shortfatbalduglyman wrote:
Whatever it was, the writer was referring to you, only. (Singular)
Not all autistics
Not necessarily.
Depends on how it was worded.
If the report said "We believe that so and so is autistic for these reasons", and among the so called symptoms he had that they list as evidence of him being autistic were "lack of imagination" then it very definitely refers to autistics as a group.