Page 2 of 3 [ 48 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

ToughDiamond
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Sep 2008
Age: 72
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,534

28 May 2009, 8:15 am

elderwanda wrote:
I'll try to give an example of how I see ToM, including the ways in which it confuses me. Let's say I know someone who really loves baseball. Now, personally, I think baseball is stupid, and can't really relate much to baseball-lovers in general. My hypothetical baseball-loving friend really, REALLY wants to go to the game on Sunday...but he has already made a commitment to drive his mother to her knitting club. Or something like that. Now, I personally would not be disappointed if I missed some silly baseball game, but I can understand and accept that he might be disappointed. I would not feel his disappointment, UNLESS he was someone who I cared very deeply about, and then I would feel a certain amount of sadness at the fact that he was feeling disappointed, and missing out on something that was special to him. It would be much easier to feel his disappointment if, instead of a baseball game, it was an activity that I enjoy.

I was actually going to post exactly that analogy 8O But my post was already pretty too long, so it got removed in the cutting stage. But that's just how I'd try to handle a "baseball situation" - I can't relate to the loss of a baseball-spectating situation, because in my case I'd just be glad of having the time freed up for something more interesting, but I can relate to a person who's lost an opportunity they'd set their heart on. So I'd delete "baseball game" and insert "music performance" and then I immediately understand how gutted he must feel.

Quote:
Now...where does the ToM come in? Do I have ToM because I could understand and accept that he feels disappointed, albeit not actually feel the disappointment myself? Or do I lack ToM, and that's why I'm not experiencing a twang of disappointment at his missing the game? And if that's what ToM is, then where are all these NTs who supposedly have it? Wouldn't being able to know how other people are feeling impede people from wanting to step all over each other, and claw their way to the top?

Good question - to me it seems like it's more to do with not happening to share the obsession with baseball, and while I accept a great many people love the game, there must be NTs out there who don't. But I don't know whether our "workaround" is evidence of theory of mind or not. Maybe it's to do with the fact that as adults we've developed coping strategies and can therefore mimic the NT response in such cases. I suspect that NTs do the same trick but they never had to learn it, they'd perhaps do it much more intuitively, with their innate understanding of community.

Being able to know how other people are feeling could impede competitive behaviour, though it could also be used cynically as a way of competing and controlling. It's not really answering your question, but I've always felt the human race has a huge problem in deciding whether to co-operate or to compete, i.e. it never seems able to quite make up its mind what sort of a creature it is.

I agree that this ToM construct could turn out to be more trouble than it's worth. Maybe the Sally-Ann test works for full-blown autistic children, but apart from that I'm not sure ToM is very useful at all.



b9
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Aug 2008
Age: 53
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,003
Location: australia

28 May 2009, 8:41 am

"theory of mind" is the theory that some people have a mind.



marshall
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,752
Location: Turkey

28 May 2009, 11:32 am

fiddlerpianist wrote:
ooOoOoOAnaOoOoOoo wrote:
That wasn't the type of ToM I was refering to in my post. I was refering to the ToM involved in looking at someone and knowing, sorta, what they want. That is something I am clueless about and it has been noted many times by those who know me. It's not so much understanding someone will be disappointed if they don't get to go somewhere they want to go just because I don't have an interest. It's more about all these sideways glances and subtle hints. Like, when someone wants me to stop talking without actually saying "shut up". I don't realize they want me to stop until they say "shut up" and then my feelings are hurt because they were so rude. Then I get a bad impression of them based on that and their impression of me is that I can't take a subtle hint or I'm dumb or something.

My friend called it "the social script" which she said no one gave me a copy.

As someone who is more "on the border" of autism than many here, I have gotten pretty good at this over the years. Not in all cases, but in many. There are some instances where I am reading someone, however, at a "gut" level, yet I don't trust my "gut" for whatever reason (maybe because it's been wrong so often before.)

I'm wondering if you can explain what you're doing when you "read" someone? I think I'm the same way in terms of this particular trait but I don't see any way to test it. Usually what happens is I don't know how to react to whatever I think I'm reading and I get highly self-conscious.



fiddlerpianist
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Apr 2009
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,821
Location: The Autistic Hinterlands

28 May 2009, 1:36 pm

marshall wrote:
fiddlerpianist wrote:
As someone who is more "on the border" of autism than many here, I have gotten pretty good at this over the years. Not in all cases, but in many. There are some instances where I am reading someone, however, at a "gut" level, yet I don't trust my "gut" for whatever reason (maybe because it's been wrong so often before.)

I'm wondering if you can explain what you're doing when you "read" someone? I think I'm the same way in terms of this particular trait but I don't see any way to test it. Usually what happens is I don't know how to react to whatever I think I'm reading and I get highly self-conscious.

I read their eyes and their face. Interestingly, it appears that most people here have very little trouble doing this. Check out the results of this thread: Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test. I scored a 27.

I think it's the trusting what we're reading that gets a lot more difficult because other non-verbal cues often come into play.


_________________
"That leap of logic should have broken his legs." - Janissy


ToughDiamond
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Sep 2008
Age: 72
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,534

28 May 2009, 2:44 pm

^
That's always my problem too - I never feel I can trust any of my insights. But I've heard that good therapists always check out their intuitions with the client before believing anything. So what makes NTs so smart that they don't need to bother checking anything?



marshall
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,752
Location: Turkey

28 May 2009, 2:54 pm

fiddlerpianist wrote:
marshall wrote:
fiddlerpianist wrote:
As someone who is more "on the border" of autism than many here, I have gotten pretty good at this over the years. Not in all cases, but in many. There are some instances where I am reading someone, however, at a "gut" level, yet I don't trust my "gut" for whatever reason (maybe because it's been wrong so often before.)

I'm wondering if you can explain what you're doing when you "read" someone? I think I'm the same way in terms of this particular trait but I don't see any way to test it. Usually what happens is I don't know how to react to whatever I think I'm reading and I get highly self-conscious.

I read their eyes and their face. Interestingly, it appears that most people here have very little trouble doing this. Check out the results of this thread: Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test. I scored a 27.

I think it's the trusting what we're reading that gets a lot more difficult because other non-verbal cues often come into play.

I also do well at the "reading the eyes" test. I think I scored over 30 the first time I did it. I've also done some other tests out of curiosity and I generally get a score somewhere between the average male and average female score, i.e. I do better than the average NT male.

I feel way too emotionally neurotic (I'm a rigid perfectionist) and just plain un-social to be anywhere near NT though. I'm atrocious at making appropriate small-talk with new people. I never think of the right questions to ask in the moment. Minutes later I often realize that I should have asked something but then it's too late.

When the conversation is on me or one of my interests I communicate just fine and people enjoy listening to me. As an adult I know how to talk without boring people or making them annoyed. Yet when it comes to getting other people to talk about themselves I always fail. I smile and nod a lot but never think of much to add unless I have a similar experience to share. This is the feature of my personality that comes across as "lacking empathy". Am I really missing cues or am I just self-centered? NT's just seem to get a lot more energy out of asking people questions. I get bored. I guess I'm just really self-absorbed.



Last edited by marshall on 28 May 2009, 3:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Greentea
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Jun 2007
Age: 63
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,745
Location: Middle East

28 May 2009, 3:03 pm

marshall wrote:
Am I really missing cues or am I just self-centered?


They're one and the same thing. Our center of gravity is more internal than external. NTs' is more external than internal. We are more self-centered than NTs, which makes us miss social cues. We miss social cues, which makes us more inward-bound. It's all the same phenomenon of being more attuned to ourselves than to other people, of having a very weak people-radar and a very strong self-radar. In extremely strong cases, autistics don't even talk or listen to others. In the mildest cases, an autistic person just misses a social cue here and there, fails to attune to others here and there, but nothing that can break the natural flow of NT relating.

This is why I had to smile when the shrink said "that's not AS, that's a weak motivation to relate to people". Because he was actually defining AS by the latter. Only, he doesn't know enough about autism to realize that.


_________________
So-called white lies are like fake jewelry. Adorn yourself with them if you must, but expect to look cheap to a connoisseur.


marshall
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,752
Location: Turkey

28 May 2009, 3:39 pm

Greentea wrote:
marshall wrote:
Am I really missing cues or am I just self-centered?


They're one and the same thing. Our center of gravity is more internal than external. NTs' is more external than internal. We are more self-centered than NTs, which makes us miss social cues. We miss social cues, which makes us more inward-bound. It's all the same phenomenon of being more attuned to ourselves than to other people, of having a very weak people-radar and a very strong self-radar. In extremely strong cases, autistics don't even talk or listen to others. In the mildest cases, an autistic person just misses a social cue here and there, fails to attune to others here and there, but nothing that can break the natural flow of NT relating.

This is why I had to smile when the shrink said "that's not AS, that's a weak motivation to relate to people". Because he was actually defining AS by the latter. Only, he doesn't know enough about autism to realize that.


I agree. However there's a lot of externally self-centered NTs, if that makes any sense. They go through their entire lives manipulating people and acting to sell themselves. They might even be good altruistic people but their top concern is still about how they are perceived socially. These people are shallow and seem completely devoid of the ability to reflect on themselves or think deeply. I have a very strong gut-level aversion to these kinds of people. I seem to have a radar for them at a distance but I still can't avoid having to interact with them. I prefer interacting with internally self-centered individuals like myself over externally self-centered ones any day. I can't stand shallowness or fakeness.



fiddlerpianist
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Apr 2009
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,821
Location: The Autistic Hinterlands

28 May 2009, 3:51 pm

marshall wrote:
I agree. However there's a lot of externally self-centered NTs, if that makes any sense. They go through their entire lives manipulating people and acting to sell themselves. They might even be good altruistic people but their top concern is still about how they are perceived socially. These people are shallow and seem completely devoid of the ability to reflect on themselves or think deeply. I have a very strong gut-level aversion to these kinds of people. I seem to have a radar for them at a distance but I still can't avoid having to interact with them. I prefer interacting with internally self-centered individuals like myself over externally self-centered ones any day. I can't stand shallowness or fakeness.

Not surprisingly, many of the people I knew from high school that fit this description went into sales...

I wouldn't say that's a majority of NT folks are like this. It's just that the obnoxious ones are more memorable.


_________________
"That leap of logic should have broken his legs." - Janissy


Greentea
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Jun 2007
Age: 63
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,745
Location: Middle East

28 May 2009, 3:53 pm

That's the popular use of the term "self-centered", which is a totally different concept. As you say, these people are actually not self-centered at all; on the contrary, their focus is strongly on others, they depend on others to fulfill their needs and desires.


_________________
So-called white lies are like fake jewelry. Adorn yourself with them if you must, but expect to look cheap to a connoisseur.


marshall
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,752
Location: Turkey

28 May 2009, 4:18 pm

Greentea wrote:
That's the popular use of the term "self-centered", which is a totally different concept. As you say, these people are actually not self-centered at all; on the contrary, their focus is strongly on others, they depend on others to fulfill their needs and desires.

Maybe we need to invent some new language since there's obviously more than a single type of self-centeredness.

They're focused on others but I still consider it self-centered if everything is based on their own needs and desires. They're definitely no less self-centered than I am. I think there are genuinely caring NT's in the world who fit into an entirely different category, who aren't self-centered.



ToughDiamond
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Sep 2008
Age: 72
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,534

28 May 2009, 4:26 pm

I think a lot of people confuse the terms "self-centred" and "selfish"
You can have a self-centred person who is very unselfish.
And not all selfish people are self-centred. They can be very outgoing but it's all designed to get them their own way.



AmberEyes
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Sep 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,438
Location: The Lands where the Jumblies live

28 May 2009, 4:33 pm

Greentea wrote:
That's the popular use of the term "self-centered", which is a totally different concept. As you say, these people are actually not self-centered at all; on the contrary, their focus is strongly on others, they depend on others to fulfill their needs and desires.


For some people, they see focussing on other people and developing relationships with them as very important. They put a lot of energy into this. They live for others. They see people in the foreground of their lives. They may take on a lot of responsibilities in running group events. Their self development to them is synonymous with their social network development. This is why it's very important for them to keep up to date on who's friends with who. They define themselves by the social relationships they form with others. I've noticed that many of these people focussed people are women.

I have been called incredibly self aware as a compliment.
I've also been called incredibly self centered.

That's perhaps because I define myself by what I choose to do (the task) and what I like. I view people in the background of my life even though I've cared about many of them a lot. For some reason my mind focusses on the physical details of the environment first. It's a quirk.

While I've scored off of the scale on intra-personal (self awareness) intelligence tests, I've scored low on interpersonal (social) awareness tests.

Some social extroverts that I've met have found it very hard to engage in self introspection. It's as if they don't want to, or perhaps some of them don't quite know how? Perhaps energy that they're directing outward to socialising with others means that they have less energy to look into themselves. It's almost as if some of them are afraid of a "dark void" within themselves, a void that can't be defined with reference to other people.



marshall
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,752
Location: Turkey

28 May 2009, 4:34 pm

fiddlerpianist wrote:
marshall wrote:
I agree. However there's a lot of externally self-centered NTs, if that makes any sense. They go through their entire lives manipulating people and acting to sell themselves. They might even be good altruistic people but their top concern is still about how they are perceived socially. These people are shallow and seem completely devoid of the ability to reflect on themselves or think deeply. I have a very strong gut-level aversion to these kinds of people. I seem to have a radar for them at a distance but I still can't avoid having to interact with them. I prefer interacting with internally self-centered individuals like myself over externally self-centered ones any day. I can't stand shallowness or fakeness.

Not surprisingly, many of the people I knew from high school that fit this description went into sales...

I wouldn't say that's a majority of NT folks are like this. It's just that the obnoxious ones are more memorable.

I'm always amazed that obnoxious people are actually successful. If NT's really have better theory of mind than I do then why do they fall for flashy BS so easily?



marshall
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,752
Location: Turkey

28 May 2009, 5:33 pm

AmberEyes wrote:
Greentea wrote:
That's the popular use of the term "self-centered", which is a totally different concept. As you say, these people are actually not self-centered at all; on the contrary, their focus is strongly on others, they depend on others to fulfill their needs and desires.


For some people, they see focussing on other people and developing relationships with them as very important. They put a lot of energy into this. They live for others. They see people in the foreground of their lives. They may take on a lot of responsibilities in running group events. Their self development to them is synonymous with their social network development. This is why it's very important for them to keep up to date on who's friends with who. They define themselves by the social relationships they form with others. I've noticed that many of these people focussed people are women.

I have been called incredibly self aware as a compliment.
I've also been called incredibly self centered.

That's perhaps because I define myself by what I choose to do (the task) and what I like. I view people in the background of my life even though I've cared about many of them a lot. For some reason my mind focusses on the physical details of the environment first. It's a quirk.

While I've scored off of the scale on intra-personal (self awareness) intelligence tests, I've scored low on interpersonal (social) awareness tests.

Some social extroverts that I've met have found it very hard to engage in self introspection. It's as if they don't want to, or perhaps some of them don't quite know how? Perhaps energy that they're directing outward to socialising with others means that they have less energy to look into themselves. It's almost as if some of them are afraid of a "dark void" within themselves, a void that can't be defined with reference to other people.

Thank you. Everything you said applies to me. I also have the same feeling with extroverts.

I'm definitely not unaware of other people's emotions but I don't automatically go out of my way in terms of other people. I observe and analyze more than I engage. My interactions usually consist entirely of sharing views/experiences, discussion of some topic, or humor.

A major problem I have is that I don't reassure people or say things just to please them. I wish I could but it just doesn't feel like "me" when I do it. Some sort of internal embarrassment prevents it. I get into fights when people want reassurance from me that I can't give. My father hates it when I talk about my depression but I can't just hide my suffering no matter how much I don't wish for him to worry about me. I feel like my hands are completely tied and I start lashing out in anger. I don't know how NT's act in situations like this but I always go into melt-down mode and start verbally assaulting in a really ugly way.



ToughDiamond
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Sep 2008
Age: 72
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,534

29 May 2009, 9:49 am

marshall wrote:
I'm always amazed that obnoxious people are actually successful. If NT's really have better theory of mind than I do then why do they fall for flashy BS so easily?

That amazes me too.......you'd think that a bully would last about 5 minutes before word got round the community and they kicked the crap out of him till he promised to be good.

Ditto re flashy BS - either I'm severely paranoid, or I really can see right through the hype in a way that many people just don't seem able to. Adverts deceptively linking a product with some or other glittering reward (usually sex), megaphone-altruists and megaphone-heroes with their non-externally-verifiable tales of their own courage and virtue, those "NEW!" stickers on things that attract the sheep, politicians and priests pretending to be oh-so resolute and virtuous.......I just don't understand why any of these sociopaths are still with us :?