hello ye all
great test this, fanks
clockwise, however
when i first got to the link the screen only showed the top - which of course sets attention in motion somewhere in the loft and elsewhere, granted - the dancer was then and for that time turning anticlockwise
when i got the whole picture i could not get out of the clockwise 'paradigm'
but felt frustrated as i had seen the other way, so back to only top view with obvious attention deficit due to priority issues
remained a frustrated clockwise male right-hemispheroid
got sidetracked by text left, read up on difference (IE searched for interpretation) and then
the dancer ever at it as steady as a clock, somewhere with my eyes falling from the wider second line over the listing down to the then topmost right leg which,suddenly, started anticlockwise downward, to finish back at around one and slip back into clockwisely
the l-r properties had already started me pondering and bemused with contradictory input: the interesting thing for me now is whether to conclude left temporal trouble, which at face value does not fit: but o yes it does & and i do love the fact that contradictions rarely arewhat they proclaim to be
the interesting thing for you is that it took me just a little bit of training and experimenting; i can now start anticlockwise and hold for a while (maybe stare instead of focus, see if you can somehow vary the level of focus-attention) whatever you do, pay priority attention to any onscreen task but leave the dancer at it and just check occasionally, as you would the babyroom on your way to the kitchen
the dancer is just like many of us and most animals: she does not like to be seen straight, but she might bend over backward for you if you just leave her somewhere in the fringes of your perception [out of sight=]
i have not (yet) been able to produce a true switch
Ourselves! Alone!
no more oblio; 03 forever
_________________
a point in every direction is the same as no point at all - or is it
may your god forgive you