Bradleigh wrote:
But what is reality, is it truth, how can we be sure that it is truth, scientests are always makeing asumptions, in my point almost nothing can be counted on. Every single person has to set there own truths and fill in parts that can not be decided on.
Well, like I said, we all may PERCEIVE reality differently, but if we don't make that one assumption - that we're all differently perceiving the same reality - then there is no possibility of communication, of understanding, of being able to do anything. So, sure, Science is based on assumptions, but they're assumptions from which you can make predictions & these predictions will hold true in every case. & if you discover a case where something you predicted doesn't hold true, well then you discard the assumption from which you derived the prediction & try to find another assumption that will hold true for that case, & for all previous cases where your discarded assumption did hold true. This is the only way we have of knowing things, & to theorise that the original base assumption is false, well, I don't see where that gets you? It might, in a technical sense, be impossible to disprove, but there's no reason to think it's true, & it isn't helpful.
Our 'own truths' is a meaningless phrase, if it's just true for you, it isn't true. When people say 'it's true for me', I hear 'it's my opinion, & I'm not interested in examining whether it's true or not'.