Person-First Language
Anyway, that's the way it is with me. I have to be careful to speak accurately in connotative as well as denotative meaning; thankfully I have a big vocabulary and can usually pick the word with the right connotation. It's actually quite fun and challenging to get JUST the right word.
The people with the disorder I was alluding to can also intellectually decipher the connotation of a word, but to them it's just another fact like the measurements of a room. Because they do not truly feel the emotional nuance they attempt to convey, their emotional state is considered shallow (yes, that is the psychiatric term for it: shallow affect). Psychologists have measured this emotional word processing deficit by measuring how fast they respond to emotional words compared to neutral ones (normals respond to emotional words faster); they respond equally as fast to both types of words. They are also found not to be distracted by periphery stimuli in word-naming tests. The disorder I am referring to is psychopathy. (I do not know if similar tests have been performed on people on the autistic spectrum.)
To me, a home is any place intended for a person to live in. Real estate agents sell homes because they sell places intended for people to live in. A house is a specific type of residence; apartments, condominiums, duplexes, lofts, and other types of residence can be homes as well. Of course, I suppose not all houses are homes if they are in such a state of disrepair that they can no longer safely or comfortably have someone live inside. Home, of course, also has that second emotional connotation of that place place where ,b]I[/b] live; a new house may not "feel like home" for a while. I would say this emotional connotation is not the only accurate usage of home, however.
I seem to have a natural ability to use emotion-generating words in my speech and writing. It can make conversation a little more interesting, but this can lead to a tendency to use exaggerated words and scenarios to keep myself amused while talking. I don't know how many other aspies are like this.
I stand in two worlds with repect to this.
I CAN feel the emotional nuance on many words, but I dislike it. I do my very best to distance myself from it until I can evaluate whether the connotation, the emotion being "pushed", is fair. If this requires me to deliberately take time out from listening to consider, I will do it.
This is not because emotions can't influence me, but because I know very well they can.
Without my consent, if I'm not careful.
I also tend to strip the emotional connotations from a word to look at it objectively and found most connotations to be illogical and destructive (for example the negative connotations associated with "communism" due to the cold war/world war 2 causes the majority of the population to fail to understand the concept or acknowledge its positive usages and necessity in the healthy functioning of all societies).
As for "Person with autism" versus "autistic person" I prefer the latter.
Personally I take offense to being called a person with autism like its something seperate from me and that they expect me to support them when they want to remove it.
Basically there is no such thing as a person with autism. If you remove the autism you remove the person. The two things are inseperable.
In this case the person is defined by being autistic just as much as they are defined by their gender or race or the color of their hair.
_________________
One pill makes you larger
And one pill makes you small
And the ones that mother gives you
Don't do anything at all
-----------
"White Rabbit" - Jefferson Airplane
*raises hand and waves it around*
I always thought this ability came from reading too much - too fast - too young...?
