define 'really'
define 'to love'
(apart from syntactical functionality, the verb might not be quite the same as the noun)
first response to OP: NONE
voice Randy Newman:
I don't know what love is, I don't know what love is..; THEY know what love is
however: i am so verbose and verbosely confident that i have always claimed
that i - as opposed to all great thinkers & writers alltimes allwheres -
would be capable of defining what love is -
on the proviso that i had once actually physically experienced that feeling they call love
alexithymia [lit.: no words for feelings] is what set me on the course to auti-selfdiscovery:
any sort of problem in relating verbally [mentally/psychologically-aware]
with what the body 'feels'
[it might be a problem to do with one's proprioceptive sense (6th sense)]
[i prefer to think of it as related with autistic monotrack thought, and as such:
essentially related to the core problem of autism:
lack of self, which must result from a lack of 'binding', i.e. multitracking thought processing
i also (off topic) believe that all of this can be so easily 'translated' in terminology
of mirror neurons; i would say that mirror neurons are the cause&result of multitracking thought:
i would say that 'multitracking' would be what is mirroring
by mirroring, one would experience the separate realities of monosensed perception in communion
and that would be essential in overcoming alexithymia
i would also hazard to guess that this 'communing' constitutes love
non-socially: for self
socially: when these mirroring processes 'agree', harmonize, with those of ONE other (human) being
that would allow for differentiating between love and sex:
sex in itself would involve less mirroring processes, certainly in the social respect
'true' love could then be 'measured' in the larger amount, variety and depth of mirroring processing
back to alexithymia: eg (?):
that pit in my stomach - it may have taken me fifty years to identify it as 'fear' (or anxiety)
and not 'hunger' - which has a slightly different position (slightly more central and deeper)
and a slightly different 'texture of feeling'
(hunger is slightly more 'acute', in that anxiety has a duller feel - it's a shade of difference though)
more references:
The Collectors, What Love (Suite) (1968): "love is masculine violence"
[great album] (in context, i would say: love is precisely NOT male violence, male lust is)
gosh, had one more, maybe it will get back to me
_________________
a point in every direction is the same as no point at all - or is it
may your god forgive you