clothing away from giving the message that I'm male, female, heterosexual, homosexual, or anything close. Maybe that's a statement, I don't know.