littlelily613 wrote:
I think a comment like "aspies like horror books" is about as valid as "brunettes like horror books". All people on the spectrum are individuals. All like and dislike different things. Some like things that others of us hate and vice versa. I am actually terrified of horror movies. I get creeped out even by scary commercials. I think this is just an individual taste, not something related to the spectrum at all. Even common likes such as trains can still not be generalized to encompass all people on the spectrum. Some Aspies, I'm sure, likely hate trains.
I agree with this. It's sort of like how men are said not to like reading fiction, and if they do read they're supposed to like reading action/mystery stuff. There may be a
trend of Aspies tending to like or not like certain things, but people should really take it for what it is: a trend and not a diagnostic criteria.
I love horror movies, but I don't think I've seen really good one in a long while. I've seen some decent ones (Martyrs, Whispering Corridors series, Cube, Aliens) but generally I find that horror movies disappoint. They're just not scary. The ones with the jumpy scare tactics have no atmosphere and horrible stories, but the ones with atmosphere and good stories never seem to be able to breach that line between simply "unsettling" to truly horrific.
I think if I had to point out one great example of horror, I'd point to Cronenburg's The Fly. The actors are a bit stereotypical (I really don't like the main female lead), but the whole movie in general is good. The "scenes of normalcy" before everything goes nuts don't make me want to bite off my own fingers. I HATE "scenes of normalcy" in horror movies. I don't want to sit around watching people stupidly fall in lust and have sex all over the place just so we can establish some contrast in the film. I don't want to watch them have breakfast and say goodbye to little Johnny as he gets on the school bus either. I HATE those scenes. But The Fly doesn't drag horribly like most horror films do. I don't get the urge to skip scenes (except for the sex scenes).
And let's look at the most important thing: the movie was made 25 years ago and it STILL has the power to disturb. The special effects were so well-handled they hold up today. I honestly don't think modern technology could improve it much. The final transformation at the end might have some room for CG help, specifically in making the creature more mobile and perhaps more detailed than rubbery, but given that it's a scientific monstrosity and not an evolutionary adept perfect killer, it's in many ways perfect as it is. And everything before that (in terms of horror scenes) are pretty much golden. They're strong, solid scenes with a real ability to disturb that technology couldn't improve upon.
Hey, Stephen King fans out there: tell me one of you has seen Creepshow.