Dart wrote:
Quote:
Don't you guys just LOVE people like dart?(sarc)
I know. I love people like me too.
Just joking. In all seriousness, though, I didn't mean any offense. I was trying to illustrate that we all have our strengths and weaknesses, and different ones at that. I'm absolutely horrible at science, which I bet many of you in this topic are good at.
You're right about that! I AM better at other disciplines. I guess you're right. It IS a good idea to show that being AS doesn't necessarily mean bad at math. Frankly, I think it has more to do with the education system. I DID give percentages and "estimates" that were pretty good earlier, so I know I used to be good at math. I quoted estimates because I would take them down to like the second, etc... instead of rounding to 5 or 10 like everyone else. People used to get a kick out of it.
With regards to getting better at math etc... Some might want to check out "speed mathematics using the vedic system by vali masser" and "Speed mathematics by bill handley". BOTH are easily available from amazon, and are cheap. Hey, they DO simplify it, and are geared towards mental math. If you are teaching a kid, it will show you what you need to cover. I wish I had this when I was a kid, I would have been at highschool level within a year. The speed mathematics one is deceptively small(113 pages). It covers probably all the basic math, including fractions, powers(squary and cube), and roots(square and cube), basic algebra, and various conversions. I includes even finding the area of triangles, circles, and spheres.
People like dart may laugh, and frankly conventional methods ARE more flexible(but often slower and harder to do mentally).
Steve