Fnord wrote:
Since Temple Grandin has an officially-diagnosed, yet highly-functional disability, calling her an "Ableist" would be inappropriate due to her disability,
Sorry to nitpick, but did you mean that it would be inappropriate to call her an ableist because she does not bash neurotypicals ?
My son has LFA, and I have not seen / heard / interpreted anything that Dr. Grandin says as being biased and disableist towards individuals with LFA. I have always had the impression that she does not want parents and caregivers to give up, and to presume competence, even if their charges show no outward veneer of even a shred of competency.
I have been impressed and motivated by Dr. Grandin and her mother, Eustacia Cutler, and have read the mother's book, "A Thorn in My Pocket". Well educated (a Harvard grad), and very intelligent herself, Ms. Cutler refused to follow doctors' advise that she institutionalize her 4-yr-old non-verbal daughter and "move on with her own life". 2 years ago, that book saved my sanity. I was going through an extremely difficult phase with my son, and was at the end of my rope. If it hadn't been for the words of advise from Dr. Grandin's speeches and her mother's book, I would have probably have ended up in a lunatic asylum somewhere by now.
I beg leave to disagree with the author. There is nothing disableist about "presuming competency" of LFAs, and / or expecting nothing but the best from them - to the extent of their capabilities. I actually find the author's posting quite disableist if she thinks that LFAs should *not* be expected to live independently and as productive members of society.
_________________
O villain, villain, smiling, damnèd villain!
My tables—meet it is I set it down
That one may smile, and smile, and be a villain.
At least I'm sure it may be so in "Denmark".
-- Hamlet, 1.5.113-116