Icheb wrote:
I had to think a long time about this question. When picturing the future, I always imagined that I would either be fabulously rich or poor as a church-mouse, and that the world would either be a utopia or a dystopia, never anything in between. In politics too (both nationally and internationally) I tend to think of a particular faction as either “good” or “bad”. And when steeling myself for a new experience, I usually expect it to be either wonderful or horrible, never so-so. I do think in black or white, to a far bigger extent than I’ve realized.
Yeah, me too.
It's so much harder to imagine a moderate, "average" outcome or possible version.
Didn't mean to go off on tangent, but...
Extremes (whether appealing or aversive) are what tend to get a creature or person's attention, make an impression, and stimulate creativity. Trying to picture or describe situation that's "neither here nor there", "somewhat this, a bit of that", or the like-while probably more accurate to life's complexity & subtleties-is also greatly difficult for brain to comprehend & represent.
Thus, humans think in overly simplified symbols (esp. using words), for sake of efficiency. Otherwise, we'd get bogged down in exquisitely detailing (to get things "just right") one decision or scenario and never move forward onto next challenge. See, merely to say these things I had to exaggerate & bluntly generalize even though I know there are exceptions & qualifications which aren't properly summarized in my statements. If I say something that's perfectly moderate, balanced, even, neutral, non-extreme I end up saying nothing at all.
_________________
*"I don't know what it is, but I know what it isn't."*