what do you think about "generalization"?
kraftiekortie wrote:
I feel generalizing is a poor substitute for studying an issue properly and thoroughly.
What I though you meant was: people who are "normal" often learn quicker and therefore might refuse to study a subject deeper. Many of us on the other hand have to focus more on the fundamentals before we learn something. "Normal" people often refuse to do this.
Dandansson wrote:
kraftiekortie wrote:
I feel generalizing is a poor substitute for studying an issue properly and thoroughly.
What I though you meant was: people who are "normal" often learn quicker and therefore might refuse to study a subject deeper. Many of us on the other hand have to focus more on the fundamentals before we learn something. "Normal" people often refuse to do this._________________
The mere fact that science may not yet adequately explain an object, event, or experience does not mean the immediate explanation should automatically default to a conspiratorial, extraterrestrial, paranormal, or supernatural cause.
Dandansson wrote:
Fnord wrote:
Dandansson wrote:
Fnord wrote:
Dandansson wrote:
kraftiekortie wrote:
By saying "all black people smell," you're generalizing....and you're wrong. By saying "all women want to do is get rich off a man," you generalizing, and you're wrong.
yes but we are talking about how you can have issues with generelaization, ie doing it too much or too little, right?_________________
The mere fact that science may not yet adequately explain an object, event, or experience does not mean the immediate explanation should automatically default to a conspiratorial, extraterrestrial, paranormal, or supernatural cause.
Fnord wrote:
Dandansson wrote:
Fnord wrote:
Dandansson wrote:
Fnord wrote:
Dandansson wrote:
kraftiekortie wrote:
By saying "all black people smell," you're generalizing....and you're wrong. By saying "all women want to do is get rich off a man," you generalizing, and you're wrong.
yes but we are talking about how you can have issues with generelaization, ie doing it too much or too little, right?So you see ASD as just another way of functioning? I am asking because some people do. They really do.
People with disabilities might have difficulty "generalizing" in the sense of how you used the term "generalizing."
This is why hands-on therapy is so useful for people with disabilities. They might take a little longer to "get it." But, through proper instruction, they frequently do "get it" eventually.
There is a problem, amongst many people, with "patience" when it comes to the learning of people with disabilities. Like I said, it might take a little longer----but the motivated disabled individual often, eventually, "gets it," and might "get it" even more than a "normal" person because of the considerable effort expended by them.
kraftiekortie wrote:
People with disabilities might have difficulty "generalizing" in the sense of how you used the term "generalizing."
This is why hands-on therapy is so useful for people with disabilities. They might take a little longer to "get it." But, through proper instruction, they frequently do "get it" eventually.
There is a problem, amongst many people, with "patience" when it comes to the learning of people with disabilities. Like I said, it might take a little longer----but the motivated disabled individual often, eventually, "gets it," and might "get it" even more than a "normal" person because of the considerable effort expended by them.
This is why hands-on therapy is so useful for people with disabilities. They might take a little longer to "get it." But, through proper instruction, they frequently do "get it" eventually.
There is a problem, amongst many people, with "patience" when it comes to the learning of people with disabilities. Like I said, it might take a little longer----but the motivated disabled individual often, eventually, "gets it," and might "get it" even more than a "normal" person because of the considerable effort expended by them.
interesting
Dandansson wrote:
Fnord wrote:
Dandansson wrote:
Fnord wrote:
Dandansson wrote:
Fnord wrote:
Dandansson wrote:
kraftiekortie wrote:
By saying "all black people smell," you're generalizing....and you're wrong. By saying "all women want to do is get rich off a man," you generalizing, and you're wrong.
yes but we are talking about how you can have issues with generelaization, ie doing it too much or too little, right?_________________
The mere fact that science may not yet adequately explain an object, event, or experience does not mean the immediate explanation should automatically default to a conspiratorial, extraterrestrial, paranormal, or supernatural cause.
Fnord wrote:
Dandansson wrote:
Fnord wrote:
Dandansson wrote:
Fnord wrote:
Dandansson wrote:
Fnord wrote:
Dandansson wrote:
kraftiekortie wrote:
By saying "all black people smell," you're generalizing....and you're wrong. By saying "all women want to do is get rich off a man," you generalizing, and you're wrong.
yes but we are talking about how you can have issues with generelaization, ie doing it too much or too little, right?