slowmutant wrote:
By the way, being blunt IS being rude.
I would disagree with that. Providing someone with a unsolicited, negative opinion of their hair, clothes, or body, is both blunt and rude. However, telling someone directly when they have done something which upsets you (rather than say, avoiding them or being passive-aggressive), is blunt, but not rude (assuming you didn't say it in a rude way). My friends in college used to tell me I was blunt, even when I was trying to be subtle, but because I wasn't rude, my bluntness amused them rather than irritating them.
I also appreciate bluntness in other people. If I do something to upset someone, I don't want them to get all quiet and wait for me to figure it out. If they tell me what I did, then I can apologize, and try to avoid doing it in the future. There definitely is a difference between being blunt, and being rude. I find passive-aggressive behavior to be very frustrating and counter-productive. Because guess what- I will *not* be able to figure out on my own what I did wrong. So I will ask someone right up front, "What's wrong?" Perhaps some would consider that to be blunt (my friends in college did), but I think it just makes sense.
I have tried to be subtle in the past, but my friends found my attempts very transparent. So I currently have no choice but to be blunt. However, I try very hard not to be rude. I'm perfectly capable of telling white lies when the situation calls for it, and I always try to be complimentary, unless I think the person is actually looking for honest feedback.