Verdandi wrote:
aspi-rant wrote:
but...
the point is, that in the baron-cohen test (as it is!!), the women's scores lean toward empathizing and men towards systemizing... and aspies (both men and woman) lean towards systemizing....
even enough to give it a statistic significancy.... that can rule out the option of being an aspie if one scores lower than a certain threshold.
Yes, but the point is that the leap from that to "extreme male brain" makes no sense. It simply means ASD brains instead of neurotypical brains. And it doesn't address how much of that is socialization versus neurology.
Not only that, but Baron-Cohen's tests are designed to get certain results. It's hard to explain, but I could see it the moment that I saw the tests being used. Scoring a certain way on these tests does not say anything about the maleness or the femaleness of a person's brain. It doesn't necessarily say anything about a person's brain
at all. And it doesn't necessarily show whether a person is "empathizing" or "systemizing"
at all. It takes a
lot of assumptions (and Baron-Cohen is really good at manipulating people's assumptions about the world) to go from someone scoring a certain way on these tests, to the person being good at an abstract concept like empathizing or systemizing, to the idea that a person's score on these tests reflects these specific skills
in their brain, to the concept that scores on these tests reflect
male and female brains. But most people seem to just follow along without questioning a single word of it, and that disturbs me greatly.
And yes, I've read the book he wrote on this topic. I can't remember what it was called. It was very difficult to slog through. And it was very slick with the assumptions being made that most people wouldn't question because of the way he wrote about them. There's a certain way of forming words, that makes it so that a person can embed multiple layers of assumptions behind the words they write,
and yet if they write it using certain forms of words, then people will not only not question the assumptions, but take those assumptions on board in their own brain without realizing it. Baron-Cohen is a master of that kind of writing. I find it very disturbing how few people seem to notice or question this.
_________________
"In my world it's a place of patterns and feel. In my world it's a haven for what is real. It's my world, nobody can steal it, but people like me, we live in the shadows." -Donna Williams