Questions if we DSM should bring back PDD once again

Page 2 of 3 [ 37 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

Pieplup
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Dec 2015
Age: 23
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 2,658
Location: Maine

03 Sep 2020, 12:50 am

nca14 wrote:
I think that every developmental disorder characterised by social inadequacy and peculiarity should be classified in one subgroup of developmental disorders with "classic autism". I think that developmental disorders can be pervasive and severely problematic in life when they are only about socio-emotional area, without RRBIs (repetitive, restricted behaviors or interests) and sensory issues (especially asscoiated with idiosyncratic, other that usual, sensory processing). So I would say that marked schizoid tendencies since childhood (not starting in adolescence or adulthood) are enough to be classified as a pervasive developmental disorder.

Being classified as having PERVASIVE developmental disorder might help me a lot in my life since 2008. Without it I might be without adequate support, also in financial area. I have no "narrow mind", I am poor in managing with sensory discomfort (I HATE physical suffering) but I do not have unusual sensory processing - I just "not tolerate" physical pain or discomfort (for example during shower or after it).

I think that ASD, SCD and social NVLD are among conditions which should be grouped in one subcategory of developmental disorders in future editions of ICD or DSM (that subcategory should exclude developmental disorders which do not cause social inadequacy (ineptitude and, especially, diiminished social interest or motivation) and peculiarity ("quirkiness", "oddness") like dyslexia or dyscalculia).
I don't think learning disabilities should be grouped together with autism and as far as SCD why have a subcategory for two disorders. And secondly wouldn't having a developmental disability in an of itself cause you to be peculiar?
Ok so Intellectual disability. Could potentially cause social inadequecy. Global developmental delay would surely cause it. dyspraxia might depending on what definition of it we are using. there's developmental verbal dyspraxia which surely would, as it causes you to have difficulties talking and making sounds. I don't think we can include adhd, However. NVLD would cause social difficulties althought has never been included in the DSM or ICD. might be able to include tourrete's but i wouldnt' really say it would cause social inadequecy. Communication and language disorders would be included in this category. Scizophrenia would also be in it. So like 2 out of those wouldn't be added into this? A Category that includes the vast majority of developmental disorders is a pointless category.


_________________
[color=#0066cc]ever changing evolving and growing
I am pieplup i have level 3 autism and a number of severe mental illnesses. I am rarely active on here anymore.
I run a discord for moderate-severely autistic people if anyone would like to join. You can also contact me on discord @Pieplup


FranzOren
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 10 Jun 2019
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,357

03 Sep 2020, 1:30 am

Pieplup wrote:
nca14 wrote:
I think that every developmental disorder characterised by social inadequacy and peculiarity should be classified in one subgroup of developmental disorders with "classic autism". I think that developmental disorders can be pervasive and severely problematic in life when they are only about socio-emotional area, without RRBIs (repetitive, restricted behaviors or interests) and sensory issues (especially asscoiated with idiosyncratic, other that usual, sensory processing). So I would say that marked schizoid tendencies since childhood (not starting in adolescence or adulthood) are enough to be classified as a pervasive developmental disorder.

Being classified as having PERVASIVE developmental disorder might help me a lot in my life since 2008. Without it I might be without adequate support, also in financial area. I have no "narrow mind", I am poor in managing with sensory discomfort (I HATE physical suffering) but I do not have unusual sensory processing - I just "not tolerate" physical pain or discomfort (for example during shower or after it).

I think that ASD, SCD and social NVLD are among conditions which should be grouped in one subcategory of developmental disorders in future editions of ICD or DSM (that subcategory should exclude developmental disorders which do not cause social inadequacy (ineptitude and, especially, diiminished social interest or motivation) and peculiarity ("quirkiness", "oddness") like dyslexia or dyscalculia).
I don't think learning disabilities should be grouped together with autism and as far as SCD why have a subcategory for two disorders. And secondly wouldn't having a developmental disability in an of itself cause you to be peculiar?
Ok so Intellectual disability. Could potentially cause social inadequecy. Global developmental delay would surely cause it. dyspraxia might depending on what definition of it we are using. there's developmental verbal dyspraxia which surely would, as it causes you to have difficulties talking and making sounds. I don't think we can include adhd, However. NVLD would cause social difficulties althought has never been included in the DSM or ICD. might be able to include tourrete's but i wouldnt' really say it would cause social inadequecy. Communication and language disorders would be included in this category. Scizophrenia would also be in it. So like 2 out of those wouldn't be added into this? A Category that includes the vast majority of developmental disorders is a pointless category.




I think it is because of this


\|/

"The diagnostic category of pervasive developmental disorders (PDD) refers to a group of disorders characterized by delays in the development of socialization and communication skills. Parents may note symptoms as early as infancy, although the typical age of onset is before 3 years of age."


It was written by National Institutes of Health ( a government website that studies in medical fields ).



https://www.ninds.nih.gov/disorders/all ... 20of%20age.



Pieplup
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Dec 2015
Age: 23
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 2,658
Location: Maine

03 Sep 2020, 1:36 am

FranzOren wrote:
I think the diagnostic criteria of ICD, DSM or any other diagnostic criteria should call it 'Communication Spectrum Disorder' or 'Autism Spectrum and Other Pervasive Developmental Disorders'.


the diagnostic criteria for Autism is a little too restrictive

I don't see what Communication spectrum disoder would include? would the just put all language disorders in it? I don't really see the need for it. As for Autism Spectrum and other pervasive developmental disorders? What other pervasive developmental disorders are we talking about. All the ones that were in the DSM-IV were merged into merged into Autism Spectrum Disorder. And those who don't fit would go into unspecified developmental disorder or other developmental disorder. and How so? I don't think it's restrictive. I think the problem with it is that the levels were based on language impairment or intellectual delay and i believe that was changed to support needed. i think that's a vastly superior way to do it. It's a more accurate way to define it. Rather than arbitrarily saying some are low functioning or high function it's ranked based on how much support said person needs.
ok so here are the criteria for ASD

DSM-V wrote:
Autism Spectrum Disorder
Diagnostic Criteria 299.00 (F84.0)
A. Persistent deficits in social communication and social interaction across multiple contexts, as manifested by the
following, currently or by history (examples are illustrative, not exhaustive; see text):
1. Deficits in social-emotional reciprocity, ranging, for example, from abnormal social approach and failure of
normal back-and-forth conversation; to reduced sharing of interests, emotions, or affect; to failure to initiate or
respond to social interactions.
2. Deficits in nonverbal communicative behaviors used for social interaction, ranging, for example, from poorly
integrated verbal and nonverbal communication; to abnormalities in eye contact and body language or deficits
in understanding and use of gestures: to a total lack of facial expressions and nonverbal communication.
3. Deficits in developing, maintaining, and understanding relationships, ranging, for example, from difficulties
adjusting behavior to suit various social contexts; to difficulties in sharing imaginative play or in making
friends; to absence of interest in peers.
Specify current severity: Severity is based on social communication impairments and restricted, repetitive
patterns of behavior.
B. Restricted, repetitive patterns of behavior, interests, or activities, as manifested by at least two of the following,
currently or by history (examples are illustrative, not exhaustive; see text):
1. Stereotyped or repetitive motor movements, use of objects, or speech (e.g., simple motor stereotypies,
lining up toys or flipping objects, echolalia, idiosyncratic phrases).
2. Insistence on sameness, inflexible adherence to routines, or ritualized patterns of verbal or nonverbal
behavior (e.g., extreme distress at small changes, difficulties with transitions, rigid thinking patterns, greeting
rituals, need to take same route or eat same food every day).
3. Highly restricted, fixated interests that are abnormal in intensity or focus (e.g., strong attachment to or
preoccupation with unusual objects, excessively circumscribed or perseverative interests).
4. Hyper- or hyporeactivity to sensory input or unusual interest in sensory aspects of the environment (e.g.,
apparent indifference to pain/temperature, adverse response to specific sounds or textures, excessive smelling
or touching of objects, visual fascination with lights or movement).
Specify current severity: Severity is based on social communication impairments and restricted, repetitive
patterns of behavior (see Table 2).
C. Symptoms must be present in the early developmental period (but may not become fully manifest until social
demands exceed limited capacities, or may be masked by learned strategies in later life).
D. Symptoms cause clinically significant impairment in social, occupational, or other important areas of current functioning.
E. These disturbances are not better explained by intellectual disability (intellectual developmental disorder) or
global developmental delay. Intellectual disability and autism spectrum disorder frequently co-occur; to make
comorbid diagnoses of autism spectrum disorder and intellectual disability, social communication should be below
that expected for general developmental level.
Note: Individuals with a well-established DSM-IV diagnosis of autistic disorder, Asperger’s disorder, or pervasive developmental disorder not otherwise specified should be given the diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder. Individuals who have marked deficits in social communication, but whose symptoms do not otherwise meet criteria for autism spectrum disorder, should be evaluated for social (pragmatic) communication disorder. Specify if; With or without accompanying inteliectual impairment With or without accompanying language impairment Associated with a known medical or genetic condition or environmental factor

In what way are those restrictive. I in fact fall under all of these criteria. The only one you could question is whether I still fall under b. 2. But I do often say repeat the same phrases. But 5 years ago i would for sure meet this criteria. Like the only way I could imagine you'd think this is restrictive is if you think people who meet the criteria but it's not significant enough to cause problems in their life should be diagnosed as well. Which I don't think should be the case cause if they can function well enough there's no reason for a diagnosis. and That diagnosis could cause them problems.

| Severity Chart |
V V

Image


_________________
[color=#0066cc]ever changing evolving and growing
I am pieplup i have level 3 autism and a number of severe mental illnesses. I am rarely active on here anymore.
I run a discord for moderate-severely autistic people if anyone would like to join. You can also contact me on discord @Pieplup


Pieplup
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Dec 2015
Age: 23
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 2,658
Location: Maine

03 Sep 2020, 1:45 am

FranzOren wrote:
Pieplup wrote:
nca14 wrote:
I think that every developmental disorder characterised by social inadequacy and peculiarity should be classified in one subgroup of developmental disorders with "classic autism". I think that developmental disorders can be pervasive and severely problematic in life when they are only about socio-emotional area, without RRBIs (repetitive, restricted behaviors or interests) and sensory issues (especially asscoiated with idiosyncratic, other that usual, sensory processing). So I would say that marked schizoid tendencies since childhood (not starting in adolescence or adulthood) are enough to be classified as a pervasive developmental disorder.

Being classified as having PERVASIVE developmental disorder might help me a lot in my life since 2008. Without it I might be without adequate support, also in financial area. I have no "narrow mind", I am poor in managing with sensory discomfort (I HATE physical suffering) but I do not have unusual sensory processing - I just "not tolerate" physical pain or discomfort (for example during shower or after it).

I think that ASD, SCD and social NVLD are among conditions which should be grouped in one subcategory of developmental disorders in future editions of ICD or DSM (that subcategory should exclude developmental disorders which do not cause social inadequacy (ineptitude and, especially, diiminished social interest or motivation) and peculiarity ("quirkiness", "oddness") like dyslexia or dyscalculia).
I don't think learning disabilities should be grouped together with autism and as far as SCD why have a subcategory for two disorders. And secondly wouldn't having a developmental disability in an of itself cause you to be peculiar?
Ok so Intellectual disability. Could potentially cause social inadequecy. Global developmental delay would surely cause it. dyspraxia might depending on what definition of it we are using. there's developmental verbal dyspraxia which surely would, as it causes you to have difficulties talking and making sounds. I don't think we can include adhd, However. NVLD would cause social difficulties althought has never been included in the DSM or ICD. might be able to include tourrete's but i wouldnt' really say it would cause social inadequecy. Communication and language disorders would be included in this category. Scizophrenia would also be in it. So like 2 out of those wouldn't be added into this? A Category that includes the vast majority of developmental disorders is a pointless category.




I think it is because of this


\|/

"The diagnostic category of pervasive developmental disorders (PDD) refers to a group of disorders characterized by delays in the development of socialization and communication skills. Parents may note symptoms as early as infancy, although the typical age of onset is before 3 years of age."


It was written by National Institutes of Health ( a government website that studies in medical fields ).



https://www.ninds.nih.gov/disorders/all ... 20of%20age.

Assuming your problem is with the socialization and communication thing. Scizophrenia can cause problems with socialization but it isn't characterized by it. ID can cause problems with it but si nto charactorized it. The only ones you could say are, are Social communication disorder, Autism Spectrum Disorder and possibly language disorder. And There is no real reason for there to be a catagroy for those three. I don't see much point for said category.


_________________
[color=#0066cc]ever changing evolving and growing
I am pieplup i have level 3 autism and a number of severe mental illnesses. I am rarely active on here anymore.
I run a discord for moderate-severely autistic people if anyone would like to join. You can also contact me on discord @Pieplup


FranzOren
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 10 Jun 2019
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,357

03 Sep 2020, 1:50 am

That is makes sense, but what if the medical professionals think that you have history of developmental delay, even though you think it does not effect your daily life?



What should you in this situation?


What if it effects or causes or caused you distress from early childhood, but you think you don't have distress?


I have so many questions.



FranzOren
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 10 Jun 2019
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,357

03 Sep 2020, 1:52 am

For example, my friend D said he was diagnosed with Autism, but he thinks that it's stupid, because from his mind, it does not effect his daily life, but the doctors thought otherwise



Pieplup
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Dec 2015
Age: 23
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 2,658
Location: Maine

03 Sep 2020, 3:16 am

FranzOren wrote:
That is makes sense, but what if the medical professionals think that you have history of developmental delay, even though you think it does not effect your daily life?



What should you in this situation?


What if it effects or causes or caused you distress from early childhood, but you think you don't have distress?


I have so many questions.
I dont' think i understand the question. if you have a history of developmental delay ti might not affect your life. A developmental delay could just be you laern to speak a bit late but everything else is normal and wouldn't affect your daily life. As for what you should do in this situation. I dont' see why you need to do try to do something liek joining the military where that's not allowed.
and as for the last part. i assuse you mean if it caused you distress in the past but you no longer are distressed. See that's why the diagnose it based on your childhood because over time alot of autistici people start to adjust to their probelms and learn to deal with them.


_________________
[color=#0066cc]ever changing evolving and growing
I am pieplup i have level 3 autism and a number of severe mental illnesses. I am rarely active on here anymore.
I run a discord for moderate-severely autistic people if anyone would like to join. You can also contact me on discord @Pieplup


Pieplup
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Dec 2015
Age: 23
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 2,658
Location: Maine

03 Sep 2020, 3:18 am

FranzOren wrote:
For example, my friend D said he was diagnosed with Autism, but he thinks that it's stupid, because from his mind, it does not effect his daily life, but the doctors thought otherwise

I think my brother has similiar cognitive dissonance. I think he kind of ignores him being autistic. Which is weird to me because he always seems to be searching for things that set him out. but He ignores one of the biggest ones. I think alot of times people might not realize how much things affect them. and In a way it doesn't affect his daily life. bEcause his daily life is his daily life. and the effects of autism are part of it.


_________________
[color=#0066cc]ever changing evolving and growing
I am pieplup i have level 3 autism and a number of severe mental illnesses. I am rarely active on here anymore.
I run a discord for moderate-severely autistic people if anyone would like to join. You can also contact me on discord @Pieplup


FranzOren
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 10 Jun 2019
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,357

03 Sep 2020, 3:23 am

Exactly.

It makes a lot of sense.


He could have been diagnosed with Asperger's Syndrome before 2013, because of how he thinks of himself



Pieplup
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Dec 2015
Age: 23
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 2,658
Location: Maine

03 Sep 2020, 3:39 am

FranzOren wrote:
He could have been diagnosed with Asperger's Syndrome before 2013, because of how he thinks of himself

What exactly do you mean by this.


_________________
[color=#0066cc]ever changing evolving and growing
I am pieplup i have level 3 autism and a number of severe mental illnesses. I am rarely active on here anymore.
I run a discord for moderate-severely autistic people if anyone would like to join. You can also contact me on discord @Pieplup


nca14
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,364
Location: Poland

03 Sep 2020, 4:58 am

Pieplup wrote:
I don't think learning disabilities should be grouped together with autism and as far as SCD why have a subcategory for two disorders. And secondly wouldn't having a developmental disability in an of itself cause you to be peculiar?
Ok so Intellectual disability. Could potentially cause social inadequecy. Global developmental delay would surely cause it. dyspraxia might depending on what definition of it we are using. there's developmental verbal dyspraxia which surely would, as it causes you to have difficulties talking and making sounds. I don't think we can include adhd, However. NVLD would cause social difficulties althought has never been included in the DSM or ICD. might be able to include tourrete's but i wouldnt' really say it would cause social inadequecy. Communication and language disorders would be included in this category. Scizophrenia would also be in it. So like 2 out of those wouldn't be added into this? A Category that includes the vast majority of developmental disorders is a pointless category.

I personally think that definitely I have to disagree with your opinion. Not every developmental disability made a person "oddball" or "weirdo". People with ASD are often "named" as "weirdos" and "oddballs" by "normal" people. I think that there is the same with ones with SCD or "social" subtypes of NVLD. BUT someone who has just dyslexia or dyscalculia is (generally) not labelled "oddball" or "weirdo". Not every neurodevelopmental disorder has to make you eccentric or "bizarre".

Social NVLD and SCD definitely have to be grouped in one category with ASD IMO. The same with developmental, childhood-onset schizoid or schizotypal disorders or maybe any childhood-onset cluster A (odd-eccentric) personality disorder. For me the key features of PDDs and different sorts of autism are oddness and eccentricity since childhood, pre-adolescence.



Pieplup
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Dec 2015
Age: 23
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 2,658
Location: Maine

03 Sep 2020, 5:23 am

nca14 wrote:
Pieplup wrote:
I don't think learning disabilities should be grouped together with autism and as far as SCD why have a subcategory for two disorders. And secondly wouldn't having a developmental disability in an of itself cause you to be peculiar?
Ok so Intellectual disability. Could potentially cause social inadequecy. Global developmental delay would surely cause it. dyspraxia might depending on what definition of it we are using. there's developmental verbal dyspraxia which surely would, as it causes you to have difficulties talking and making sounds. I don't think we can include adhd, However. NVLD would cause social difficulties althought has never been included in the DSM or ICD. might be able to include tourrete's but i wouldnt' really say it would cause social inadequecy. Communication and language disorders would be included in this category. Scizophrenia would also be in it. So like 2 out of those wouldn't be added into this? A Category that includes the vast majority of developmental disorders is a pointless category.

I personally think that definitely I have to disagree with your opinion. Not every developmental disability made a person "oddball" or "weirdo". People with ASD are often "named" as "weirdos" and "oddballs" by "normal" people. I think that there is the same with ones with SCD or "social" subtypes of NVLD. BUT someone who has just dyslexia or dyscalculia is (generally) not labelled "oddball" or "weirdo". Not every neurodevelopmental disorder has to make you eccentric or "bizarre".

Social NVLD and SCD definitely have to be grouped in one category with ASD IMO. The same with developmental, childhood-onset schizoid or schizotypal disorders or maybe any childhood-onset cluster A (odd-eccentric) personality disorder. For me the key features of PDDs and different sorts of autism are oddness and eccentricity since childhood, pre-adolescence.

[color=#0077cc] You aren't seeing the words as what they are but are seeing the words as what society made tem. By definition someone with a developmental disorder would be odd weird or eccentric. By definition... g


_________________
[color=#0066cc]ever changing evolving and growing
I am pieplup i have level 3 autism and a number of severe mental illnesses. I am rarely active on here anymore.
I run a discord for moderate-severely autistic people if anyone would like to join. You can also contact me on discord @Pieplup


nca14
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,364
Location: Poland

03 Sep 2020, 6:26 am

Someone with "non-pervasive" developmental disorder can be generally more disabled (only due to mental disorders) than someone who has relatively mild clinical autism spectrum disorder, relatively mild clinical pervasive developmental disorder.

For me SCD and ASD are different sorts of the same condition and I think that classifying SCD as just a "specific developmental disorder" and ASD as a "pervasive developmental disorder" is for me obviously and definitely unfair to ones who have "just SCD" and may negatively affect the quality of life of people with "SCD" (for example because of lack of, also financial, benefits associated with having PDD/ASD (but I know that not everyone with PDD diagnosis has to have such benefits)).

SCD is significantly more like ASD than dyslexia in my opinion. People with dyslexia rather are not "socially inept weirdos"! I suppose that those with SCD may be named as such, like those with clinical ASD.

I am now rather AGAINST the term "pervasive developmental disorder" (and also AGAINST the term "specific developmental disorder) because it, for me, appears to "discriminate" people with pretty severe "specific" disorders who have more general life difficulties than people with milder, but still clinical, "pervasive" disorders.

Why only individuals with ASD are labelled as "requiring support", "requiring substantial support", "requiring very substantial support"? Why not to do the same with individuals with other mental disorders, especially ones which are similar to ASD (and for me can be counted as "other sorts" of disorders like PDD or ASD and not as other sorts of scholastic disabilities like dyscalculia and dyslexia)? It would be more fair IMO.



FranzOren
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 10 Jun 2019
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,357

03 Sep 2020, 8:44 am

Exactly



FranzOren
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 10 Jun 2019
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,357

03 Sep 2020, 8:44 am

That is my point



FranzOren
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 10 Jun 2019
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,357

03 Sep 2020, 8:46 am

Pieplup wrote:
FranzOren wrote:
He could have been diagnosed with Asperger's Syndrome before 2013, because of how he thinks of himself

What exactly do you mean by this.




Mostly people who are Autistic, but they don't think they are Autistic, sounds more like Asperger's Syndrome to me