What are people with Aspergers good at?
Sweetleaf
Veteran

Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 35,155
Location: Somewhere in Colorado
I could be good at various things if someone would f*cking hire me....
seriously I am the sort of person that they could just show me what to do once and I'd get it. It is just hard to find a way to put my skills on the table if no one will even give me a chance because of my lack of social skills. Also I have a good work ethic, sure when not working I can be lazy but if I have a job I want to do it well, I am not a lazy worker...I am lazy on my off time but on a job I want to do as best I can even work above and beyond.
LIke seriously I even find breaks a little annoying because then I have to stop doing the thing I'm doing, even if I'm on a good roll of doing it. Of course with so many hours you need a break here and there, or you get overworked, but yeah idk I have a good work ethic like at work I don't want to do any less than the best I can. But seems good work ethic and attitude is not enough to get or keep a job much of times if you don't got the social aspect.
_________________
Metal never dies. \m/
^^ Very much this ^^
There are some things that come more easily to me, as a result of certain qualities of my autism - ADHD helps me read through large amounts of text very rapidly, ODC helps me be meticulous and detailed - but there are many things I've worked hard at, and became good at despite my autism, such as speaking in front of large groups (which I now enjoy) or handling chaotic situations.
Regardless of whether my autism enhanced or hindered my ability to learn a skill, every skill I have, I have because I worked at it, developed it, practiced it, and maintained it, for long periods of time. Many skills require upkeep. So called "natural ability" can make skills require less effort to learn and excel at, and less practice to maintain - but it's very much like being tall and playing basketball, or having long legs and being a runner - while they do help in general, you don't NEED them to be good at those things. Being naturally good at things is the exception, not the rule. Most skill is developed or cultivated, even if it's not readily visible.
Many times when we look at other people who are good at things, we see the end result of them being good, but we don't see all the practice and effort that went into getting that good. It has been said that it takes 10,000 hours of practice to become truly skilled at something. If you've tried something "a buncha times" or spent "several weeks", or "a couple hours a week", practicing something, you've still got a looooong ways to go before you can claim you "can't" get better. The average person spends several hours a day over several months to get proficient at something. People with amazing skill have often spent years, if not decades, of time and effort doing the thing they're good at.
Additionally, in order to improve with practice, you have to practice doing the right thing, the right way. If you practice doing something the wrong way, you just get better at getting the same wrong outcome. Life isn't like a video game where all you have to do is go through the motions over and over, ability magically increases as a result, and boom, you now have a new skill. The quality, content, depth, and diligence of the practice make a huge difference. Many skills are perishable, and if you don't keep practicing them regularly, they fade.
Skills aren't something you just "have". They're build, cultivated, maintained, practiced, refined, and shaped. Even breathing can be a skill, if you intentionally do it in a specific way for a specific reason, as in athletes who control their breathing. When you get good enough at a skill, and practice it often enough, you can do it almost reflexively, without thinking.
Unfortunately, too many people stop trying when they hit the limits of their comfort, long before they hit the limits of their capability.
It is different for different people, but I am really good at proof reading, at the expence of me not being able to skim through texts, and being a slow reader.
/Mats
I could point out that It's supposed to be autism level 1/2 and kanner's is autism level 2/3 though techincally based on diagnosis criteria both could be iteher of three.
_________________
[color=#0066cc]ever changing evolving and growing
I am pieplup i have level 3 autism and a number of severe mental illnesses. I am rarely active on here anymore.
I run a discord for moderate-severely autistic people if anyone would like to join. You can also contact me on discord @Pieplup
ProfessorJohn
Veteran

Joined: 26 Jun 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,153
Location: The Room at the end of 2001
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
What are good jobs for crippled people? |
18 Jun 2025, 2:31 pm |
Hello all, good to be here! |
54 minutes ago |
What's good? |
06 Jul 2025, 9:24 am |
Good intentions |
17 Jun 2025, 7:38 pm |