kerryt84 wrote:
I'm sorry if I have offended you SotiCoto. I am just thinking purely from a medical, and what I thought was a logical view. I work with children on the spectrum and professionals I have worked with have talked about it in that way so I thought that was the correct way to describe it. You obviously disagree, and of course you have the right to your opinion.
I don't get offended; I get bemused.
And even if I were getting offended, the fault would be mine and not your own. You're not a mind-reader, and I don't ascribe to the absurd neurotypical tendency to place the blame on those without the choice rather than those with it.
There is no "correct" way to describe it. There is simply the pro-neurotypical way, and the pro-autistic way, and I ascribe to the latter... primarily in defiance of the overly prevalent former. Academically and logically speaking, I know that "value" is a delusion and neither end is any better or worse... but I do have my personal bias to take into account, and the necessity of opposition for the status quo.
No matter how much they may assume they know.... most medical "specialists" on the subject will tend to be neurotypicals, and thus have the natural neurotypical bias against all that is not perfectly normal and average. Yes, they will promote that view, so no... I cannot really blame you for mimicing them. Consider this extra data to contribute to your own particular viewpoint that they might have denied you.
.
Last edited by SotiCoto on 29 May 2008, 5:30 am, edited 1 time in total.