Soso-Lynn wrote:
There is plenty of evidence showing that vegetarians are healthier than corpse-eaters.
If you are comparing the AVERAGE vegetarian with the AVERAGE meat-eater then I have no doubt that you are correct. But that's a false comparison for a number of reasons that are too long to go into here. But notice that I stipulated a MODEST amount of animal protein; most people eat way too much -- me included.
Quote:
And it is a moral issue. Killing animals to eat them when it is completely unnecessary in a western context is morally unacceptable. A lion is not given the opportunity to choose, human beings are.
I'm curious in what context you would find it acceptable.
The plain fact is that this is basically a religious issue -- not for me, but certainly for you -- whether you will admit to that or not. But I don't ascribe to your religion and I'm not bound by your moral dictates any more than I am to Jewish kosher law or Catholic Lenten observation.
Quote:
Humans are omnivores the same way chimps are. We are capable of digesting meat if we have to, but we do much better on a vegetarian diet.
If you're careful to consume enough beans and such for protein and spinach for iron. But not only are we capable of digesting and metabolizing meat we actually make use of a far larger percentage of the mass of meat consumed versus plant material consumed. The primary component of plant matter, analogous to protein in meat, is cellulose, which we are completely unable to digest.
Quote:
For most other primates, meat-eating is more of ritualistic thing, when a predator is successfully killed, the alpha-male might eat parts of it.
You know, while you're perfectly entitled to your opinion, you're not entitled to your own facts. I have no idea where you got that, but it's simply not true. Chimpanzees eat meat regularly and have even been observed constructing spears to hunt prey -- mostly small monkeys.
Quote:
The annual amount of meat eaten by the average chimp is insignificant when compared to the average human.
That's because we're better at it.
Quote:
There is nothing inherent about our biology to make us eat meat. And even if we were meat-eater by our evolution, the thing about that is that we still are capable of evolving.
We're not
compelled to eat meat, but we are by nature opportunistic eaters -- the closest animal analogy would be to the bear, I suppose -- and most people prefer the taste of meat because it is inherently more nutritious than plant material pound for pound.
And we're probably pretty much through with evolution. The normal physical evolutionary pressures have been largely supplanted by cultural factors. So, if anything, it would appear that we are evolutionarily selecting for poverty and religious fundamentalism as those tend to increase the pressure to bear children.
Quote:
I personally think that evolutionary fatalism is just as bad as creationism.
And I think that in-your-face, politically correct vegetarianism is just another religious fanaticism.
_________________
Do the voices in my head bother you?