Page 2 of 3 [ 36 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

babybird
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Nov 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 96,102
Location: UK

21 Sep 2014, 11:39 am

Great thread Glider18 :wtg:


_________________
we have existence


dianthus
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 25 Nov 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,138

21 Sep 2014, 11:55 am

jbw wrote:
While I take care to show respect, I don't think I am capable of showing deference, i.e. humble submission. The former relates to abilities, qualities, achievements, wishes, and rights, while latter relates to submission to an arbitrary authority in terms of some notion of social rank.

Correct me if I am wrong, but I get the impression that many of us have a sense of fairness that is compatible with the philosophy of anarchism (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchism), specifically the rejection of any hierarchical form of social organisation.

Anyone with a non-hierarchical value system will fail at showing genuine deference and any attempts at mimicking deference for pragmatic purposes are likely to be picked up subconsciously as fake by the neurotypical social perceptive filters ? and the uncanny valley effect kicks in.

The aspect of deference is probably exactly the aspect that many teachers place great emphasis on. Additionally, in our childhood many of us will have experienced situations where we knew much more about a particular topic than our teacher. Then also genuine respect goes out the window, especially if the teacher tries to maintain a facade of authority even if alerted to errors or significant gaps in knowledge.

Autistics are true experts in falling out of favour with official "authorities". Note, I can't even bring myself to use the "a" word without quotes ;-)


Exactly. All of this is true for me anyway. I think this is why I seem to just have a natural talent for making people angry. They expect deference. I think some people actually want others to fear them, not just defer to them.

I don't believe I should have to show respect for anyone just based on their social position or job position or rank. I have a basic sense of respect for anyone just because they are human but beyond that they have to earn it.



little_blue_jay
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2014
Age: 49
Gender: Female
Posts: 421
Location: Ontario, Canada

21 Sep 2014, 6:12 pm

I felt like Student E at the coffee shop where I used to work.

I would constantly get in trouble for things that others in there would get away with.

We weren't supposed to have drinks (like a cup of water, not necessarily a can of pop, etc.) out front and I'd nearly always catch heck for having a cup of water at my work station (I have POTS and you have to stay plenty hydrated or your BP plummets) and yet a handful of the day-shifters when I came in all had conspicuous cups of water and even large, handled travel mugs with juice sitting right there at the drive-thru area 8O Ummmm no - if a rule applies, it should apply to everyone, no playing favourites, the same action should result in the same consequences :x

G*d people in there would tick me off.


_________________
Diagnosed "Asperger's to a moderate degree" April 7, 2015.
Aspie score 145 of 200
NT score 56 of 200
AQ score: 47
RAADS-R score: 196


little_blue_jay
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2014
Age: 49
Gender: Female
Posts: 421
Location: Ontario, Canada

21 Sep 2014, 6:16 pm

dianthus wrote:

I don't believe I should have to show respect for anyone just based on their social position or job position or rank. I have a basic sense of respect for anyone just because they are human but beyond that they have to earn it.


Agreed :thumleft:


_________________
Diagnosed "Asperger's to a moderate degree" April 7, 2015.
Aspie score 145 of 200
NT score 56 of 200
AQ score: 47
RAADS-R score: 196


NicholasName
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

User avatar

Joined: 15 Sep 2013
Age: 37
Gender: Female
Posts: 205

21 Sep 2014, 7:23 pm

I still have several storage facilities worth of baggage about this. I was always punished harsher and allowed to get away with less than others, oh, but don't think anyone ever got in trouble for how they treated me!


_________________
I'm female; my username is a pun on "nickname."


olympiadis
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Jun 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,849
Location: Fairview Heights Illinois

21 Sep 2014, 7:23 pm

jbw wrote:
LabPet wrote:
Yes, Student E's plight is very real. Denying or making up excuses to cover up this mistreatment does not do justice to this hurtfully unfair issue. I know precisely what you mean, and how do we tangibly describe it?

Like glider18 described, Student E presents well and treats others respectfully, so why? The uncanny valley is a hypothesis mostly ascribed to human aesthetics, robotics, etc. When any given human feature, manner or behavioural attribute looks really close, but not exactly like, natural those of a natural human being, the response by any given observer is revulsion. Even if the observer (a teacher, in glider18's example) is unaware of his/her bias, they are acting on it. Yes, I think we do have an 'autistic aura' and the unknown is frightening to outsiders and they exact their judgment accordingly.

When I was little I was teased to tears because I seemed slightly robot-like. Although I was well-mannered and certainly high-functioning, I was just slightly deviated from their rigid social standard. Neurotypical people are highly attuned to detecting differences. Now, this discerning trait can be cruel too.

I guess there is no answer, but wouldn't it be revealing if we could somehow record the observer's bias, to show them how they act? Because robots can cry when mistreated.

Yes, the uncanny valley hypothesis can explain a lot of behaviour towards autistics. For example, we may be convinced that we act in a respectful manner, but others may not perceive our behaviour and words as being respectful, simply because I think the autistic understanding of respectful differs from the neurotypical understanding.

The dictionary definition of respectful: feeling or showing deference and respect.

While I take care to show respect, I don't think I am capable of showing deference, i.e. humble submission. The former relates to abilities, qualities, achievements, wishes, and rights, while latter relates to submission to an arbitrary authority in terms of some notion of social rank.

Correct me if I am wrong, but I get the impression that many of us have a sense of fairness that is compatible with the philosophy of anarchism (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchism), specifically the rejection of any hierarchical form of social organisation.

Anyone with a non-hierarchical value system will fail at showing genuine deference and any attempts at mimicking deference for pragmatic purposes are likely to be picked up subconsciously as fake by the neurotypical social perceptive filters ? and the uncanny valley effect kicks in.

The aspect of deference is probably exactly the aspect that many teachers place great emphasis on. Additionally, in our childhood many of us will have experienced situations where we knew much more about a particular topic than our teacher. Then also genuine respect goes out the window, especially if the teacher tries to maintain a facade of authority even if alerted to errors or significant gaps in knowledge.

Autistics are true experts in falling out of favour with official "authorities". Note, I can't even bring myself to use the "a" word without quotes ;-)



100% correct.



olympiadis
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Jun 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,849
Location: Fairview Heights Illinois

21 Sep 2014, 7:32 pm

jbw wrote:
dianthus wrote:
... coming across as more vulnerable than other people around you. Some people respond to that by showing more kindness or having a sort of protective attitude. And other people just go after it in a predatory sort of way.

Yes, correct. I usually go to great length to explain how I arrive at a particular conclusion, and point out any uncertainties regarding the supporting evidence or underlying assumptions, no matter how small. Many people will interpret this openness as a weakness or vulnerability, and use it to start a debate and to position themselves as an "authority", without providing any substantive facts or new insights.

In my experience the number of people who value an honest expert assessment/analysis of a situation are a small minority. Most people expect a sugar coated version of the truth that very carefully avoids any potential conflict with the established social hierarchy.



Exactly. When I state all possibilities instead of just the expected one, it is seen as negative attitude and lacking confidence.

It offends certain people when I ask them certain questions. It's as if I should automatically know that they think themselves above answering such questions.

When I give some people an honest answer of "no", they react like their whole reality just collapsed on them, and I must be some kind of insane alien.



Andrejake
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Mar 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 544
Location: Brasil

21 Sep 2014, 7:33 pm

That happened to me so many times!! ! And even situations almost exactly as the one you described!
Just last week i was in the middle of a lesson about soil mechanics and apparently the teacher warned us that we should print the exercise and take it to do it in the classroom. Well, i didn't heard she saying this and four others students also haven't. One by one they've gone at her and asked for a copy and she opened a folder and gave them one. When i noticed that, i got up, went to her desk and asked for a copy too but she answered: I'm not giving copies anymore because i warned you all during last class that you should bring it printed. If you want it you can go to the PC rooms and print it yourself.
I was so embarrassed that for a few seconds i wanted to hit my head on the wall.
And i was really bothered by that situation trying to understand if by any reason i was rude or something like that when asking her but i don't think so.



jbw
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 13 Dec 2013
Age: 61
Gender: Male
Posts: 421

21 Sep 2014, 9:45 pm

olympiadis wrote:
jbw wrote:
LabPet wrote:
Yes, Student E's plight is very real. Denying or making up excuses to cover up this mistreatment does not do justice to this hurtfully unfair issue. I know precisely what you mean, and how do we tangibly describe it?

Like glider18 described, Student E presents well and treats others respectfully, so why? The uncanny valley is a hypothesis mostly ascribed to human aesthetics, robotics, etc. When any given human feature, manner or behavioural attribute looks really close, but not exactly like, natural those of a natural human being, the response by any given observer is revulsion. Even if the observer (a teacher, in glider18's example) is unaware of his/her bias, they are acting on it. Yes, I think we do have an 'autistic aura' and the unknown is frightening to outsiders and they exact their judgment accordingly.

When I was little I was teased to tears because I seemed slightly robot-like. Although I was well-mannered and certainly high-functioning, I was just slightly deviated from their rigid social standard. Neurotypical people are highly attuned to detecting differences. Now, this discerning trait can be cruel too.

I guess there is no answer, but wouldn't it be revealing if we could somehow record the observer's bias, to show them how they act? Because robots can cry when mistreated.

Yes, the uncanny valley hypothesis can explain a lot of behaviour towards autistics. For example, we may be convinced that we act in a respectful manner, but others may not perceive our behaviour and words as being respectful, simply because I think the autistic understanding of respectful differs from the neurotypical understanding.

The dictionary definition of respectful: feeling or showing deference and respect.

While I take care to show respect, I don't think I am capable of showing deference, i.e. humble submission. The former relates to abilities, qualities, achievements, wishes, and rights, while latter relates to submission to an arbitrary authority in terms of some notion of social rank.

Correct me if I am wrong, but I get the impression that many of us have a sense of fairness that is compatible with the philosophy of anarchism (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchism), specifically the rejection of any hierarchical form of social organisation.

Anyone with a non-hierarchical value system will fail at showing genuine deference and any attempts at mimicking deference for pragmatic purposes are likely to be picked up subconsciously as fake by the neurotypical social perceptive filters ? and the uncanny valley effect kicks in.

The aspect of deference is probably exactly the aspect that many teachers place great emphasis on. Additionally, in our childhood many of us will have experienced situations where we knew much more about a particular topic than our teacher. Then also genuine respect goes out the window, especially if the teacher tries to maintain a facade of authority even if alerted to errors or significant gaps in knowledge.

Autistics are true experts in falling out of favour with official "authorities". Note, I can't even bring myself to use the "a" word without quotes ;-)



100% correct.

Last week I had a fascinating discussion with a neurotypical colleague and friend. He confirmed that also from his perspective psychopaths play a significant role in shaping society and culture. We then discussed the suspected link between the autistic spectrum and a sense of fairness that is compatible with the philosophy of anarchism. My friend could follow my line of reasoning, and suggested that the world needs more autistic anarchists. I did not expect this level of support for my point of view, and the conversation has got me thinking about a possible avenue for improving the interface between autistics and the neurotypical world.

Anarchism covers a broad range of philosophies. The commonalities across the board boil down to non-hierarchical forms of organisation. I am not sure what percentage of anarchists are on the autistic spectrum, but the set of all those drawn to some form of anarchism is bound to include a significant number of people without strong autistic traits but with a strong sense of fairness.

Perhaps the non-autistic part of the Venn diagram of people on the autistic spectrum and people drawn to anarchism represents the ideal interface between the autistic and the non-autistic world.

We need people who can relate to our intrinsic motivation and our passion for specific special interests, who at the same time are capable of native, non-mimicked, neurotypical style of communication and interaction. Such people clearly see the benefits of non-hierarchical organisation, yet they may be much more pragmatic and capable of operating in a hierarchical social environment than autistics.

In the short term, over a few days, I am quite good at mimicking the neurotypical style of communication and interaction, but it feels like a mental Ironman triathlon. Afterwards I am so drained that I need several days alone, where all social interaction is limited to my immediate family members who are also ASD or BAP.

Whilst I "max out" at 4 out of 14 days of operating in a hierarchical social environment, my neurotypical friend swims in it 14 out of 14 days without burnout, and he does not make any of the "fatal" mistakes that autistics tend to make every now and then when emulating the neurotypical style in a social setting.

Even if the set of non-autistic-friends-of-anarchism is no larger than the set of people on the autistic spectrum, it may provide us with a concrete recipe for constructing autism-friendly organisations that are capable of interacting with the wider neurotypical world in the best possible way.

I sincerely believe autistics can be great collaborators in a non-hierarchical context. The autistic cognitive style only becomes an impediment in the context of hierarchical organisation. As long as society rejects all forms of non-hierarchical organisation as unworkable or utopian, people with an autistic cognitive style will be systematically discriminated against.

Autistics face a challenge today similar to the challenge homosexuals were facing to a comparable extent 50 years ago. Acceptance of minorities will always be fraught with difficulties, but progress is possible.



CockneyRebel
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jul 2004
Age: 51
Gender: Male
Posts: 121,145
Location: In my own little country

21 Sep 2014, 11:23 pm

I was student E as well. My kindred soul was also student E. It's not a good feeling and I learned that I should no longer trust teachers with my questions when I was in Grade 8.


_________________
The Family Schlager


glider18
Supporting Member
Supporting Member

User avatar

Joined: 8 Nov 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,170
Location: USA

22 Sep 2014, 7:10 am

I had no idea if this thread would take off or not, but it is clear that the problem I have seen with Student "E" is not unique. There are many of us who either are, or have been, a Student "E." I want to thank everyone who has shared experiences so far. I am going to search my mind for personal experiences I may have had when I was a student in school to relate to this.

My plan today is to closely monitor Student "E" during the class I work with. I am going to chronicle the manner in which the teacher interacts with him. I will also try to determine any noticeable ways his delivery is different from the other students.

I have found it most enlightening to read the responses so far. It is my wish that Student "E" individuals will someday be treated with the dignity and respect they deserve. But for now, it appears that society in general will (knowingly or unknowingly) target unique individuals and press upon them ...

AND ...

as incredible of a coincidence as this may seem ... at this exact moment ... I have just encountered total disrespect as a professional at the school where I teach ... I will explain later ... but I guess I too will never fit in ... I guess I am Teacher "E."


_________________
"My journey has just begun."


glider18
Supporting Member
Supporting Member

User avatar

Joined: 8 Nov 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,170
Location: USA

22 Sep 2014, 10:24 am

All during my teaching career I have been lucky to have a classroom to call my own. Whenever special handicap and behavior units were brought to our school and needed a room, it was me that would have to give up his room to accommodate it. Then I would have to work out of other teachers' rooms when they weren't using them so that I could teach my students. Now, as a type of intervention specialist, I had a room that I had to share with another teacher. When that teacher retired, rather than allow me to have the room, I got moved to an 8 foot by 8 foot janitor's closet with a beat up metal desk out of the bus garage (while all the other teachers got brand new desks). After expressing my concerns last year, the administration found me a classroom where I could keep my materials, plan, and pull out students from classes when they need extra help. After restroom duty earlier this morning (while typing the above the post) I returned to my room to find a history class in their working on computers. It turns out they will be using my room as a computer lab for the high school. And it was too noisy in there for me to plan effectively.

Why didn't the administration tell me of this arrangement beforehand?

Why can't I have a private room like everyone else (including the intervention specialists)?


_________________
"My journey has just begun."


arielhawksquill
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jun 2008
Age: 50
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,830
Location: Midwest

22 Sep 2014, 11:24 am

I don't doubt the central thesis of this thread, which is that autistics are treated with less respect than their peers.

However, I can possibly deconstruct how this one type of situation goes wrong--it's about timing, and gauging emotional reaction (both things which are hard to do correctly.) The teacher was becoming more and more irritable when each person asked to go get a book, and snapped at person #5. If the autistic student had been the SECOND person to ask to go outside, the teacher would have allowed it (having just allowed the first student to go, she couldn't deny the second person without showing obvious favoritism.) By the time the FOURTH person asked, all the NT kids would notice by the annoyance in the teacher's voice and expression on her face she was getting tired of being asked. The autistic kid wouldn't notice these cues, and so goes on to become #5 and the teacher decides to make an example of them to discourage any further requests from the class.



glider18
Supporting Member
Supporting Member

User avatar

Joined: 8 Nov 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,170
Location: USA

22 Sep 2014, 12:53 pm

arielhawksquill wrote:
I don't doubt the central thesis of this thread, which is that autistics are treated with less respect than their peers.

However, I can possibly deconstruct how this one type of situation goes wrong--it's about timing, and gauging emotional reaction (both things which are hard to do correctly.) The teacher was becoming more and more irritable when each person asked to go get a book, and snapped at person #5. If the autistic student had been the SECOND person to ask to go outside, the teacher would have allowed it (having just allowed the first student to go, she couldn't deny the second person without showing obvious favoritism.) By the time the FOURTH person asked, all the NT kids would notice by the annoyance in the teacher's voice and expression on her face she was getting tired of being asked. The autistic kid wouldn't notice these cues, and so goes on to become #5 and the teacher decides to make an example of them to discourage any further requests from the class.


That is an interesting theory on this. I will try to notice these things in the future with him and see if that might be a cause of this. Thanks for the input.


_________________
"My journey has just begun."


btbnnyr
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 May 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,359
Location: Lost Angleles Carmen Santiago

22 Sep 2014, 6:45 pm

arielhawksquill wrote:
I don't doubt the central thesis of this thread, which is that autistics are treated with less respect than their peers.

However, I can possibly deconstruct how this one type of situation goes wrong--it's about timing, and gauging emotional reaction (both things which are hard to do correctly.) The teacher was becoming more and more irritable when each person asked to go get a book, and snapped at person #5. If the autistic student had been the SECOND person to ask to go outside, the teacher would have allowed it (having just allowed the first student to go, she couldn't deny the second person without showing obvious favoritism.) By the time the FOURTH person asked, all the NT kids would notice by the annoyance in the teacher's voice and expression on her face she was getting tired of being asked. The autistic kid wouldn't notice these cues, and so goes on to become #5 and the teacher decides to make an example of them to discourage any further requests from the class.


I think this is the most accurate eggsplanation of this situation.
I'm not convinced that it was caused by autistic aura, but that the student asked too late, and didn't know when not to ask.
I wonder if the student spent some time deliberating in his mind whether or not to ask the teacher.
Next time, he may get bester responses if he doesn't deliberate, but just asks quickly.
There was the delay in the beginning, and not picking up social cues not to ask later.


_________________
Drain and plane and grain and blain your brain, and then again,
Propane and butane out of the gas main, your blain shall sustain!


LokiofSassgard
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Sep 2014
Age: 37
Gender: Female
Posts: 719
Location: My own autistic wonderland!

22 Sep 2014, 6:54 pm

I sued to be a college program for high school students. Well, the class I took was early childhood. The teacer went on to explain how you can't punish a child for something they did they day before or something. Anyway, me and a few friends were chewing gum in her class, but see, gum isn't allowed. She waited until after about a few days to scold me. She even told me that because of my actions, I had to stay longer with dealing with the younger kids. She almost made me late for my bus. Not once did she ever scold the person who gave me the gum or the other girl she gave it to either.

It was rather disheartening. When I told my parents, they were furious, and because of what had happened, I quit the program period and never went back.


_________________
Currently diagnosed with Autistic Disorder, ADHD, severe anxiety, learning delays and developmental delays.