An interview with a highly succesful Aspergers Adult
The thing is that I am being asked to do interviews and provide insight for others and I feel like I am an exception (as you guys so rightly point out) and as such am NOT the best voice for ASD issues overall. But, of course, since I hit success despite my ASD, I am being asked to articulate what it is that makes me different. I think there is benefit to this so have agreed but I cannot articulate this without understanding the other side and trying to compare from that starting point. The "giftedness" label makes it all just that much harder to understand.. My pyschologist keeps saying to me, "You are really, really (or super) smart" when I ask him why I have managed to avoid under-employment. He stresses to me that my ASD issues are masking my true potential and that I might be in even a better place without them. It is fascinatingto hear these other perspectives.
I have been pondering those questions lately myself. I earn a good living as an electrical engineer. Now my son, who is only seven right now, is also diagnosed with AS. So I am trying to figure out what I did so I can lead him down the same path. I do have a giftedness when it comes to math, numbers, patterns, etc.. (not at a savant level by any means though) However, giftedness by itself can't be the answer, as many have already attested too.
Someone earlier mentioned that possibly it is the comorbids that are preventing people. I have come to the conclusion for me personally, it is because of the comorbids. I have pretty severe anxiety and OCD issues. However, I have been able to control them. Control not meaning to do away with. Control meaning to refocus them. I can't get rid of them. I've tried. but I can refocus them. For instance I was a heavy drinker for decades. When i decided it was time to stop, I put my OCD to work on my liver. Now I physically can't get drunk, I'd have an anxiety attack first. I first logically come up with what my instrusive thoughts are going to be. The intrusive thoughts have to be set up just right becuase they are going to drive certain compulsive behaviors and it's these behaviors I am looking for. I come up with my planned intrusive thoughts and then hand them over to my OCD. My OCD will latch onto them like a pitbull.
At work I am known to be very detail orientated in my engineering designs. Its due to the same backwards working of OCD. I wanted my complusive behavior to be something that leads to perfect 100% commitment to detail. So I come up with intrusive thougths that will lead me to that compulsive behavior. Then I give them over to my OCD. I have a whole set of compulsions I use at work to be the best at what I do.
I'm not sure your going to find a single answer on this. Everyone is different. I consider myself mild AS, but more severe anxiety/OCD. You don't strike me as an anxious person so what I am saying is probably useless.
I think the biggest danger of not telling a kid they're autistic is they'll think up some other reason they're different. Mine was that I wasn't human. That did a lot of damage. Plus I was having serious problems functioning and I blamed myself which was even more terrible than suspecting I wasn't human. I honestly believed I didn't want things enough because I couldn't do them.
The biggest danger of a kid knowing isn't that they'll use it as an excuse. (They might, but that's easier to deal with than a lot of things, and frankly a lot of people think someone is using it as an excuse even when they're not just because they're not meeting expectations. I also remember this great line from John Hockemberry, a journalist who's paraplegic. His dad said "I think you're using your paralysis as a crutch." He replied, "If I could use crutches I wouldn't be in this wheelchair!") It's that the kid will internalize a medical/pathological view of themselves, and come to completely loathe themselves as "defective". This can also cause them to fail at things, not because they use it as an excuse but because they honestly believe they can't.
Of course they could pathologize themselves even if they didn't know, and the conditions they suspect can be worse than the truth.
_________________
"In my world it's a place of patterns and feel. In my world it's a haven for what is real. It's my world, nobody can steal it, but people like me, we live in the shadows." -Donna Williams
The thing is that I am being asked to do interviews and provide insight for others and I feel like I am an exception (as you guys so rightly point out) and as such am NOT the best voice for ASD issues overall. But, of course, since I hit success despite my ASD, I am being asked to articulate what it is that makes me different. I think there is benefit to this so have agreed but I cannot articulate this without understanding the other side and trying to compare from that starting point. The "giftedness" label makes it all just that much harder to understand.. My pyschologist keeps saying to me, "You are really, really (or super) smart" when I ask him why I have managed to avoid under-employment. He stresses to me that my ASD issues are masking my true potential and that I might be in even a better place without them. It is fascinatingto hear these other perspectives.
I have some slight degree of giftedness (I graduated from an Ivy League university and also went to a good art school, so I have some artistic talent), and my AS is fairly mild, but even so I have found that even the small, subtle difficulties brought on by AS have been a large hurdle that I have been unable to overcome. I have always had the feeling that somehow other people have a handle on how to live and on how things are done, and that I have been left in the dark. I have had to use my intelligence to figure out these things from scratch, but I haven't done a good enough job of it. I am always perplexed and out of place, always misspeaking or misunderstanding. To me it's these small subtleties that are the hardest to overcome. Perhaps if I had some great talent in a marketable area they would not matter, but since I don't, I feel stuck. Ihave seen more than 14 therapists in the last 20 years but none have been of any help. Perhaps this is what you mean by the "other side" of the issue?
I also have Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, and that is the primary reason I don't have a job or career, but without the AS I think I could still have been a practicing artist, for instance, but it just all seems too difficult and out of reach somehow. It's almost mysterious as to why.
I am the mother of a 5 yr old with an ASD. He was diagnosed at the age of 2.5 and we knew something was going on from about 1 yr of age.
You mentioned that your mom said you were an odd child. Do you recall anything about your childhood that would have indicated AS as a child? I am wondering about whether it is beneficial to tell a child about their diagnosis at a young age. Many parents feel that the child should be told right away, but I am wondering if the child will start to use it as a crutch or an excuse to get away with certain things.
Anything you can share is appreciated.
My Mother told me that I talked very early and sometimes I talked a lot. She said I pushed people away and did not wish contact with people in general. I played with my 2 year older brother and his friends (did not have my own friends until pretty late in life) and when he went off to school, I spent the entire day swinging or spinning on the swing down in the basement never uttering a word. (Hours just lost in my own world) She said I was fercely independent and wandered off all the time even when I was very young. A few times they had to call the police to help locate me. She said that when they found me (even if it was hours that I was missing) I never gave any indication that I knew I was lost. I was just in my own world.
Besides, those things I can remember a few other signs...
I lined up my horse collection (never playing with them like horses) and when we played with match box cars, I lined them up too. I remember making parking lots with the cars and putting cars in categories (color or model) while my brother and his friends actually played with theirs like cars.
I used to watch spiders and ants for hours and hours
I loved animals much more than people
My special interests were horses and trains
Horrible at most sports (slowest runner and last picked for sports teams at school)
would not wear anything scratchy
Preferred boys clothing to girls clothing and was always Tom boy
I puked so much that my nick name was kutzy
Banged my head or kicked to go to sleep
Rubbed my blanky all the time between my fingers to go to sleep and sucked my thumb until I was 10
Twisted my hair all the time when I was awake or twisted anything in my hands
Tops were some of my favorite toys. I had the kind you launched with strings even
Several times I wandered away from my Mother and Father in stores and ultimately hooked up with a different family. I remember once my folks came by and I was holding another man's hand thinking that he was my Father. (I was at least 4 years old by that time.) My parents laughed at me, and collected me from them. I was embarassed so I tried to be more careful about who I hooked up with after that.
My psychologist is absolutely floored at how I escaped any sort of diagnosis or intervention even though Aspergers wasn't even around back then. He just shakes his head when I unviel one of these from my youth. My folks never suspected anything medical. That said, my Mother did always say that I was from Mars. So I grew up knowing that I was different and just assumed I was from Mars. I was loved like the other kids but just wasn't one of them. For some reason that never really bothered me too much.
Funny thing is that my own child (my youngest who is now 26) wandered off if I did not watch her closely, walked around in a daze (her own world) much of the time, did not speak until she was almost 3 years of age (the Dr said it was because her sister talked for her), rocked and banged her head to fall asleep every night while humming, was picked on horribly in school and had horrible motor skills. She never was diagnosed either as Aspergers did not exist until she was graduated from High School and off in college. By that time she was fine. She is obtaining her PhD from UCLA right now.
Last edited by kfisherx on 26 Jan 2011, 10:02 am, edited 1 time in total.
Hmm interesting topic.
I suspect that it depends on one's definitions... for example I would define giftedness as expressed talent. Other people define talent as an expressed gift. Other people maintain that giftedness is inherent and talent is developed.
Whichever way around it goes, being gifted/talented perhaps means that:
1. the person is capable of effective expression, which is understood by other people.
2. the expression of talent tends to be socially recognised in the form of employment or accomplishments. That is, as long as the talent is socially acceptable!
These two aspects of giftedness are intrapersonal and interpersonal, and may result in improved function of a person with AS.
I think that there are a number of factors that can lead to "non-accomplishment" (for want of a better term).
Some of these factors could be classified as mental health issues: depression, OCD, anxiety, etc.
Other factors could be classified as behavioural issues: ADD/ADHD etc.
However, as other posters have written, these apparently negative factors can be focussed and integrated into the success of the individual.
For each person, the key to success is to find a niche. Like an ecosystem, society has many niches that are occupied by organisms with specific features and specific requirements.
Perhaps the advantage in being AS, and gifted (and being relatively free of co-morbid conditions), is that the individual is more likely to find a suitable niche, and thrive in it.
Personally, I find being gifted means that:
1. my mental processing is rapid and this alleviates some of the social and executive aspects of AS. Basically I can keep up with the play, even though it involves deliberate cognition. For example, I still rely on literal language, but I can analyse the multiple possible meanings of the language quickly.
2. I have a socially acceptable reason for some of my behaviour. People can understand that "brainy" people act differently, whereas they may not understand HFA/AS.
3. my interests are broader and I am capable of paradigm transfer: I like geometry, mechanics, music, math, braidwork, playing soccer. To me, all these fields involve a logical paradigm of pattern recognition. The ability to paradigm transfer frees me from having a "fixed interest" which is apparently a characteristic of ASD. I have more of a "fixed" mindset or style of processing, which has more applications than a fixed interest does.
These three results of giftedness obviously have social and intrapersonal benefits. Of course, there are other sides to being gifted, not all glorious.
I think that the intersection of ASD and giftedness is very interesting. The writing of Michael Piechowksi et al is gaining momentum in the gifted learning community. It is based on the ideas of Dabrowski, concerning "overexcitability". Many of the sensory and processing aspects of overexcitability are relevant to the ASD/gifted field.
The thing is that I am being asked to do interviews and provide insight for others and I feel like I am an exception (as you guys so rightly point out) and as such am NOT the best voice for ASD issues overall. But, of course, since I hit success despite my ASD, I am being asked to articulate what it is that makes me different. I think there is benefit to this so have agreed but I cannot articulate this without understanding the other side and trying to compare from that starting point. The "giftedness" label makes it all just that much harder to understand.. My pyschologist keeps saying to me, "You are really, really (or super) smart" when I ask him why I have managed to avoid under-employment. He stresses to me that my ASD issues are masking my true potential and that I might be in even a better place without them. It is fascinatingto hear these other perspectives.
I have been pondering those questions lately myself. I earn a good living as an electrical engineer. Now my son, who is only seven right now, is also diagnosed with AS. So I am trying to figure out what I did so I can lead him down the same path. I do have a giftedness when it comes to math, numbers, patterns, etc.. (not at a savant level by any means though) However, giftedness by itself can't be the answer, as many have already attested too.
Thank you for your insight to this question. With respect to your child... I raised an Aspie kid and did not tell her (because I did not know). If I had to do it over again I would tell her at an early age and start her with social awareness training at an early age. I would do everything I could to prevent the bullying thing. My kid is 100% okay now and working on her PhD but she had a pretty tough go of it in elementary school. It would have been far easier with intervention and some training I think.
Hi Anbuend-
While I totally agree 100% with what you said in relation to telling a child about the ASD, I can also see a flip side to knowing about the diagnosis at such a young age. I guess this is more about me than my son. I guess since he was diagnosed at 2.5, and he did not walk until 2, he has had slow developing motor skills, I have always felt so overprotective of him. He is 5.5 now, and he is getting stronger and moves around pretty well now. He really does not show any interest in sports, so I don't push him. I am just afraid he is not as strong as the other kids.
Also, he has been in special education since he was 3 yrs old. And while I believe the therapy he has received has been beneficial, I just worry that I am keeping him in this protective bubble. I want to let go and let him have more independence, but since he doesn't seem interested in things, I don't really push him very hard. I just fear that since I have known about his diagnosis since he was 2.5, am I sheltering him too much? Where do you find the balance?
That can be a seriously tough call because it's a balance that depends a lot on each child and their situation.
I think possibly the most important skill an autistic person (or possibly any person) can learn in life is resilience. And that is hard to learn if you're too sheltered to experience difficult situations, but also hard to learn if you're being left to fend for yourself to the point where it could break you rather than teach you to deal with problems. Being too sheltered from life can come to feel like a prison. And yet not everyone is capable of dealing with things without unusual kinds of help.
I know horror stories of autistic people from both extremes. A girl always overprotected by her family who grew into a woman who saw no wrong in trying to kill people over minor disagreements, because no matter what she did wrong growing up her parents treated it as a sensory issue or similar rather than a moral issue. Nobody ever told her she was wrong. Nobody ever let her fail at anything either. She became a spoiled bully of an extremely scary sort. (And by try to kill people I mean well-planned sneaky attempts, not impulsive violence.) On the other side are many people who were left to the sink or swim approach, and sank. Homelessness, prostitution, starvation, etc.
Obviously those are the two extremes, and they're people who weren't suited for either approach. I bet there are exceptionally ethical people who could have been spoiled but weren't. And there are lots of people who rise to the occasion and swim rather than sink. I've experienced both overprotection and outright neglect, and although I have terrible self-care skills and need assistance with everything, I usually prefer neglect to a gilded cage. Fortunately I live in a location where I can get services that don't require entrance into a cage to benefit from them.
I think the trick, which is terribly hard in practice, is to provide someone support if they need it (which does include if they can do something but it takes everything they have, there needs to be help there) but not to shelter them from the consequences of their actions either, and to provide them with whatever skills they can sustain, to do things on their own. But I don't need to tell you parenting is the hardest job on earth, you know that better than I do (I can't have children for medical reasons among others). It still awes me that as many parents do as well as they do. It's easier to pick it apart from the outside than it is to live it. The problem is there's no easy formula for any of this. I've given the extreme examples but in real life it's like a constant balancing act where the object you're balancing on keeps moving.
I hope any of that was helpful and not just me yammering at myself.
_________________
"In my world it's a place of patterns and feel. In my world it's a haven for what is real. It's my world, nobody can steal it, but people like me, we live in the shadows." -Donna Williams
Again, definitely not undermining your achievements, but your story is more of an inspiration for Aspies who are mature enough to confront their limitations, rather than most Autistic people who can barely make sense of the world, never mind function successfully in it.
When I found myself at 19 years old with a baby and subsequently single with two babies, I had no choice but to grow up or give up. I describe in painful detail how much pain and suffering it was for me to do that. I did it for my kids.
Funny you should say that. I've also considered that there's broadly two types of Autistic people.
Autism principally impedes people in two ways: immaturity and social skills (I'm using the word immaturity in its most familiar sense, i.e. the ability to function as successfully as one would be expected to given one's biological age, rather than your psychologists's definition). The two Types are determined by whether an individual is most impeded by poor social skills or immaturity:
The first type of Autistic person is relatively mature and independent for his/her age, but is very introverted and has very poor social skills. These individuals - regardless of gender - also have a masculine temperament. Men who fit into this category are typically classic computer nerds with good jobs in IT, but are very unsuccesful with women, and have few friends (except perhaps a few other nerds). Women who fit into this category tend to be tomboyish (possibly gay), are unsuccessful with men (if they're straight), but often have a fairly successful career in a male dominated profession. Temple Grandin (and you maybe?) fall into this category.
The second type of Autistic person is somewhat extroverted and creative, and doesn't struggle with the social awkwardness that plights Type 1. However, he/she is extremely immature for their age, and struggles in any aspect of life that necessitates maturity - careers, independence, etc. These individuals - regardless of gender - have more of a feminine temperament. Women who fit into this category are almost always straight, and are often saved by a 'knight in shining armour', i.e. a NT man. However, men who fit into this category are often confused about their sexuality (though they're usually more metrosexual than gay), and struggle enormously in their lives (as men aren't allowed to be 'damsels in distress') until, at some point, they finally stop being Peter Pan and grow up. I would definitely put myself in this category (I'm not gay or effeminate, but I'm not macho either - certainly not compared to American men!).
I still haven't figured out how I didn't end up going down this road. All it would have taken is a little turn to the left or right at certain points in my life.
Please. Don't stop "yammering".
_________________
When God made me He didn't use a mold. I'm FREEHAND baby!
The road to my hell is paved with your good intentions.
Verdandi
Veteran

Joined: 7 Dec 2010
Age: 55
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,275
Location: University of California Sunnydale (fictional location - Real location Olympia, WA)
I still haven't figured out how I didn't end up going down this road. All it would have taken is a little turn to the left or right at certain points in my life.
What kind of support network did you have? That's one element that seems to get elided in conversations like this.
Quoted for truth.
I still haven't figured out how I didn't end up going down this road. All it would have taken is a little turn to the left or right at certain points in my life.
What kind of support network did you have? That's one element that seems to get elided in conversations like this.
My life took some very strange turns. I've been briefly homeless. I brushed up against hard drugs. Strangely, the people I was hanging with wouldn't let me do anything stronger than pot or hash because I was already "too weird". Somehow they knew me better than I knew myself.
At one such turning point, I was invited to San Francisco by a rich gay man (he was looking for a house boy I think). This was just before AIDS started edging into awareness and the bath houses were in full swing. Had I taken his "free ticket" I'm certain my utter lack of social skills would have sucked me straight into the dark regions of that lifestyle.
(as an aside, even though I am straight, I was routinely hit on by gay men. There was something about my demeanor that they found attractive)
Another such turn was when I decided to pull up roots and leave my home town. Didn't have a clue where to go or what for. I had no money, just my old motor cycle. I was on my own at the time, no employment prospects. I just up and left. I ended up hooked up with a church group and traveled with them. It kept me out of drugs and such. I was a real weirdo, but they were quite tolerant. Not at all the rigid "your problems are all satanic influences" type of Christians.
It seems like I always fell into situations that kept me from a total collapse. Just enough to keep me moving forward. Never enough to do anything more than make it through to the next crisis.
One interesting aspect was that I had developed an extremely strong sense of right and wrong, a very aspie sort of ethics. It seemed to keep me from doing things that would have otherwise been very destructive. It also led to some very baffling times because everybody else was so 'unethical'.
It's all very strange how it's turned out. Especially the feeling that after a life of existential wandering, how bumping up against autism feels like I've finally made it home.
_________________
When God made me He didn't use a mold. I'm FREEHAND baby!
The road to my hell is paved with your good intentions.
Thanks Anbuend----very well stated. It is a balancing act indeed. It is definitely something to consider as I go forward raising my son. At home, my husband and I do try our best to teach our son that he cannot rule the house and that there are consequences to his actions. But, he is just so lost interacting with children, I am afraid to just let him loose and let him sink or swim as you put it. I guess he is still very young (5.5) so as he gets older, I will try my best to keep all of this in perspective.
Thanks for taking the time to respond. You definitely helped me see the big picture.
Autism principally impedes people in two ways: immaturity and social skills (I'm using the word immaturity in its most familiar sense, i.e. the ability to function as successfully as one would be expected to given one's biological age, rather than your psychologists's definition). The two Types are determined by whether an individual is most impeded by poor social skills or immaturity:
The first type of Autistic person is relatively mature and independent for his/her age, but is very introverted and has very poor social skills. These individuals - regardless of gender - also have a masculine temperament. Men who fit into this category are typically classic computer nerds with good jobs in IT, but are very unsuccesful with women, and have few friends (except perhaps a few other nerds). Women who fit into this category tend to be tomboyish (possibly gay), are unsuccessful with men (if they're straight), but often have a fairly successful career in a male dominated profession. Temple Grandin (and you maybe?) fall into this category.
The second type of Autistic person is somewhat extroverted and creative, and doesn't struggle with the social awkwardness that plights Type 1. However, he/she is extremely immature for their age, and struggles in any aspect of life that necessitates maturity - careers, independence, etc. These individuals - regardless of gender - have more of a feminine temperament. Women who fit into this category are almost always straight, and are often saved by a 'knight in shining armour', i.e. a NT man. However, men who fit into this category are often confused about their sexuality (though they're usually more metrosexual than gay), and struggle enormously in their lives (as men aren't allowed to be 'damsels in distress') until, at some point, they finally stop being Peter Pan and grow up. I would definitely put myself in this category (I'm not gay or effeminate, but I'm not macho either - certainly not compared to American men!).
I'm not generally interested in splitting autistic people into two types, but I thought you might be interested in what Temple Grandin said about this. She sees autistic people on a continuum between what she calls Kanner/Asperger on one end, and Regressive/Epileptic on the other. Note that the neuroscience in the quotes I'm about to give is nearly two decades out of date or more in many cases. And the evidence for it actually being epilepsy may be slimmer than it looks to Temple Grandin. But anyway, here's the link to her whole article, and I've pasted the relevant parts (minus lengthy discussion of meds) into the white quote box just after the link:
http://www.autism-help.org/story-sensor ... cation.htm
1) Kanner/Asperger Types (named after the doctors who discovered Autism) (Kanner 1943 and Asperger 1944) and
2) the Epileptic/Regressive Types. Fragile X syndrome, Retts Syndrome, known fetal damage and damage due to high fevers are not included.
Both types probably have a strong genetic basis. Talks with parents indicate that they both have the same family history profile (Grandin 1992a). An interview with Margaret Bauman indicated that both types have the same pattern of brain abnormalities (Bauman 1991, and Bauman and Kemper 1994). During her autopsy studies, she examined both types. Possibly the different clinical symptoms between the two types can be explained in subtle variations of brain abnormality within the larger framework of a basic abnormality in the limbic system, hippocampus, amygdala, and cerebellum.
Kanner/Asperger type
Asperger's Syndrome is probably a milder type of traditional Kanner type high- functioning Autism. People with Asperger's syndrome can often function better in the community and have more normal speech and thinking patterns. Research by Bowler (et al. 1992) at the University of London indicates that they can solve a simple "Theory of Mind" problem that traditional high-functioning autistics fail. An example of Theory of Mind problem is: "Peter thinks that Jane thinks etc." Both the Kanner and Asperger types have deficits in flexible problem solving, facial recognition, and fine motor speed coordination. Testing at the University of Denver by Ozonoff (et al. 1991) indicates that both types do poorly on the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test which is a test of flexible problem solving. Most people with Autism are visual thinkers, but there are some people with Asperger's syndrome who are good with numbers and have poor visual skills.
Kanner/Asperger types can range from individuals with rigid thinking patterns and a relatively calm temperament to people with more normal thinking patterns with lots of anxiety and sensory sensitivity problems. Many of the individuals have flat affect. Charlie Hart's (1989) excellent book, Without Reason, describes examples of the first type and my book, Thinking in Pictures(1995), and Annabelle Stehli's (1991) book, Sound of a Miracle, describes the second type.
[...]
Regressive/Epileptic Type
These individuals often have more obvious neurological problems, and their ability to understand speech is often poor. Even though they may pass a standard pure tone hearing test, they may not be able to hear complex speech sounds. Some of them cannot follow a simple command like "put the book on your head." Volkmar and Cohen (1989) were the first researchers to identify the regressive or "late onset" form of Autism. Many of these children have signs of subtle epileptic seizure activity, such as staring and "spacing out." Some of these individuals may have sensory jumbling and mixing; whereas Kanner/Asperger Types have good receptive speech and can understand what people are saying. Regressives may just hear a jumble of noise. Sands and Ratey (1986) describe this as the concept of noise. Allen and Rapin 1993) state that children with autistic behavior that are totally mute, with no receptive speech, have to be introduced to language through the visual modality. Some of these children may learn to speak when they are taught to read.
Many regressive/epileptic children are labeled low functioning and have low IQ scores. Some may be ret*d, but others may receive a low-functioning label because their sensory processing problems make communication difficult.
[...]
Serious behavior problems sometimes occur at puberty and autistic teenagers and adults may have severe rage or aggression.
[...]
Outbursts of aggression in autistic teenagers and adults are sometimes caused by frontal or temporal lobe seizures. These seizures (epileptic episodes) are often difficult to detect on an EEG (Gedye 1989, 1991). Seizures should be suspected if the rages occur totally at random. Most other types of aggression or rage are usually triggered by some event such as frustration with communication, painful sensory stimuli or an unexpected change in routine.
[...]
EDUCATIONAL STRATEGIES AND SUBTYPES
A teaching and therapy program that worked well for me may be painful and confusing to some nonverbal lower functioning, regressive/epileptic people with Autism. My speech therapist forced me to look at her. I needed to be jerked out of my autistic world and kept engaged. Some children with more severe sensory problems may withdraw further because the intrusion completely overloads their immature nervous system. They will often respond best to gentler teaching methods such as whispering softly to the child in a room free of florescent lights and visual distractions. Donna Williams (1994) explained that forced eye contact caused her brain to shut down. She states when people spoke to her, "their words become a mumble jumble, their voices a pattern of sounds" (Painter 1992). She can use only one sensory channel at a time. If Donna is listening to somebody talk, she is unable to perceive a cat jumping up on her lap. If she attends to the cat, then speech perception is blocked. She realized a black thing was on her lap, but she did not recognize it as a cat until she stopped listening to her friend talk.
She explained that if she listens to the intonation of speech, she can't hear the words. Only one aspect of incoming input can be attended to at a time. If she is distracted by the visual input of somebody looking in her face, she can't hear them. Other people with Autism have explained that they had a difficult time determining that speech was used for communication. Kins, a man with Autism, further explained that if somebody looked him in the eye, "My mind went blank and thoughts stop; it was like a twilight state." Cesaroni and Garber (1991) also describe confusing and mixing of sensory channels. Jim, a man with Autism, explained, "Sometimes the channels get confused, as when sounds came through as color." He also said that touching the lower part of his face caused a sound- like sensation. Donna told me that she sometimes has difficulty determining where her body boundary is.
Cesaroni and Garber (1991) also noted problems with locating a tactile stimulus. The tendency of some autistic people to constantly touch themselves and objects around them may be an attempt to stabilize body and environmental boundaries. Therese Joliffe, an autistic woman, explained that it was easier to learn by touch because touch was her most accurate sense (Joliffe et al. 1992). Donna told me that sensory integration treatment, consisting of rubbing her skin with brushes, has helped. Even though she disliked the tactile input from the brushes, she reported that it helped her different sensory systems to work together and become more integrated. Her sensory processing also becomes more normal when she is relaxed and is focusing on only one sensory channel. Donna may be half way along the continuum between the Kanner/Asperger Type and the Regressive Epileptic Type.
PATTERNS OF NEUROLOGICAL ABNORMALITIES
Both Kanner/Asperger Types and the Regressive/Epileptic Types have abnormalities of the cerebellum (Bauman 1991, Bauman and Kemper 1994). Cerebellar abnormalities may explain the sound and touch sensitivity problems observed in most forms of Autism. Research on rats indicates that the vermis of the cerebellum modulates sensory input (Crispino and Bullock 1984). Stimulation of the cerebellum with an electrode will make a cat hypersensitive to both sound and touch (Chambers 1947). The cerebellum may act as a volume control for hearing, vision, and touch. Courchesne et al. (1988) found that many high-functioning Kanner/Asperger autistic people have abnormalities of the cerebellar vermis. Kanner/Asperger Types may also have a smaller than normal cerebellum. MRI scans of my own brain indicated my cerebellum is 20 percent smaller than normal; and an autistic computer genius with ultra classical Kanner Type Autism has a cerebellum that is 30 percent smaller than normal.
As discussed previously, the more severely impaired Regressive/Epileptic Type autistic people have much greater sensory processing problems. Most Kanner/Asperger Types do not experience sensory jumbling, and they can attend to simultaneous visual and auditory input. In more severe cases, such as Williams (1993) and Cesaroni and Garber (1991), sensations from the eyes and ears can mix together. Individuals with Autism process information very slowly, and they must be given time to respond. Nonverbal adults will process sensory input more slowly than verbal adults. Some individuals with very severe sensory processing problems may take several hours to recover after experiencing sensory overload. Gillingham (1995) contains an excellent review of autistic sensory problems. Parents often ask, ‘how can I tell how severe my child’s sensory problems are?’
Children and adults that have tantrums every time they go in a large supermarket or shopping mall usually have severe sensory processing problems. Children and adults who enjoy shopping in big stores usually have less severe sensory problems. The degree of sensory processing problems will vary greatly from case to case. It can vary from mild sound sensitivity to sensory jumbling and mixing. Lewis (1993) describes her son who may be mid-way between Kanner Type and Regressive/Epileptic Type. He does not have the rigid thinking of a typical Kanner Type, and he understands the give and take of conversations. However, he has signs of serious sensory processing problems, because he does self-stimulatory behaviors in nearly every sensory modality. Possibly, this may be due to brain stem abnormalities in addition to the cerebellar abnormalities. Hashimoto et al. (1992) found that low-functioning autistic people with low IQ scores had smaller brain stems. McClelland et al. (1992) also found that low-functioning individuals were more likely to have abnormal results on a central conduction time test, which is a measure of brain stem function.
McClelland et al. (1992) believe that autistic people have a defect in myelinization. This would account for the frequent occurrence of epilepsy and abnormal brain stem- evoked potentials in older autistic children. Myelin forms the fatty sheaths around neurons. It is like insulation on electrical wires. The lack of myelinization may also account for the mixing of sensory input from the eyes and ears and mind blank outs that occur when an autistic person becomes excited. The "space out" and jumbling may be due to miniature epileptic seizures that occur between the poorly myelinated neurons. Jim, one of the autistic people that Cesaroni and Garber (1991) interviewed, theorizes that certain frightening sounds can act as a trigger for disorganization of processing, similar to epileptic seizures that a flashing light can trigger.
Anyway although I think she's simplified stuff I have to admit in many ways I'd feel closest to the "Regressive/Epileptic" side than the other. I just doubt it's that simple.
_________________
"In my world it's a place of patterns and feel. In my world it's a haven for what is real. It's my world, nobody can steal it, but people like me, we live in the shadows." -Donna Williams
Verdandi
Veteran

Joined: 7 Dec 2010
Age: 55
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,275
Location: University of California Sunnydale (fictional location - Real location Olympia, WA)
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
job interview: utility worker |
12 Jun 2025, 6:49 pm |
Job interview: receptionist/ accounting clerk |
03 Jul 2025, 4:47 pm |
Have you been assaulted? ( as an adult) |
04 Jun 2025, 2:37 pm |
Anything wrong looking at children or young adult books? |
14 May 2025, 10:05 am |