another_1 wrote:
Question for Willard (et al) . . .
I've noticed that, whenever the issue of self-diagnosis comes up, you make it clear (as you do in the post quoted below) that you hold the opinion that anyone who doesn't feel the need for a formal diagnosis must not have any real issues.
I do not claim to be able to make a formal diagnosis, but I can say with certainty that Asperger's is by far the best explanation I've found for the collection of issues I have. While I am investigating the ramifications a diagnosis would have, I expect that the state will take the position that, if I've managed to muddle through to the ripe old age of 49 without their assistance, there's no need for me to have it now.
Exactly. As a mater of fact since I'm fed up with the attitude after a post in another forum brought up Aspergers self diagnosis in a thread
completely unrelated to the topic I'm going to ask those who have a problem with my self diagnosis to put their money where their mouth is.
If you're so upset about my lack of an official diagnosis then I will get one
if you pay for it or arrange for me to get one without paying out of my own pocket. Lack of funds is after all one of the reasons I'm not seeking one. Another reason is that the prospect of discussing anything at all, let alone deeply personal matters, with a total stranger fills me with dread but if you hold up your end I'll suck it up and deal. Other than shutting up the people who are upset with my self diagnosis I don't think it'll do much good though, we barely have programs and resources to deal with severely effected children let alone 33 year old men who can pass if they try hard enough (no matter how much it costs them to do so).
Excellent post. This 40-something woman who tries hard enough to pass every day at great cost and didn't get an "official" diagnosis until needing the services of a psychologist for other reasons is in total agreement.