Page 2 of 2 [ 25 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

Edna3362
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 29 Oct 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 13,727
Location: ᜆᜄᜎᜓᜄ᜔

29 Aug 2020, 7:20 pm

Joe90 wrote:
Quote:
If NT means also not having any sort of psychiatric conditions or disorder...

Does that mean NTs don't get stressed? Don't become vulnerable? Don't get traumatized? Don't become dysfunctional, don't get hormonal issues, don't get frustrated, don't get affected by any form of deprivation/excess, and don't develop personality or identity issues???


There is a difference between general human traits and disorders. These listed are human traits.

Like with everything, the line has to be drawn somewhere. It's a bit like with age; when I was at college I had to get my parents to sign permission slips when I was 17, but as soon as I turned 18 I didn't need to do that any more. You could say "what's the difference between 17 and 18?" There is no difference as you're still the same person on your 18th birthday to what you were when you were 17, but the line has to be drawn somewhere that legalises when you're an adult and when you're a child.

So same with neurology; some thinking styles and behaviours are what is considered "typical", whilst other thinking styles and behaviours happen to be a certain amount of traits and behaviours that are grouped together and form a disorder, usually terminal (meaning it cannot be cured and you will have the disorder for your whole life).

Very good. :lol:
It's this sorts I want some others to see.


The distinction of human traits and disorders.

This also depends on which references or idea one draws from.
Age 18 as legal age -- so does from where I live. But then there's age 15, ages 21 or upon completing some milestone or trial elsewhere.

There are countless parameters.
The debated standards drawn can say it's too inclusive or too exclusive, if it even exists -- to say which to say what is NT. :lol:


_________________
Gained Number Post Count (1).
Lose Time (n).

Lose more time here - Updates at least once a week.


nca14
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,337
Location: Poland

30 Aug 2020, 7:00 am

Two interesting articles:
https://paulcooijmans.com/asperger/aspe ... rized.html - Asperger's 1944 article summarized
https://paulcooijmans.com/asperger/stra ... erger.html - Straight talk about Asperger syndrome

I think that people with "schizoid disorder of childhood", "social subtypes of NVLD" or "social communication disorder" are not allistic even if they do not match DSM-V ASD criteria (at least when they are uninterested in "normal" life (especially in socio-emotional area) since childhood). For me these individuals have other sort(s) of developmental autistic disorder than "bookish Asperger's" (which, for me, is Kanner's autism with not so large speech delay and with quite mild disorders of functional language and without intellectual disability) and full-blown Kanner's syndrome.

I would say that there is NOT one family of developmental disorders which could be named "autistic". I think that some sorts of developmental and persistent autism are not associated with lack of intuitive theory of mind, need of sameness and predictability, echolalia, pronoun reversal, weak central coherence, sensory overloads, shutdowns, speech delay, visual thinking, prosopagnosia or "human blindness", idiosyncratic sensory processing, uninterest in pretend play... But it does not mean that person with such an autism would be automatically higher functioning than anyone who has "traditional", "typical", "bookish" autism.

For me the "purest" autism is something like "childhood-onset self-absorbtion", "pathological nonconformism syndrome" which may look rather like "childhood-onset personality disorder from cluster A (odd-eccentric)" (something like "autistic psychopathy", "autistic personality disorder") than like other way of processing sensory stimuli and information or a cognitive disorder/deficit. People with it are "by nature" uninterested in being loved emotionally (for example by parents), having friends (especially "platonic") - though some may have severe (and often unconventional, disordered) romantic-sexual drive from early age, can have tendency to be more attached to objects than to people, do not feel shame in certain situations when "normal" people obviously feel (and these autistic people may even feel good in such situations rgardless of their will, which can cause for example (uncontrollable) laughter). Such a state is even more severe than schizoid personality disorder and probably tends to have lower adaptability in adult life than schizoid PD. It is a sort "general unsuitability to world", it may be called "a disturbance of the instinct". Maybe it is even a form of childhood-onset schizophrenia (which does not go away after getting medications)?



KT67
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 6 May 2019
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,807

30 Aug 2020, 10:24 am

I'd call allistic people NT or call them their disability. If it's something like my anxiety that isn't how the brain is made, I'd say 'someone with...'. If it's inherently a part of them, I'd say 'a .... person'. Like I'm an autistic person & take away my autism I'd be totally different. Take away my anxiety, I'd just be healthy and back to my old self like I was as a kid - indeed that's what I'm like when I manage it.

There's also two kinds of NT.

NT ppl I like. Happen just not to be autistic. Are likely introvert or ambivert. Are deep thinkers. Have values & stick to them. Care about everyone who is nice. My mum is like that. She's NT and she's been vegetarian since the 70s when she was 7 because she cares so much about animal rights, it's a real interest/belief deep-set in her and she doesn't mind looking 'weird' over it.

NT people I don't like. Super NTs. Feel really bad for autistic people. Extroverts. Go out drinking on Friday nights. Never think deeply. Don't have much in the way of values except 'that's normal' versus 'that's weird'. Hate weird people & 'losers'. Hate autistic people. Laugh at weirdos. Live for a laugh rather than anything serious. Lack substance.

I hate that second kind of NT person tbh.


_________________
Not actually a girl
He/him


Joe90
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Feb 2010
Gender: Female
Posts: 26,492
Location: UK

30 Aug 2020, 1:58 pm

The reason why I hate it when Aspies call all allistics NTs is because I've met a lot of diverse people in my life and their diversity didn't always mean autistic.

I have a neighbour who has severe intellectual disability (they used to call it Mental Retardation but I don't think that's PC these days). This lad is actually my age but is constantly in a wheelchair and needs 24-hour care. He literally is unable to work and the only word he can say is "hello". To some Aspies, managing to say hello to every person means socially skilled, but I've been articulate and verbal since I was 2 years old and I'm on the spectrum. He is not autistic, he just has some other neurological disability that impairs his whole life. He has loving parents who brought him up and are his carers now, and he's very happy. When you push him along in his wheelchair he'd say hello to every person he sees, and if they respond he claps his hands excitedly and points and babbles. When some mean people snicker or make fun of him, he doesn't realise it, and he still claps his hands playfully just because they're looking at him, but he's unaware that their staring is not a friendly gesture.
He's actually the size of a normal 30-year-old man but he can't walk independently because his brain doesn't let him; it's like he's a 10-month-old baby trapped in a man's body. But to him the world is a very happy, simple place with friendly people everywhere and brightly-coloured objects to play with. That's all he sees the world as.
He doesn't have sensory issues or need for routine or special interests, because he's not autistic, but that still doesn't make him NT. He's very different and always will be. He'll never work, live independently, get a girlfriend, drive or have children. He doesn't even understand that there's a pandemic right now.


_________________
Female


League_Girl
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Feb 2010
Gender: Female
Posts: 27,317
Location: Pacific Northwest

30 Aug 2020, 2:12 pm

To me, someone who has mental issues is not an NT by any means. That can be trauma, anything that impacts the person's functioning and if their reaction is abnormal to a situation.


_________________
Son: Diagnosed w/anxiety and ADHD. Also academic delayed and ASD lv 1.

Daughter: NT, no diagnoses. Possibly OCD. Is very private about herself.


KT67
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 6 May 2019
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,807

30 Aug 2020, 5:39 pm

Yeah someone with mental issues isn't NT.

But that implies an autistic brain is never healthy.

I don't think that's true.

I think there are healthy allistic brains (NT ones), healthy autistic ones, mentally ill allistic brains, mentally ill autistic ones, learning difficulty allistic ones and learning difficulty autistic ones.

Also if I specifically refer to someone as NT, it's either cos for some reason I really need to make it clear they're not autistic or because they're the kind of extreme NT I mentioned above.

I wouldn't point it out otherwise.

It's difficult for me to deal with extreme NT people but a lot of my friends are allistic people with healthy brains who like the same things as me and are quirky like I am and don't care too much over gossip etc.


_________________
Not actually a girl
He/him


Caz72
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Feb 2013
Age: 54
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,394
Location: England

30 Aug 2020, 7:15 pm

went to special school for children with disabilities when i was 5-12 y/o
there were some autistic, downs ,tourettes, learning difficulties , behaviour issues allsorts of neurodiversities that didnt qualify for mainstream school
probably nobody at the school were n-ts


_________________
Have diagnosis of autism.
Have a neurotypical son.


carlos55
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 5 Mar 2018
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,102

31 Aug 2020, 6:42 am

There is no diagnosis for NT because it’s a control group in science i.e unaffected.

You can’t prove a negative.

ASD is regarded a disorder that’s diagnosed by positive symptoms by biological science, just like having COVID 19 is a disorder.

You can go for a Covid Test and it will come back negative, but what if you were infected by touching the door handle at the test Centre and it wont show up yet? which means you can’t prove a negative for COVID-19 only that your not positive.

It’s the same for NT as far as science is concerned a person may not show positive for autism or anything else which makes them NT. But that doesn’t mean they won’t get schizophrenia or some other neurological issue in a years time so you can’t prove or diagnose NT.

That’s why science is trying to find biological markers for ASD and other neurological disorders.

Everyone is NT until proven otherwise.

Hope that helps.


_________________
"The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends upon the unreasonable man."

- George Bernie Shaw


ToughDiamond
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Sep 2008
Age: 73
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,534

31 Aug 2020, 9:46 am

carlos55 wrote:
There is no diagnosis for NT because it’s a control group in science i.e unaffected.

You can’t prove a negative.


Didn't stop somebody having a go though.
https://uncyclopedia.ca/wiki/Neurotypic ... e#Symptoms