lostonearth35 wrote:
Do the "celebrities" have to be real or human? When I was a teen while other girls were acting like lunatics over NKOTB, I was obsessed with Garfield the Cat. I had posters and plushies and books of him all over my room. I draw cartoons myself and back then I didn't care about much about anything that wasn't out of a cartoon or comic strip. Today I think nearly all human "celebrities" have nothing I want to celebrate about, they are drug addicts, nymphos, liars, cheaters, adulterers, anorexic, bulimic horrible role models, and have no real talent.
It's disgusting and utterly shameful and I weep for the world.

Perhaps I am being a hypocrite because I was/still am the exact same way with Timon from The Lion King. Recently, it's switched to Tails the fox/kitsune, Sonic the hedgehog and Sally Acorn. As I said, if they were real creatures, I'd probably just adopt them as my pets. I don't craw all over myself when I watch Lion King or Sonic SatAM. I always perfered cartoon animals to real life people. I feel so deprived not knowing about Sonic SatAM as a kid. I would have loved Sally. Not only because she was a talking animal, but because she isn't the sterotypical prissy, girly girl princess and isn't always protrayed as the damsel in distress or a bumbling bimbo as most female characters tend to be. But then my special intrest would probably be chipmunks instead of meerkats.
_________________
Spell meerkat with a C, and I will bite you.