Page 2 of 2 [ 24 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

TG
Toucan
Toucan

User avatar

Joined: 30 Dec 2006
Gender: Female
Posts: 284
Location: The mighty rivers of BC

27 Feb 2007, 10:07 pm

How about we call ourselves normal and label NT's with a syndrome?
Any suggestions?


_________________
There are no stupid questions?


ZanneMarie
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Jan 2007
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,324

27 Feb 2007, 10:21 pm

OE Over Emoters



TG
Toucan
Toucan

User avatar

Joined: 30 Dec 2006
Gender: Female
Posts: 284
Location: The mighty rivers of BC

27 Feb 2007, 10:28 pm

HAHAHA!! !
That's exactly what I was thinking!!


_________________
There are no stupid questions?


anbuend
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Jul 2004
Age: 44
Gender: Female
Posts: 5,039

27 Feb 2007, 11:03 pm

ARW_AS wrote:
Unlike most 'ret*ds', we're actually eloquent enough to voice our concern and disgust at the way we at times are viewed by people and the media (I wonder if the coverage you guys get in the US will ever creep over here?); and so therefore they presume us to be 'fakers' or normal'. Riles me up. Just because some people are diagnosed incorrectly, doesn't mean EVERYONE has been.


The same thing happens to the people you are calling 'ret*ds' when they try to speak up for themselves as a group. Which they are quite capable of doing and do often.


_________________
"In my world it's a place of patterns and feel. In my world it's a haven for what is real. It's my world, nobody can steal it, but people like me, we live in the shadows." -Donna Williams


janicka
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Sep 2006
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,911
Location: Mountain Paradise

27 Feb 2007, 11:48 pm

TG wrote:
How about we call ourselves normal and label NT's with a syndrome?
Any suggestions?


Neurotypical disorder has already been defined. See http://isnt.autistics.org/



GoatOnFire
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Feb 2007
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,986
Location: Den of the ecdysiasts

28 Feb 2007, 12:16 am

Wow, that looks like something I would have written. The only miss was that he used the still commonly used 19th century belief that bigger brains mean smarter (they don't, that's phrenology). Should've talked more about how people suffering from NT Syndrome heads are sometimes bloated by hot air.



Aspiegirl89
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 5 Feb 2007
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 410
Location: Belfast, Ireland

28 Feb 2007, 12:35 am

snake321 wrote:
I also wann add, we should come up with a new word other than Asperger **Syndrome**. Syndrome implies that we're a burden or a disease. I'd prefer to call myself Aspergian.


Yup, I'm aspergian or aspie... ;^)... or if I'm in an especially prideful mood, autistic. ;^) Lay it out like it's meant to be...


_________________
"ASPIES UNITE!! Oh, right...like we're gonna hold hands." -- T-Shirt design from AutismVox


ARW_AS
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

User avatar

Joined: 21 Mar 2006
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 221
Location: Aberdeen, Scotland

28 Feb 2007, 7:35 am

janicka wrote:
ARW_AS wrote:
Tom Cruise - SUCH a bad man! SO HORRID!


Does he actually believe in that Scientology s**t or is he getting money out of it?


Bit of both most likely

anbuend wrote:
ARW_AS wrote:
Unlike most 'ret*ds', we're actually eloquent enough to voice our concern and disgust at the way we at times are viewed by people and the media (I wonder if the coverage you guys get in the US will ever creep over here?); and so therefore they presume us to be 'fakers' or normal'. Riles me up. Just because some people are diagnosed incorrectly, doesn't mean EVERYONE has been.


The same thing happens to the people you are calling 'ret*ds' when they try to speak up for themselves as a group. Which they are quite capable of doing and do often.


Hence why I put it in quotations - it's a harsh term I don't personally use or believe in myself. I meant severely disabled (people that can't talk and whatnot) before you start jumping down my throat. A nitpicker if I've ever seen one.