wozeree wrote:
I was reading skibum's thread about Jane Austin and thinking about how if there is a hell, it really shouldn't be fire because that's overkill. I mean if you're burning up all the time, all you'll ever be able to think about is that, how would you even be able to regret your sins (since that's the whole purpose)?
I think for me, hell would be good punishment if I was forced to participate in normal, nonautistic type things.
Always having another person in close proximity to me.
Having to watch a lot of Oprah.
Never being able to write or draw to express my feelings, it always has to be done verbally.
Never being allowed to read anything but Twilight, 50 Shades of Grey, and of course Jane Austen.
Have to go to big party once a week.
There's more, but that right there would be enough to make me miserable, but still allow me to reflect on whatever I was supposed to be reflecting on. Maybe I shouldn't write this, the big guy upstairs (if he exists) might get some ideas!
What would be your hell?
I groove to the ideas presented in the "Inferno" of Dante's
Divine Comedy (comedy in the sense of "happy ending," because Dante gets to finally spend eternity in Heaven with his beloved). The worst prison in the Nine Hells is reserved for traitors (Satan himself, Judas Iscariot, Vidkun Quisling, Guy Fawkes, Benedict Arnold, and the like), and the sinners condemned there are frozen in ice. Frozen, because treason is the betrayal of all human warmth.
Part of our fascination with various images of Hell is imagining how notorious wrongdoers would finally be held to account for their misdeeds; the images of exquisite punishment in Tartarus from Greco-Roman mythology (Sisyphus forced to try to roll a boulder to the top of a hill only to find that it never will stay where it belongs, Tantalus condemned to never eat food or drink water that is always just out of reach, and so on) are particularly inspiring in this regard.