Aspergers still exists
aaronzx
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Joined: 21 Nov 2013
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 66
Location: Australia
I have read up some more on this. It's quite ironic that ASD is becoming a special interest of mine.
I'm only new to the discussion but yes, to be totally honest, I do fear what you are suggesting. However, I don't actually believe there are any significant neurological differences between those on the spectrum. Though it cannot be argued, some people do indeed have more neurological functionality than others, unfortunately.
I don't believe there should be a dichotomy between those with low function and those with high function. Although I am selfishly afraid of the consequences that come with dropping the identifiers of 'Aspergers' and 'high functioning'.
I don't think you need to be afraid. i think it'll make it a little easier for us to get services when we need them. Plus, if you put the Aspies into a larger group, that'll make it harder for people to ignore the skills and talents that other autistics have, because suddenly they're part of the same group as the nerdy engineer who sucks at social stuff but really gets computers. It gets rid of the stereotype that says, "Aspies don't need help; auties can't do anything." Because now they have to wait until they actually meet us to decide. And maybe we'll get help, and get more opportunities, when we couldn't get those things before. At least I hope so.
I remember when I first started studying autism in general, not just Asperger's, and how I realized I had much more in common than not with people they called "low-functioning". If I'd never realized that, I probably would never have realized just how much I could learn about myself, just how many little tricks and tips I could pick up from people who are supposed to be totally unlike me just because I can talk. In reality, there's a lot both of those previously separated groups can learn from one another; now that we have the same label, maybe it'll occur to more of us to try it.
_________________
Reports from a Resident Alien:
http://chaoticidealism.livejournal.com
Autism Memorial:
http://autism-memorial.livejournal.com
ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 68
Gender: Male
Posts: 39,637
Location: Long Island, New York
I remember when I first started studying autism in general, not just Asperger's, and how I realized I had much more in common than not with people they called "low-functioning". If I'd never realized that, I probably would never have realized just how much I could learn about myself, just how many little tricks and tips I could pick up from people who are supposed to be totally unlike me just because I can talk. In reality, there's a lot both of those previously separated groups can learn from one another; now that we have the same label, maybe it'll occur to more of us to try it.
People are going to stereotype no matter what the facts are or what re branding is done. It is human nature to fear the unknown. People on the spectrum are that way also although because of there own experiences many will try harder to overcome it. Considering the types of services being offered and that most of the research money is going to "eradicate" us sometimes I wonder if doing nothing as horrible as it is, is the better option
_________________
“Self Acceptance is a process not a performance”
“You are autistic enough. And you always have been”
Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity.
If you're right and we can't stop the big autism "charities" like Autism Speaks, that doesn't mean we can't help individuals, small groups, and the adults that Autism Speaks has discarded because they're not cute enough. All those people that fall between the cracks. All the kids whose parents don't want Autism Speaks to brand them as tragic burdens. Doing nothing would be giving up a lot of opportunities.
_________________
Reports from a Resident Alien:
http://chaoticidealism.livejournal.com
Autism Memorial:
http://autism-memorial.livejournal.com
It's not about high-functioning people not wanting to be grouped with Rain Man... It's about medical professionals who may or may not be willing to see the ones who aren't. The medical profession is quick enough to dismiss higher functioning people even with a separate "box" to put them in. Without that, they will be much more reluctant do diagnose someone. I have no problem being diagnosed as autistic. I have no problem with my son being diagnosed as such. As long as someone actually will. He needs help, and this lessens the chance that he will actually get it.
That's a valid point, however, consider that many higher functioning folk only choose to get diagnosed in adulthood to explain social deficits in their earlier childhood which were mistakenly identified as shyness, or social awkwardness by their GP, teachers and parents. In these instances you can't blame the medicos as they only have self-report checklists to work with.
That's why I don't bother with getting a formal diagnosis as I don't want to pay somebody to tell me what I already know,
