2ukenkerl wrote:
Angelus-Mortis wrote:
They forced us to do this course called "PE" (which I really think should be renamed "Sports" because it's not really much of "Physical Education", if you think about it.
You have THAT right! I know a LOT about physical education! I know the mechanics, biology, chemistry, etc... Some even runs COUNTER to what they "teach" in P.E.! P.E. teachers, at least in the US aren't considered to be too bright!
The only thing remotely close to "Physical Education" that they taught in high school was a tiny unit on muscles that we even made a project out of--and that only happened ONCE in one grade--the rest was spent on exercises not unlike going to a gym and doing push ups, sit ups, using the machines, etc. Heck, you're right about learning more about that from biology and chemistry. "Physical Education" sounds more like an applied physiology class on what happens to your body when you exercise. I live in Canada, so you can say that most North American PE teachers aren't too bright. What "PE" really needs is some more brains and less brawn from natural talent.
Quote:
They should teach more nutrition, and the idea that most growth occurs when you AREN'T exercising. Too many think that doing pushups every day, for example, is great for the triceps. It is better if you improve nutrition and do it every other day.
The sad part is that you could probably learn more about "PE" from a women's health magazine or other magazines on exercise or even stuff on the Internet than you can from a "PE" class in high school. In fact, there are probably so many people who are overweight and too intimidated by either competition from other more athletic peers, and the bad PE teachers that they probably try to skip PE class or find a way out of it. You'd get more out of exercising on your own free time than trying to put up with the said mentioned problems. I know people argue that PE classes encourage people to exercise, but not when the stuff I mentioned is a problem. Besides, I get more exercise out of rollerblading on my own, which is something I'm relatively good at and enjoy than attending PE classes and doing stuff I suck at and don't benefit much out of. There are probably lots of "athletes" who only do one kind of sport and still stay fit from doing it. They make you do everything in PE class, yet ironically enough, it's not enough exposure for someone who only does rollerblading.
Quote:
I will never forget one idiot I had for a "P.E. teacher" in the 2nd grade. He once gave me the WORST glare because he tried to cut in line, for lunch, and was REAL close to me, and obstructive. I HAD to cough, and he just made things worse, and I ended up coughing in his milk which he put RIGHT up to me! Frankly, things could have been worse.
Anyway, he tried to "teach" us how to do a standing broad jump! He ended up ripping his meniscus, and had to have SURGERY! HOW do you think kids felt about THAT! What if WE had that problem?
Oh, the irony. I think we had a crappy elementary school PE teacher as well. I think people didn't like him so much that some of the kids started spreading rumors about how he "molested" this girl during class by touching her ass.
Quote:
And I am surprised that girls get that kind of harsh treatment outside of group sports. HECK, you can't all be cheerleaders or gymnasts.
Being a cheerleader is the last thing I'd want to be. Actually though, the lamest unit in our PE classes was square dancing. It might not sound so bad because it's not strenuous, but the music is horrible, and the moves (in my opinion) were lame. I think I'd rather play DDR instead. At least the music doesn't suck, and I have a choice.