foxant wrote:
xxJennaxx wrote:
Personally, I dislike it. It's not commonly used within the autistic community and, from what I have seen, is most prevalent in places that joke about it (I see people joking about others being "autists" on YouTube annoyingly often). Then again, if it isn't used in an offensive way, it doesn't bother me too much.
i agree 100% with you. autists became the new "stupid, idiot or ret*d" nowadays. people are so mean

Exactly.
Words only mean what we humans make them to mean.
John Steinbeck's dust bowl refugee characters in "The Grapes of Wrath" come to a moment when they compare experiences and lament how the word "'Oakie' used to mean only that 'you came from Oklahoma' , but now it is an insult..".
A generation after Steinbeck's novel country singer Merle Haggart tried to "reclaim" the word in his song "Proud to be an Oakie From Muskogee".
If the internet trolls have latched on to "autist" then - I say let them have it because I think that the term is stupid and misleading anyway (as I explained above). Let him have that rotten bone. We can just use "autistic".
But if you like the term then maybe you can be the next Merle Haggard and record a song about being "proud to be an autist". An autist who is also an artist and a flautist.
Actually I think that "autist" is a good job title for what I do for a living for the inventory service: physically counting stuff in stores for the store's inventory. It sounds better than "inventory counter". Sometime we are referred to as "auditors". But thats misleading because the word "auditor" usually refers to salaried accountants, not to folks like us who physically count hundreds of actual widgets an hour for an hourly wage. But "autist" sounds just right (grander and briefer than "inventory counter", but not as high fallutin as "auditor").