B19 wrote:
A spectrum, in science, is a line between two points. All AS people are theoretically at some point on that spectrum, so as long as AS is seen as a spectrum - as it currently is described, by science, society and those on it - the term "on the spectrum" is valid and useful, it has nothing whatsoever to do with political correctness.
I don't happen to believe that the spectrum is an accurate representation, and think a Bell Curve distribution would be far more accurate to describe the AS population. However until that change occurs - if ever it does - then "on the spectrum" is accurate meantime.
I'm not so sure a normal distribution curve would be appropriate. If you ask me, the distribution probably follows that of a Reyleigh distribution:

Replace "wave height" with "degree of autism" and you'd probably get a pretty accurate picture of the spectrum and the number of those on the spectrum having that particular kind of ASD. HFA would be towards the left side, and Kanner ASD towards the right.
_________________
~Glflegolas, B.Sc.
The Colourblind Country Chemist & Tropical TrackerMyers-Briggs personality: The CommanderAsperger's Quiz: 79/111, both neurodiverse and neurotypical traits present. AQ score: 23 Raads-r score: here