Warsie wrote:
okay, I get it. It was like xkcd or something related then?
Not really. It was about pretending to be Konrad Lorenz, Niko Tinbergen, or Jane Goodall, using the neighborhood dogs (which all ran around loose) as study subjects. The notebooks full of graphs, if consolidated, would show you which dogs were friends with which other dogs and who dominated whom, and the way certain dogs (very like me, now and then) were 'leaders' in the company of certain others yet got beat up when yet another came along and totally changed the dynamic by its presence. I think my mother, an ornithologist, still has them. She thought they were amazing. I should ask her, 'cause I'm wondering now if they really made sense.
Come to think of it, this may tie in to the stuff that folks were talking about in the recent thread about styles of play. I'd draw huge maps (a dozen pages, taped together) of landscapes and make tiny paper cut-out creatures to inhabit them, and move the figures about the maps. I was pretending to be tracking the movements of wildlife with radio transmitters. My parents thought I was making board-games and didn't understand why the maps were on grids and had movement-rates for the various types of creatures recorded in the margins, but there were no rules about what the little animal 'characters' might do, and I was completely unable to explain to someone else how to 'play.'