Not autistic under DSM 5!

Post Reply New Topic

The criteria by themselves, no, but if you read the full entry in the DSM-IV, it's clear that AS is presented as a form of autism in which speech is not strictly delayed.

For that matter, PDD-NOS mentions autism a handful of times in its very short text entry.

Conclusion of what the differences come down to:

- in detail, the autistic symptoms are coinciding, but children with the Asperger-type generally have a different level when it comes to developing personality and intellect/intelligence

I was diagnosed with high-functioning autism when I was 3-and-a-half, but my psychiatrist diagnosed me with Asperger's when I was 15. Yesterday I did the second half of my assessment to see how high-functioning I was. Since I was diagnosed with autism when I was little, I will always have that diagnosis. I like to think of myself as having Asperger's because it's more specific and it shows how high-functioning I am, but I'm more likely to qualify for social services if I'm registered with the provincial government as having autism. I feel sorry for anyone who lost their diagnosis with their new assessment and won't qualify for services. Most people don't seem to realize that high-functioning doesn't mean low needs. I am very high-functioning but still need a lot of help with school work and certain life skills.

I disagree that the genetics are the same. I think that there are probably a few common "autism genes," but I have a feeling that each subtype IS different genetically in some way. I just learned about alternative phenotype genetics in my bipolar textbook, and I really support this. I think that different phenotypes most likely have different genotypes overall, with some shared genetics to give major symptoms. This is why I'm such a proponent of studying AS vs. HFA. I want to see if these different phenotypes ARE genetically/neurologically different. While I agree that early intervention can change the phenotype of autism's severity, I think this is more due to the brain's natural plasticity more so than a dramatic change in gene function. Acquiring language seems to be much more a factor of plasticity than the product of different proteins being made or not.

Today I talked with my psychologist about the DSMV.
She does not like it, because it will exclude people from getting help who really need help.
I asked her, if I would get re-assessed and she said I fit the criteria for autism in the new DSMV and she would not even need to do an assessment again (she is a clinical psychologist specialized in autism and extra qualified to do assessments for any disorder).
I wonder when I read here, that the spectrum of Bipolar Disorder is getting broader and the one for ASD more "narrow", is it because with Bipolar Disorder pharmaceutical concerns can earn money with prescription drugs and enlarging the spectrum contributes to it and with autism, as there is no remedy, but people need actually support, the spectrum gets more narrow?
Or am I just being distrusting?

It's a joke that having carved out Aspergers from Autism they now want to forget it even existed - it says it all about what the DSM is really all about ie MONEY!

The next (fifth) edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), DSM-5, is currently in consultation, planning and preparation. It is due for publication in May 2013.[1] APA has a website about the development, including draft versions. APA.org is periodically listing several sections of DSM-V for review and discussion.[71] It includes several changes, including proposed deletion of the subtypes of schizophrenia.[72]

Former DSM psychiatrist Allen Frances has expressed concern regarding what he calls 'commercialism and heavy handed censorship' in the DSM-V process. He argues that psychiatric classification is too important to be left under the exclusive control of one professional organization.[73] Frances and others have published debates on what they see as the six most essential questions in psychiatric diagnosis - are they more like theoretical constructs or more like diseases; how to reach an agreed definition; whether the DSM-V should take a cautious or conservative approach; the role of practical rather than scientific considerations; the issue of use by clinicians or researchers; and whether an entirely different diagnostic system is required.[74]

In 2011, psychologist Brent Robbins co-authored a national letter for the Society for Humanistic Psychology that has brought thousands into the public debate about the DSM. Approximately 8,000 individuals and mental health professionals have signed a petition in support of the letter. Thirteen other American Psychological Association divisions have endorsed the petition.[75] In a recent article about the debate in the San Francisco Chronicle, Robbins notes that under the new guidelines, certain responses to grief could be labeled as pathological disorders, instead of being recognized as being normal human experiences.[76]

I am quite confused on this. I've heard bits and pieces, but I do not understand. Has someone already posted what the new criteria is?

There's also this:

http://www.dsm5.org/ProposedRevisions/P ... px?rid=489

As I understand it, those of us who don't fit all the new criteria for ASD, but have issues with pragmatic language, may now fall under "Social Communication Disorder" instead.

So what criteria separates language imapired ASD from SCD? they seem awfully close??

There's also this:

http://www.dsm5.org/ProposedRevisions/P ... px?rid=489

As I understand it, those of us who don't fit all the new criteria for ASD, but have issues with pragmatic language, may now fall under "Social Communication Disorder" instead.