Sanityisoverrated wrote:
It's pretty much impossible to prove or disprove anything.
Thus why we have theories rather than dogma.
Sophist wrote:
Actually, I have been reading up on paleoanthropology more of late and scientists are coming round to a different conclusion.
I've not read much of late or ever devoted an abnormal (for me) amount of time to it, but last I heard, the experts were divided.
Same article wrote:
That's a highly contentious point. Other anthropologists, such as Erik Trinkaus of the University of Pennsylvania and Milford Wolpoff of the University of Michigan, contend that many modern humans carry at least some genes of Neanderthals mixed in with their own.
Three years ago, Trinkaus and a team of Portuguese scientists described the skeleton of a young boy found in a shallow grave more than 25,000 years old and said they determined from his bones that the youngster was at least part Neanderthal.
In interviews last week, both Trinkaus and Wolpoff argued that this was clear evidence that Neanderthals and modern human ancestors not only lived side by side but also mated and interbred. "The so-called modern humans are a 50-50 combination of ancestry from both peoples," Wolpoff says. "In many Europeans today, you can clearly see the physical features of a Neanderthal past.
Eventually, a tough bunch of facts will get together and rough up one or both of the theories to make space for something new (probably, but not necessarily incorporating one or both of the theories being discussed). I like the theory of neanderthal interbreeding for the rather startling implications it would have if it became widely accepted over the alternatives, but it's just one of a bunch of possibilities and a fondness for a theory doesn't make it more sound. It's a sufficiently weak theory at the moment that the next batch of evidence could fairly easily kill it, and evidence in it's favour of similar magnitude would only make it marginally more safe.
Sophist wrote:
And I think most modern paleoanthropologists no longer refer to the Neaderthals as a subset of our own species; thus they are more commonly called these days simply Homo neanderthalis.
Again, I must be out of date or mistaken. Last time I checked, the argument was still pretty hot. Do you have any links for me to see what the latest info is?
_________________
Banned for discussing the recent spate of bannings.