rdos wrote:
First - Aspies are not inferior because of neanderthal inheritance because neanderthals were not inferior. It is not necesarily true that the smartest "species" survives as they mix in a novel habitat. It could just as well be the species that reproduces most, doesn't care about ecology (lots of extinctions in the back-waters of Hs "colonization).
As for mtDNA, it is one haplotype, and doesn't say much if anything about the rest of the genome. The mtDNA might be under selective pressure too.
Right RDOS! Neanderthals were not inferior, only maybe in tenacity for breeding large populations.
It's sick how much of that article relates to the characteristics of both me and my 5 year old son.
Science, as per the status quo, is steeped in as much dogma as religions. There are so many peers that are hard to sway with new evidence or theories. Just remember how long it took for Homo Florensis to be accepted as a hobbit sized human. I think the Neanderthal genome project will open up many questions that will quickly deliver answers.
BTW - I started blonde, but my hair by 11 was about the same color as the Neanderthal child in the pic. My eyes are a chameleonic gray-green-blue. I'm not as fair as some, but had I avoided sun all my life I would have been (my skin under clothes rapidly returns to milky pink). I have a slightly sloping chin, and somewhat of a John C. Reilly, Matt Damon, divided crested brow.