Xeno wrote:
The word can be insensitive depending on how its used, but it doesn't really bother me when used with a grain of salt. After all, I'm sure all of us use some words like "idiot", "moron", or "imbecile"... but look up the original meanings of those words. I'm not a fan of insensitivity at all, but I also don't think people should walk on eggshells to be politically correct.
The original meaning of those words was variations on "mentally ret*d", yes. Those words became acceptable stand-ins for "jerk who doesn't pay attention or makes bad decisions" only
after they were retired by the medical community.
The problem with using "ret*d" as an insult to mean "clueless jerk" is that it hasn't yet been retired by the medical community. Once the medical community abandons "ret*d" entirely and all the people who have it on their medical records have died of old age, it will become an acceptable alternative to "idiot". But as long as it is on
any living person's medical record, it should not be used as an insult.
This is where Callista steps in and says that the core problem is not the vocabulary per se, but rather seeing intellectual disabilties as a debased and horrible condition. And until we stop doing that, a merry-go-round of retiring one word after another as each one morphs into an insult is just avoiding confronting the core problem.
And she's right.
(Callista- you made that point many months ago the last time I made almost the exact same post. These "why can't I say 'ret*d'?" posts are almost as common as "am I an Aspie?" posts.)