Theory of Mind
My experience is that we each model the world a bit differently. When I get to know someone I construct a model of that person in my head from my interaction with the person and thereafter modify the model as I get to understand that person's reactions better. But when that person dies it is necessary to eliminate the model so in effect the pain of grief is the actual killing of the dynamic model in my head and replacing it with a static one. Although I do not deny the reality of the world outside much of my interaction with it is through the models in my head.
I agree that assuming animals lack minds / souls is just a self-serving anthropocentric rationalization. I see no justification at all. It’s just pure assertion / assumption on behalf of human society.
In theory I could even extend the possibility of sentience to non-living systems as well. From an outside, scientific viewpoint there doesn't seem to be a real firm dividing line even between living and non-living. A numerical AI program on a computer could even be considered sentient in some way. There’s just no way to know without making a blind assertion.
The cat, to catch, the ball on the table must do trig calculations, and he does them. Not consciously of course, he never studied trig at school. But his mind, in some part (module, genetically provided piece of his brain) is equipped with such calculating faculties. This is what theory of mind is about.

I was thinking that "Theory of Mind" was either when you:
1. Visualize someone else doing exactly the same thing you are doing, maybe even in an arial view... imagine looking down on them doing exactly what you are doing and asking yourself the question "What do I think of this person"? as a way to self-evaluate? OR....
2. maybe, it means trying to put yourself in another's shoes and in their life circumstances and try to project how you would feel if the same thing (s) was happening to you?
I think it might be choice #2 the more I think about it... I think Theory of Mind os putting yourself in another's shoes.. I'm going to read all the posts on this thread now and see if someone else said that..
Quoting Rainstorm5:
- Why am I looking out at the world through my particular eyes and not someone else's?
- Is everyone else aware of the same?
- What makes me ME?
I never could articulate these questions, but theory of mind comes pretty close. I never once thought I was looking at the world as if it were a snowglobe (or as a main character in some kind of personal movie), but even so, how did I become ME? Why am I n this particular body and not a fish or a tree or something else? Then this all spirals down into the unavoidable question: When I die, do I go on? Do I (my consciousness) then become someone else? Or do I just simply shut off like a candle snuffed in a dark room, staring at the blackness of eternity? I remember I once brought up this same topic in another NT forum and everyone summarily wrote me off as being self-centered. Guess I'd better stop now while I'm ahead. These questions bother me in the middle of the night when I'm laying there, staring at the ceiling. They usually herald an oncoming tsunami of depression.
These are perfectly legitimate questions and I think most intelligent people would speculate on the answers to them. Certainly philosophers have asked these same questions and built whole philosophies around them. If you didn't ask yourself such questions you would be a rather dull and robotic individual. Inquiring Minds Want to Know.
I, on the other hand, have often speculated on what it would be like if I were the only one who existed and everything else was a creation of my own mind. The operative word being "speculated" and not "believed". As long as such thinking remains speculative , I see no harm in it. Examining the nature of reality, our own and others is a form of higher consciousness and creativity. It would be a pretty dreary world without it.
If you don't have a "theory of mind" you tend to believe that people think just like you, and are mystified when they don't.
Z
I tend to give everyone the benefit of the doubt when it comes to attained knowledge..This has caused me more grief than just assuming them to be ignorant has.
If people on the autistic spectrum are supposed to lack theory of mind, then I must not have AS because I know that others have different beliefs from my own.
There's a little more to it than that. Here's a good article I found on the subject (ASDs & theory of mind), which explains the problems involved with autistic children developing theory of mind. Eventually they can and do develop a sense of theory of mind as they mature, but even then it's not as advanced as that of the average neurotypical child.
Link: http://www.iidc.indiana.edu/irca/education/TheoryofMind.html
_________________
Terminal Outsider, rogue graphic designer & lunatic fringe.
Descartes' Meditations on First Philosophy. The answer is to duck the question and just "feel" that God is no deceiver, that everything real is in fact real and not an illusion. On theory of mind, over the years it has become apparent to me that NTs do not distinguish what they feel from who they are. I'm not sure that is why NTs have theory of mind, or why Aspies do not, but that oneness of identity with emotion is alien to me. Feeling sad or happy or angry or embarassed is like feeling hot or cold or hungry or tired, it is something that will pass as circumstances; NTs have told me that when they think of making another person angry, they think of themselves being an angry person, not a person who is angry as a result of a stimulus. I think that is the theory of mind I am lacking, if that makes any sense.
These are perfectly legitimate questions and I think most intelligent people would speculate on the answers to them. Certainly philosophers have asked these same questions and built whole philosophies around them. If you didn't ask yourself such questions you would be a rather dull and robotic individual. Inquiring Minds Want to Know.
I don't like to think of myself as dull and robotic, but I suppose it depends on who you ask... I spend a lot of time inside my own mind, though, so that might mean I'm not much fun to be around in real life.
I've entertained similar thoughts from time to time as well, but they are usually dismissed quickly. My parents were both in the mental health industry (in one form or another) so I always saw thoughts of this nature as aberrant. Why? Because my mom said so. I don't see anything wrong with thinking such things, as long as it doesn't dissociate someone from reality completely.
_________________
Terminal Outsider, rogue graphic designer & lunatic fringe.
