kfisherx wrote:
??? How can this possibly be illegal or even unethicall???
She has a right to refuse service just as you have a right to fire her.
I knew of a hospital doctor who would tell his patients to stop smoking, and he refused to see the ones who didn't obey him in that respect. He would make quite a fuss about it, as if deliberately trying to punish them. I don't approve of his stand, because people get addicted to things, and I feel it's a doctor's duty to work with what he has. In the same hospital, a woman was repeatedly warned to stop getting pregnant (because every time she did, it went wrong and they feared another pregnancy would kill her) - she paid no heed, but was never turned away for treatment, and her difficulty in co-operating with their advice eventually killed her. I don't see anything different about the smoking thing. In cases where the doc feels unable to continue with a patient, I feel the doc should find them another doc, so that the patient doesn't feel like they've been left alone with their problems.
But I think they threw out the Hippocratic Oath a while back. That was probably the source of the ethic. I don't know if it's ever been applied to shrinks. As for the OP's case, I really don't know, because I don't know how difficult it is to stop watching this violent material, or whether or not the shrink is right to think that's the problem, or whether or not the shrink is trying to use fear (of being left without support) as a lever. There are bound to be cases where a health professional feels they aren't competent to continue treating a patient, but failure to carry out advice shouldn't count unless it's extreme - a bit of hurt pride that the patient has a mind of their own shouldn't faze the doc so much that they can't continue, unless their ego is so delicate as to make them unsuitable for working with people.