Page 2 of 4 [ 50 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

Skurvey
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

User avatar

Joined: 21 Aug 2014
Age: 57
Gender: Male
Posts: 204
Location: Northern Regional NSW

09 Sep 2014, 3:46 am

I really love your analogy with the computer.

I do not like to multitask as nothing gets done properly, I get angry and in a tizz. Having a conversation on the phone while shopping would be terrible. I certainly never do that. Shops are stressy enough at the best of times.

I think perhaps that women are better at multitasking than men - women can work and gossip, but men definitely need to down tools to gossip!! !


_________________
"For he that does good, having the unlimited power to do evil deserves praise not only for the good which he performs, but for the evil which he forbears."
(W Scott)


babybird
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Nov 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 96,102
Location: UK

09 Sep 2014, 4:08 am

I can't concentrate on more than one thing at a time.


_________________
we have existence


DreamingCloud7
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 30 Aug 2014
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 56
Location: New Zealand

09 Sep 2014, 4:58 am

I sure can't, if I try it doesn't end well.



peterd
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Dec 2006
Age: 73
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,374

09 Sep 2014, 5:19 am

Like someone back there said, no one can multitask, it's all about switching. There's room for technique to help, but as an aspie you're handicapped



Ron5442
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 6 Nov 2013
Age: 71
Gender: Male
Posts: 62

09 Sep 2014, 12:14 pm

I've learned to do multitasking; but, I'm not good at it, I don't like it and it's all coping mechanism. At work, whenever I get a new task, I write it down on the steno pad I always keep with me. I've trained myself to look at the pad whenever I'm distracted from my current task. Sometimes they want me to interrupt my work every 15 minutes to check for a problem; but, spend the rest of my time on my main project. I found a timer app for my phone that will give me an alarm every 15min (or however long). It's the only way I can do that. What really screws me up is when I get several tasks or interruptions so fast that I can't write them down.
I keep a separate list for personal tasks.



WellThatsDantastic
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 23 Jul 2013
Gender: Female
Posts: 72

09 Sep 2014, 12:41 pm

I can actually multitask very well.

I feel more productive and I do better when I multitask.



eggheadjr
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Oct 2012
Age: 60
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 1,371
Location: Ottawa, Canada

09 Sep 2014, 12:49 pm

babybird wrote:
I can't concentrate on more than one thing at a time.


Me neither - if I try to I just end up messing everything up.


_________________
Diagnosed Asperger's


DevilKisses
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Jul 2010
Age: 30
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,067
Location: Canada

09 Sep 2014, 1:03 pm

I can multitask as long as I'm not doing anything too difficult. I sometimes need to multitask to be able to focus.


_________________
Your neurodiverse (Aspie) score: 82 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 124 of 200
You are very likely neurotypical


MehruneMath
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 8 Sep 2014
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 61
Location: Boston, MA

09 Sep 2014, 1:40 pm

Yes I can multitask; I work much more efficiently at a single task though.



eric76
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Aug 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,660
Location: In the heart of the dust bowl

09 Sep 2014, 2:44 pm

My company has two product lines and I'm heavily involved with both. One product line is growing and one is shrinking. Working on both of them causes serious problems as a result of multitasking issues and both lines suffer as a result.

Effective at the end of this year, the line that is shrinking will be permanently discontinued. It will actually help since for the last three or four years, the product line cost more to do than it brings in. The line that is growing has been subsidizing the one that is shrinking.

One nice thing about it is that the one that is growing demands less of my time than the one that is shrinking. I'll be able to do much of my work from home and may not even have to go to the office most days.

The best part is that the shrinking line has a potentially enormous liability. Removing that potential liability will definitely help. As it stands now, for the $3,000 or so per year that the product will bring in this year, there is a potential liability of hundreds of thousands of dollars per customer. The product line that is growing has very few potential liability problems.



B19
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Jan 2013
Gender: Female
Posts: 9,993
Location: New Zealand

09 Sep 2014, 3:18 pm

A while ago, Dr Oz interviewed a researcher who specializes in cognitive psychology, who said that multi-tasking is in fact very rare - almost no-one can do it, though many people say or believe that they can.

However inherent in the issue must be the fact of how you define multi-tasking (I don't know how the researcher defined it). For example, I can drive, I am quite a good driver, and that seems to require a degree of multi-tasking (having to attend to more than one action simultaneously).

I wonder why this term even cropped up though - we never heard of it years ago, then suddenly all sorts of people were bragging that they could multi-task - as though that made them superior somehow. It seemed to be just some new thing for people to attach their ego to - does anyone know how it began?

Overall, I think it is pretty meaningless, will be glad when it drops out of use.



auntblabby
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 115,251
Location: the island of defective toy santas

09 Sep 2014, 3:38 pm

B19 wrote:
A while ago, Dr Oz interviewed a researcher who specializes in cognitive psychology, who said that multi-tasking is in fact very rare - almost no-one can do it, though many people say or believe that they can. However inherent in the issue must be the fact of how you define multi-tasking (I don't know how the researcher defined it). For example, I can drive, I am quite a good driver, and that seems to require a degree of multi-tasking (having to attend to more than one action simultaneously). I wonder why this term even cropped up though - we never heard of it years ago, then suddenly all sorts of people were bragging that they could multi-task - as though that made them superior somehow. It seemed to be just some new thing for people to attach their ego to - does anyone know how it began? Overall, I think it is pretty meaningless, will be glad when it drops out of use.

as long as human nature remains what it is [a bunch of competitive upright apes with ape baggage] nothing will change.



eric76
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Aug 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,660
Location: In the heart of the dust bowl

09 Sep 2014, 3:40 pm

What I was thinking about in multitasking was having multiple tasks to do but only doing one at a time.

I don't switch tasks very readily. Some people can switch back and forth pretty quickly. In general, I agree with the previous poster, B19, that very few people can actually do two things at once unless those actions are pretty automatic.



auntblabby
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 115,251
Location: the island of defective toy santas

09 Sep 2014, 3:42 pm

WellThatsDantastic wrote:
I can actually multitask very well. I feel more productive and I do better when I multitask.

I would bet good money that you 1]have well above average IQ, and that 2] you are multilingual. there was a recent study [heard about it on NPR] which compared neural efficiency between multilingual versus monolingual people, and the former group beat the latter group hands down. it seems there is a link between [measurable] intelligence/cognitive efficiency and things like being able to multitask, and speaking another language is one type of multitasking because one has to grok both the other language as well as the existing English context. people with high intelligence can do these things effortlessly.



eric76
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Aug 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,660
Location: In the heart of the dust bowl

09 Sep 2014, 3:44 pm

I always figure that multitasking is about like consciously trying not to think of an elephant at any time in the next five minutes.



auntblabby
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 115,251
Location: the island of defective toy santas

09 Sep 2014, 3:45 pm

eric76 wrote:
What I was thinking about in multitasking was having multiple tasks to do but only doing one at a time.

I don't switch tasks very readily. Some people can switch back and forth pretty quickly. In general, I agree with the previous poster, B19, that very few people can actually do two things at once unless those actions are pretty automatic.

watching a good drummer or organist convinced me early-on, that multitasking does exist and that musicians and athletes are at the head of the pack for such. playing either of those instruments well REQUIRES multitasking and not mere multithreading [which is itself a tall order for a lot of us].