Page 20 of 39 [ 615 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23 ... 39  Next

draelynn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Jan 2011
Age: 56
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,304
Location: SE Pennsylvania

26 May 2011, 8:26 pm

Verdandi wrote:
Oh, yes. I have a fairly good memory for conversations, details, etc. I remember most of what people tell me, although I don't have any special status for things they tell me about their social lives.

And a lot of people seem to not remember these things. It seems like some let go of the details and build up a gestalt idea based on past experiences without referring to the experiences so much. I hold onto details. This means I tend to remember people by specific incidents rather than an overall experience, so whether I have good or bad feelings might depend on what I recall. Not splitting - I mean I'm not "They're evil" or "they're on a pedestal." And I'm aware I do it so I try to resist it.


This might be why I have so much trouble with 'forgive and forget'. And maybe this is also why therapists and doctors do not understand that we are not preseverating on a past hurt. I can remember that past event in absolute clarity where the average NT glosses it over and somehow incorporates it into that gestalt idea of a person as a sum of the whole. A 'whole' person to me is the collection of each individual interaction with them. I'd don't have a generalized overall feeling as NT's seem to do.



kfisherx
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Nov 2010
Age: 61
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,192

26 May 2011, 8:41 pm

Wow, can't keep up with my own log some days. LOL!

HERE is where I am really, really in trouble. I check out of the conversation by default. Today when he stopped the conversation to tell me that perhaps I should ask a question about one of the places he traveled to I had to ask him what those places where again. Thinking back on it, I do that a LOT to him in our conversations. I just cannot track them because I sooooooo don't listen to what he is saying. Instead I am either on another planet or I am trying to comprehend all the pieces of the game. Most of the time the later as I am aware that I am paying to be there. I just cannot make my brain rewire and CARE about his small talk... :oops: I really am trying to be "good" in these sessions...



Verdandi
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Dec 2010
Age: 55
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,275
Location: University of California Sunnydale (fictional location - Real location Olympia, WA)

26 May 2011, 8:43 pm

draelynn wrote:
This might be why I have so much trouble with 'forgive and forget'. And maybe this is also why therapists and doctors do not understand that we are not preseverating on a past hurt. I can remember that past event in absolute clarity where the average NT glosses it over and somehow incorporates it into that gestalt idea of a person as a sum of the whole. A 'whole' person to me is the collection of each individual interaction with them. I'd don't have a generalized overall feeling as NT's seem to do.


I am absolutely terrible with forgive and forget.

I also used to have an issue with present context, so if someone was being nice to me right at that moment I may interact based on that rather than based on past (in school, usually bullying) experiences. This wasn't always the case, but often enough that it annoyed me in retrospect a lot of the time.



kfisherx
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Nov 2010
Age: 61
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,192

26 May 2011, 8:48 pm

Okay now here is where I might come off a bit weird even for you guys... I remember people by objects NOT specific incidents and especially not by conversations... That is not true of people in my "friend" circle. Those people I will remember great details RE our conversations. But this doctor is not in my friend circle and I remember him as WATER water flowing... Like a stream. He presented himself to me as that on our first visit. Almost every person I meet turns into an object (usually of nature) if I meet them again I will see this object over a person.... Strangers and random people like the kid in the grocery store are not even worthy of objects to me usually and rarely even come into my conscious thought or presence. IOW: I simply ignore them.



Verdandi
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Dec 2010
Age: 55
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,275
Location: University of California Sunnydale (fictional location - Real location Olympia, WA)

26 May 2011, 9:03 pm

kfisherx wrote:
Okay now here is where I might come off a bit weird even for you guys... I remember people by objects NOT specific incidents and especially not by conversations... That is not true of people in my "friend" circle. Those people I will remember great details RE our conversations. But this doctor is not in my friend circle and I remember him as WATER water flowing... Like a stream. He presented himself to me as that on our first visit. Almost every person I meet turns into an object (usually of nature) if I meet them again I will see this object over a person.... Strangers and random people like the kid in the grocery store are not even worthy of objects to me usually and rarely even come into my conscious thought or presence. IOW: I simply ignore them.


Not weird at all. Have you read about synesthesia?

To clarify, it's not weird because I am used to all kinds of stuff people have described here.

Also, seeing people as objects strikes me as kind of normal, even if I do not literally see them as objects. I associate their voices with objects, though, or rather textures. Like some voices sound like water over stone to me, and others sound like balloons. For example. That's so not the same thing as you mean, though.



kfisherx
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Nov 2010
Age: 61
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,192

26 May 2011, 9:10 pm

Verdandi wrote:
kfisherx wrote:
Okay now here is where I might come off a bit weird even for you guys... I remember people by objects NOT specific incidents and especially not by conversations... That is not true of people in my "friend" circle. Those people I will remember great details RE our conversations. But this doctor is not in my friend circle and I remember him as WATER water flowing... Like a stream. He presented himself to me as that on our first visit. Almost every person I meet turns into an object (usually of nature) if I meet them again I will see this object over a person.... Strangers and random people like the kid in the grocery store are not even worthy of objects to me usually and rarely even come into my conscious thought or presence. IOW: I simply ignore them.


Not weird at all. Have you read about synesthesia?

To clarify, it's not weird because I am used to all kinds of stuff people have described here.

Also, seeing people as objects strikes me as kind of normal, even if I do not literally see them as objects. I associate their voices with objects, though, or rather textures. Like some voices sound like water over stone to me, and others sound like balloons. For example. That's so not the same thing as you mean, though.


Synethesia is very different in that it turns objects into persons. I do it opposite. ?? That said I think what you do with sound is similar. In any case my relationship with people is very different than many models I am seeing...



Verdandi
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Dec 2010
Age: 55
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,275
Location: University of California Sunnydale (fictional location - Real location Olympia, WA)

26 May 2011, 9:34 pm

kfisherx wrote:
Synethesia is very different in that it turns objects into persons. I do it opposite. ?? That said I think what you do with sound is similar. In any case my relationship with people is very different than many models I am seeing...


Yes, it sounds like it.

Yours doesn't sound weird to me because, also, I have had people trying to convince me for years that face to face communication is more meaningful than text, and I had no idea how that could be. What you said makes a lot more sense than that ever did to me.



draelynn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Jan 2011
Age: 56
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,304
Location: SE Pennsylvania

26 May 2011, 9:37 pm

kfisherx wrote:
Wow, can't keep up with my own log some days. LOL!


you can't help it if you're interesting... ;)

Quote:
HERE is where I am really, really in trouble. I check out of the conversation by default. Today when he stopped the conversation to tell me that perhaps I should ask a question about one of the places he traveled to I had to ask him what those places where again. Thinking back on it, I do that a LOT to him in our conversations. I just cannot track them because I sooooooo don't listen to what he is saying. Instead I am either on another planet or I am trying to comprehend all the pieces of the game. Most of the time the later as I am aware that I am paying to be there. I just cannot make my brain rewire and CARE about his small talk... :oops: I really am trying to be "good" in these sessions...


Do you think you'd have an easier time paying attention if he was discussing something that you did like? Maybe if you can lay the ground work for the card game with a conversation you find easier to follow, you may be able to make easier progress. If you could focus on one new concept at a time it may also take some of that dread out of it. He could always introduce 'paying attention to crap you could care less about' after you have a soild grasp on the core concepts he wants you to learn. I have the attention span of a flea sometimes, so I know where you are with that. It just seems like you are struggling with many new concepts all at once.

I don't think he's trying to 'rewire' you (and if he is thats a whole other topic...). You have a goal in learning small talk. You want to interact more smoothly at work functions and the like. Approach the conversation like a scientist. If the small talk is part of the experiment, you would have to record it and analyse it. Maybe if you change your approach you can convince your brain that this information is personally useless but necessary to complete the experiment. Caring about what is actually said isn't even required. Approaching people from a sociology experiment POV is what worked for me... and lots of practice. He can't make you Nt.. But he can help you approximate it.

Quote:
Okay now here is where I might come off a bit weird even for you guys... I remember people by objects NOT specific incidents and especially not by conversations... That is not true of people in my "friend" circle. Those people I will remember great details RE our conversations. But this doctor is not in my friend circle and I remember him as WATER water flowing... Like a stream. He presented himself to me as that on our first visit. Almost every person I meet turns into an object (usually of nature) if I meet them again I will see this object over a person.... Strangers and random people like the kid in the grocery store are not even worthy of objects to me usually and rarely even come into my conscious thought or presence. IOW: I simply ignore them.


I don't find it weird. I sometimes associate people with abstracts - like a color/sound/smell/motion rorschak pattern. That's only people that are imprinted in my memory but not in my life recently - old friends, distant family, etc... It's a toss up if I'll recognise their faces. People who left no impression on me are a blank. I don't retain anything about them - not face or voice - most times even placing them where I met them does nothing. They are simply strangers all over again despite having pictures of myself with them. I have an aunt I haven't seen in 10 years. She's on the other side of the country and I have fond memories my time with her. But her face is very fuzzy to me. There is a good chance I wouldn't recognise her in an airport. But I could tell you exactly what her house looked like 35 years ago. She 'feels' like a soft warm fluffy blanket in soft muted earth tones and she 'smells' like dry musky/sweet flowers. This visualization thing is fairly common in AS. Not weird at all to me.



kfisherx
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Nov 2010
Age: 61
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,192

26 May 2011, 10:26 pm

EUREKA!! THAT'S it!! ! That is how to put Language to my "sensing" column in my relationship model. Whooo hoo. It is how people present themselves as objects. Okay.. Now Imma off to write those slides. This is going to be a fascinating NT versus AS presentation coming up. You guys all get free tickets. I will WILL CALL any WP member. :)

Okay so back on topic... He started the sessions off with topics in my special interest and I struggle actually harder with those because I cannot appropriately up-level the conversation or I tend to monologue. I think I do better on this non-interesting topics but I have a really hard time with checking out... Not sure what to do about that. I have been spending 47 years of my life in my "happy place" when amongst these earthlings... Not sure that is "fixable"

A couple of very interesting points (AKA things I have thought about since the session)

1. I feel like I am teetering right now on the edge of crashing. I see myself carrying plates and those plates falling. I think I have maxed out on what I can learn for awhile and I really need to be patient with all of this and let it absorb and grow... In other words it is time for great caution.

2. I am wondering if my inability to do small talk and ask about other people is part of the reason why I feel so disconnected from my parents. If that doctor had asked me to come up with people files for my Mother I do not think I could do it. 8O 8O 8O 8O

3. Finally on a funny (Looking back on it) but not so funny note. I asked the Dr, after his comment about me being rude a lot, if he would be so kind as to let me know when I made rude mistakes. He told me that he is using judgment about that and dealing with other things instead. My AS housemate and I just had a giggle about how bad someone has to be when being RUDE is not the first priority. 8O 8O 8O

Okay.... Those are my first things to work through this week.



kfisherx
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Nov 2010
Age: 61
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,192

02 Jun 2011, 9:54 am

T-4 hours.... I have been looking at the sheet of paper that the doctor handed me last week and just fuming over it. I am pissed off as hell about it. I cannot Language yet exactly why I am, but I am really mad. I have emailed him to ask that we do something else this week. I am afraid to go down this road with him right now. I might kill him or be rude again. 8O I realize that it is irrational. He is giving me exactly what I am paying him to give me. He is being respectful and doing a good job. And yet, I want to strangle him and his social rules. Irrational doesn't mean it isn't real. I need to figure out this anger before I can move forward.

I knew I was close to an edge last week. I just wasn't sure what that edge was. Still am not.

Should be an interesting session.

On another note (up one), I had a very lucid past two days. As lucid as any I have had since my Father's death. I was connecting to people on the streets and noticing them. One guy even smiled at me and he had beautiful blue eyes (I looked at his eyes) 8O . I haven't been able to see strangers on the street for 10 months. This ties to my social skills work to some degree and I was thinking about this on my evening walk with my schnauzer. I don't think you can "fake" this stuff. When I try to fake it, I fail. I have to somehow reach down and actually bring myself to "care" about the person to whom I am talking. Not "care" like a friend but somehow acknowledge them as people with feelings. Obviously I know they are all people with feelings but I cannot spare the energy to care about them... THAT is perhaps what I am mad about. Idk... much thinking to do.

I also had 2 hours to blow as my Volvo was getting waxed so walked into the mall area and was able to go into the electronic store without earplugs. It was annoying but I could actually handle being in there without a huge amount of tension. This is pretty good news to me. It means that I am not permanently stuck with my increased symptoms. At least that is what I hope it means.



kfisherx
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Nov 2010
Age: 61
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,192

02 Jun 2011, 9:38 pm

Whoa... Amazing cool session...

I stalled him earlier this week by telling him that I wanted to go over "functioning" levels in ASD. He had mentioned Winner's PDF (which I find pretty good actually) in my last week's meeting so I assigned him the task of putting me in one of her boxes. He actually came prepared to do that.

http://www.socialthinking.com/images/st ... .26.10.pdf

Interesting thing is that he put me squarely in the ESC category which is the same "box" that Michelle (author) puts Temple Grandin. 8O Okay so that is sort of freaky. But overall not suprising as I had put myself in that category as well when I first discovered this eons ago. The only problem I have with it is that the prognosis for this group category is so poor. (Guarded living...) He told me that Michelle calls Temple and outlier and he would class me in the same way.. Huh... Go figure. It is starting to make sense to me now why everyone keeps telling me that I remind them of her. I think she is WAAAAAAY more affected than me and she certainly was as a child. I spoke rather early and did not have issues with meltdowns. I did shutdown but nobody cared about that. In any case, I was not recommend to be institutionalized like she.

It was sort of cool to go over the ESC Profile and look at all his notes as to things he noticed. He also was able to explain some of the things to me such as "narrative talk" and how NTs do that somewhat naturally whereas I do not do it at all. LOL!

He did get me to talk about my anger over his paper and I think I made a really cool breakthrough but am not yet ready to talk about it. I think this is really, really big but until I figure out how to re-arrange the thoughts (find the words) I cannot properly explain it. When I left, he did understand from where my anger came and I was exhausted from holding back a meltdown and from finding the words.

All in all a good session even though I stalled the whole social skills thing for awhile. I have a hill to climb before I can get back to it.



Verdandi
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Dec 2010
Age: 55
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,275
Location: University of California Sunnydale (fictional location - Real location Olympia, WA)

02 Jun 2011, 9:42 pm

What does "narrative talk" mean in this context?

Not to pick that out - I'll have a more substantial reply later.



kfisherx
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Nov 2010
Age: 61
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,192

02 Jun 2011, 11:03 pm

Verdandi wrote:
What does "narrative talk" mean in this context?

Not to pick that out - I'll have a more substantial reply later.


No, it's fine. The other subject we have beat to death (perhaps even in this thread) : D:D

Narrative talk is when you have the ability to make stories up in the context of small talk. These mini-stories would have a beginning, some sort of middle, and an ending. His example was

"I had lunch at bunks yesterday. I got a pulled pork sandwich and it was amazing. The place was ridiculously crowded though"

Each sentence in that small talk mini-story has a function (beginning, middle and end).

He says I cannot do this. I asked him if NTs do this naturally and he said they do not but it is quickly learned skill.

He also suggested that I have a hard time reading fiction (I do) and only read Technical books for that reason.



meeemoi
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 24 May 2011
Age: 48
Gender: Male
Posts: 131

02 Jun 2011, 11:16 pm

kfisherx wrote:
So today was my first social skills session with the new pyschologist and the topic was small-talk. We had done an "intake" interview last week and decided that this was the right place to start for me. I want to just stop right here and say that I have seen 3 pyschologists now in the Portland area and ALL of them have no doubt I am on the spectrum and not a one was rude to me. I keep worrying that I am going to run into one of the many "quacks" that I keep reading about here but so far I am not seeing it at all. Also not seeing how DX is that complicated. Apparently all I have to do is be in the same room with a shrink and they label me. LOL!

Anyway...

He started the session by printing out the 3 areas of focus that I articulated I needed to work on and asked me to confirm them. Then he reminded me that I am already very sucessful in this world and the work we were doing was like icing on the cake sort of thing in the grand scheme. He stressed that the stuff I was to learn did not HAVE to be used but rather I COULD use it if I needed it in some social situations especially with respect to my work. I did not understand why this was important at the beginning of the session but by the end I knew why.

This guy is easier for me to talk to than my first one because he deals with Asperger people all the time and as such he knows how to keep the conversation a little more "real" for me. I liked my first one but he talked in a lot of very abstract (for me) concepts and we had to continually adjust our conversations which was always challenging for both of us. That said, he got me through my grief issues just fine so not complaining.

This new guy is really astute RE ASD from what I can tell and when he sees me struggling with a phrase (like I got stuck on "chip off the old block" and then again when he refered to people on the beach being "buff") he asks me to describe to him the process I am using to understand him. He specficially wanted to know if I thought in pictures (I did not know at first) and asked me to describe the pictures I saw if I did. This actually taught me that I do think more in pictures than I thought I did and also that I seek and process "nouns" in conversation. When he said "chip off the old block" for instance, I did not process that as a phrase and instead saw, pocker chips, potato chips, tortillia chips, cow chip and chocolate chip before it registered that chip and block were together. What was most fascinating to me is that it really did not take all that long (I only hesitated for a moment on the phrase) and most people would not have caught it at all but he had me stop and talk my personal process through for him in order to understand how I worked. This information was useful to him later when he was helping me to find words as he asked me to describe something in my picture.

After our initial conversation and my commitment to learning about small talk and doing his "activity" he launched into a bit of small talk conversation using himself as person 1, 2 and 3. Person 1 said something about having great BBQ at a place somewhere (I can't remember where). Person 2 then said something and person 3 said something else. As he was talking, he reached into his desk and pulled out these red, green and yellow cards. He then asked me if I understood the relevance of person number 1's statement to person number 2's statement. At that point I realized that I had to admit that I "zoned out" pretty much right away on that conversation. I was a tiny bit apologetic as I explained that I zoned out as soon as I heared the topic. He confirmed that I zoned out because it wasn't interesting to me or one of my interests. I nodded then and smiled thinking how smart he was to just get it like that. He patiently stressed the need to pay attention and started again.

Now I felt like a 5 year old and I leaned forward to listen...

He explained again how small talk is about conversation that is very high level and can go in a lot of seemingly random places and how the objective of the game was to pick up on what the first person said and to make a statement that tied to it somehow. He repeated the conversation between persons 1, 2 and 3. This time I listened (though I had to fight it). We spent the next 10 minutes discussing how person 1's statement and 2's statement tied. They both talked about BBQ food but person 2 brought the conversation to New Oreleans. He went into some depth RE that and I zoned again for awhile. The 3rd person made some comment RE trip to Hawaii. I missed the "connection" completely there and told him that was a completely random statement to me. He explained that N.O. and Hawaii are two vacation spotsso the third person was able to use vacation spots and make a 2-3 sentence statement that was acceptable. I had some trouble figuring the leap from BBQ to vacation but did not argue. At that point he finished stating that the conversation will often appear random but that is how small talk works. The rules of the game were that you take what 1 person says and you make a statement that you can tie to it somehow and you make that statement just 2-3 sentences. I was starting to feel pretty overwhelmed by this time.

Next thing we did was he handed me 4 red cards (called "chime in" cards) and we played a game of small talk. He made a statement and laid down a card, and my job was to reply to that statment applying the "small talk" rules and I got to lay down a card. The card thing assured that we did a round of 8 exchanges and also made it a very visual thing for me. Net is that this game brought me to tears. I really did not expect to SUCK this badly and it really drove home just how freak'n different (AKA weird) I really was. I struggled through 1.5 rounds of this with him helping me to give appropriate levels of conversation and prompting me many different times. In one of our scenarios we were discussing nutrition (one of my topics of interest) and he ask me to image that he was overweight. Then he made a statement that he did not really care too much about what he ate. I refused to comment at all in that conversation because there was nothing I could say to him that would not be offensive. So he helped me to figure out what to say. I said something very random but immediately wanted to pull it back as it felt so irresponisbile to say that as there was so much more information that needed to go with the phrase. He again reminded me that small talk was not to be "deep" level. I was clearly uncomfortable and very overwhelmed.

We pretty much ended it there. He did introduce me to the green cards which are "question" cards but we did not go into any games yet with that. He did say that the green cards had the 5 big question (who, what, where, when, how) and that the rules with them is that you have to fake/pretend interest if you laid one of those down. He mentioned that I would have to look at the person. I saw yellow cards and orange ones too. I am very worried how complicated this is all going to get. I was also very freaked out because I figured that I would more-or-less get this pretty quickly and right away.

He told me that he has seen worse and he thinks I will improve very quickly. I felt like I had just run a marathon when it was over and hardly had the energy to get out of the seat to leave. I never expected the session to be that hard....

Dayum....


I'm not sure how this game is played but it seems intresting. Seems like he uses tools specifically for your issues and that it is really well thought out to engage the brian in a certain way



Verdandi
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Dec 2010
Age: 55
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,275
Location: University of California Sunnydale (fictional location - Real location Olympia, WA)

02 Jun 2011, 11:28 pm

That's interesting. I'm trying to think about whether I do that, and I don't think so:

I tend to find that I go into a lot of detail when I tell people things, and then they just kind of go "...okay" and change the subject or try to vague things up a lot. I can't imagine sharing information like that unless it was directly relevant to something like discussing where to have lunch. I know other people do this, and I just want them to stop telling me random things so we can talk about something interesting and relevant.



draelynn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Jan 2011
Age: 56
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,304
Location: SE Pennsylvania

03 Jun 2011, 12:21 am

I keep finding myself pulled back to one question... is THIS left brain/'male' brained AS? I'm very interested in the differnces in the hemispheres of the brain - thanks my lefthandedness. I have always described myself as so left handed I should be disabled. Funny, in a not so funny way, that I was probably right.

I understand narrative talk. I wouldn't be able to write fiction if I didn't. Many times I get lost in the details but I know a 'story' needs to go from A to B to C. I can do it well in print. I take the long way around in conversation though. It's also embarrassing when you lose sight of your point half way through your narrative too. Verbal conversation needs the equivilent of spell check...

In general, I am so not left brained, and therefore not the 'stereotypical' Aspie that I'm not even sure I could find someone to understand my difficulties. I read the article you linked and I place myself firmly as a WISC. It was kind of chilling to read that description actually. And kind of depressing. It actually confirmed my worse fear - I probably can't be diagnosed.

I'm kind of chuckling at the Temple Grandin comparison. Come on now... you know every Aspie/ASD is different! And, of course, he could be off by a matter of degrees. I know Temple has this magic aura around her in the professional community. Even they are subject to a bit of starstruck-ness. After many many years of working around and with people, Temple is at the level that you are now entering the same social arena at. I'm not sure that puts you 'on the same level' by any means.

And since Verdandi brought up 'discussing something relevent...'; I used to abhor gossip in highschool... and college. It was pointless (and still is really). I developed a taste for it during my time at small local community paper - the owner and main writer was, understandably so, a gossip hound. She would go on for hours as we sat together cursing out her ultra slow Adobe pagemaker as we laid out the paper. I could have cared less about the people and events and places she was blathering about BUT I was fascinated by why SHE was so interested in it. I found myself asking her to dish on the drivel just so I could pull apart her completely engrossed, all encompassing fascination with - nothing. It stuck. I still ask people what they've heard or prompt them for gossipy details just to see WHICH details stick with whom. It really does give you some good insight into their psyche.

I really should have dual majored in college - psychiatry/sociology.

Anyway - that is vaguely relevent because following someone elses conversation - when you look at it from the clinical perspective it makes things like 'narrative talk' much clearer. I know finding that way to CARE enough to bother following a conversation is a challenge in and of itself - but I think once you find the right motivation, it will all kind of click into place. You have been having quite a few ah-ha moments in the past few weeks. Your progress seems fairly quick to me! So - very curious about the new breakthrough!

Oh - and reading materials of choice - if work acquaintences re-gift you with a textbook on 'The Plants of Pennsylvania' (yes - all of them) because they know 'you'd enjoy it more than they would' does that mean you might be an Aspie? I was ecstatic - it is awesome - and it came from someone who was a very very passing in the hallway kind of acquaintance.