What can I do about my possibly narcissistic hatred of socie

Page 3 of 4 [ 56 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

nemorosa
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Aug 2010
Age: 54
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,121
Location: Amongst the leaves.

27 Apr 2011, 1:04 pm

alexptrans wrote:
Living in a domed underwater city is gonna be great!


We can but dream. Will there be sharks with lasers? :bounce:



alexptrans
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 May 2010
Age: 183
Gender: Male
Posts: 878

27 Apr 2011, 1:13 pm

Yes! There's a blueprint already, the rest should be simple enough.

[img][800:695]http://fc05.deviantart.net/fs21/f/2007/253/8/8/Laser_Shark_by_McGibs.jpg[/img]



kfisherx
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Nov 2010
Age: 62
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,192

27 Apr 2011, 1:14 pm

nemorosa wrote:
kfisherx wrote:
You seem to really be against anyone who is a billionare... what about millionaires? Are all those people also "bad" in your book? Or is it the case that you presonally know these people or that you know they take less than contribute or....?

Just trying to understand what this disdain is for people who have wealth and where the line is here. Is there a line? It seems to be fairly common amongst the Adult AS folks I have recently befriended as well and I really don't get it at all.


Correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems that expressing dissatisfaction with the status quo is tantamount to declaring oneself a thieving commie free-loader in your eyes.

I didn't say those people were "bad" only that I really don't understand why they are motivated by the endless acquisition of more things and pointlessly ostentatious displays of wealth. I just don't happen to share those motivators, nor the jostling for status and influence. Those things are beyond my comprehension.

I'm just trying to explain a disconnect between my way of thinking and what I see in the world around me. It's not about billionaires are "bad", millionaires are "good" or anything like that.


I really don't understand not that I am projecting judgement. You said this statement...

nemorosa wrote:
.... Do we really need the Larry Ellison's of this world with their enormous penis extensions locked forever in one-upmanship with Paul Allen and the Oil Sheiks?


I am very literal so saw an interesting image and then took that to mean that you think that all of these people are trying to prove who has a bigger dick which equates to being a "bad" person in my book. I honestly do not understand the whole stigma around the penis so just use that anology to mean "bad". (guess that is black/white sort of thing)

You make this claim about these people...

"pointlessly ostentatious displays of wealth..... "

Personally, I am not bothered by the ways in which people spend their money and trying to understand why you make these claims RE these people. Why do you judge how they spend the money that they make or is this not a judgement statement?

Just trying to understand this mentality as I really am so socially clueless that even doing this escapes me. Yet, I think it would benefit me to understand it as I am in the very top % of earners in the world.



swbluto
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Feb 2011
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,899
Location: In the Andes, counting the stars and wondering if one of them is home to another civilization

27 Apr 2011, 1:15 pm

bumble wrote:
Society is very annoying sometimes and it seems to refuse to see my potential just because I am socially awkward.


Damn straight. Whenever you manifest any personal qualities that society deems as "undesireable"(Especially as it relates to social awkwardness or ability), your objective abilities and accomplishments are often overlooked in their assessment of your "ability" and "contribution". I can't tell you how many complex projects I've completed on my own that the majority of my peers are simply incapable of, just to be graded as a "failure" in a project by my team where I had more than contributed my fair share of the work(Especially more than them!), simply because they and other critical people disliked me, for reasons that I don't understand. I'm assuming it has to do with "social awkwardness"...

(Or maybe it's for not entirely-well-hidden feelings of superiority, hardy har har.)



Burzum
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Apr 2011
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,205

27 Apr 2011, 1:15 pm

We will have an army of robotic laser sharks, eh?



swbluto
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Feb 2011
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,899
Location: In the Andes, counting the stars and wondering if one of them is home to another civilization

27 Apr 2011, 1:17 pm

alexptrans wrote:
draelynn wrote:
alexptrans wrote:
Burzum wrote:
Iceland is an island, let's all move there. :D


Svalbard is an archipelago and it has polar bears. It therefore beats Iceland.


both wil lbe mostly underwater when the ice caps melt... :(


Living in a domed underwater city is gonna be great!


I want to live in a tourist space colony that's touring the universe at light speed.



kfisherx
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Nov 2010
Age: 62
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,192

27 Apr 2011, 1:25 pm

draelynn wrote:
I've noticed on this forum that many of we adult Aspies, either dxed or self dxed later in life, seem to have a level of success in life that those twenty years behind us find incomprehensible. Marriage, families, careers... I'm not so sure they feel entitled in as much as they have been told that they couldn't possibly do it. How much of that is belief programmed by professionals that severely underestimated their potential and trained their parents and them into these lowly expectations?.....


I've often thought the same thing but am still learning so much so do not really know. It is a "spectrum" and many of us who are older and making it may just be on a different level. idk at this time. I do know that I am mentoring a 13-year-old kid and before he met me he did feel like he was doomed to be a failure due to his disability. From what I can tell, we have the ability to DX these kids but the expertise to actually grow them is still not there. This kid has a world of resources available to him. He has a psychologist, a psychiatrist, a speech paathologist, a personal aid for all his class rooms, etc..... etc.... Yet when I visited his school recently to teach in his classroom I discovered that this kid did not have basic needs met like a private or quiet place to eat lunch... (sigh....) I mean really people???! ! I am also working very closely with the local adult Aspergers people in my town to try to understand what makes some able to cope and others not so much... My guess is that it has more to do with co-morbid issues than just about anything else but that is just a theory right now. I know that if I can keep my anxiety to a low rumble that I can actually do some degree of coping. Without that though, I can really fall apart. I don't think there is an "easy" answer but I really am motivated to get "into" the minds of people like the OP and others on this thread who feel so vicitmized in life...



bee33
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Apr 2008
Age: 62
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,862

27 Apr 2011, 1:59 pm

kfisherx wrote:
You make this claim about these people...

"pointlessly ostentatious displays of wealth..... "

Personally, I am not bothered by the ways in which people spend their money and trying to understand why you make these claims RE these people. Why do you judge how they spend the money that they make or is this not a judgement statement?

For me, it's a political and social justice issue. 3 billion people live in desperate poverty, and of those 1 billion don't even have enough food, that's why I personally consider ostentatious displays of wealth to be in very poor taste.

You seem to believe that the world is a meritocracy and those who deserve it or work hard enough will rise to the top, but that is not the case. Even though I gather from your posts that you have worked very hard to be where you are and have faced significant adversity, you also said that you are gifted which is just that: a gift. Not everyone is born gifted, and even if everyone was, the economic system requires that many live in poverty or work for slave wages to supply the resources to those at the top. There are many people who work just as hard as you do and yet are stuck in abject poverty. Those who are extremely wealthy have for the most part not worked for their wealth, certainly not to the extent that their wealth is merited. Unless they are willing to share what they have, then I don't see them as pulling their weight and yes, I do pass judgment on their McMansions and gas-guzzling cars, which I consider to be ostentatious displays of inequality and injustice.



Burzum
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Apr 2011
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,205

27 Apr 2011, 2:17 pm

bee33 wrote:
For me, it's a political and social justice issue. 3 billion people live in desperate poverty, and of those 1 billion don't even have enough food, that's why I personally consider ostentatious displays of wealth to be in very poor taste.

Those people live under oppressive regimes that inhibit free trade.

I think it would be a very rare thing indeed to find someone dying of starvation in a first world, predominantly capitalist nation.



kfisherx
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Nov 2010
Age: 62
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,192

27 Apr 2011, 2:21 pm

bee33 wrote:
kfisherx wrote:
You make this claim about these people...

"pointlessly ostentatious displays of wealth..... "

Personally, I am not bothered by the ways in which people spend their money and trying to understand why you make these claims RE these people. Why do you judge how they spend the money that they make or is this not a judgement statement?

For me, it's a political and social justice issue. 3 billion people live in desperate poverty, and of those 1 billion don't even have enough food, that's why I personally consider ostentatious displays of wealth to be in very poor taste.

You seem to believe that the world is a meritocracy and those who deserve it or work hard enough will rise to the top, but that is not the case. Even though I gather from your posts that you have worked very hard to be where you are and have faced significant adversity, you also said that you are gifted which is just that: a gift. Not everyone is born gifted, and even if everyone was, the economic system requires that many live in poverty or work for slave wages to supply the resources to those at the top. There are many people who work just as hard as you do and yet are stuck in abject poverty. Those who are extremely wealthy have for the most part not worked for their wealth, certainly not to the extent that their wealth is merited. Unless they are willing to share what they have, then I don't see them as pulling their weight and yes, I do pass judgment on their McMansions and gas-guzzling cars, which I consider to be ostentatious displays of inequality and injustice.


Huh.... So where is the "line" drawn? Is my new Volvo considered an "ostentatious display of wealth"? What about the 100K sports car that I paid cash for awhile ago? Having several homes? I really am trying to find where the "line" here is in your mind and so far am not seeing it being stated in any way that makes sense to me. Why would you make exceptions for me when you generalize others with wealth as "not worthy" of their salaries? Andy Grove came from poverty just as I did. Many of use come from quite humble beginnings and many of us have worked years and years at 50-80 hour work weeks to get to where we have the luxury of working 40-50. My point being that every single person I have ever met in high tech who is a milllionare today has really busted their asses to get there. Guess my personal experiences are very different from yours and am interested how you came to the conclusions that you ahve RE people of wealth.

I get lumped quite often enough in this sort of gropu and am wondering why and how this happens. The thing is that even though I have great wealth I also return it many times over to my community and to individuals. In my industry, we are taught gratitude and to care about our communities. This is also true of people like Bill Gates who taught me as a young engineer that "with great wealth comes great responsibility". There are many, many things in my area such as art projects, programs at schools, medical facilities for poor, etc that is a direct result of these multi-million dollar earners returning to society and their communities. Yet instead of any sort of gratitude for these programs they called out a having "penis extensions" etc. ??? Trying to understand what it is that we should do differently and if I am even part of the "we" to which you refer..... :?



Last edited by kfisherx on 27 Apr 2011, 2:31 pm, edited 2 times in total.

bee33
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Apr 2008
Age: 62
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,862

27 Apr 2011, 2:22 pm

Burzum wrote:
bee33 wrote:
For me, it's a political and social justice issue. 3 billion people live in desperate poverty, and of those 1 billion don't even have enough food, that's why I personally consider ostentatious displays of wealth to be in very poor taste.

Those people live under oppressive regimes that inhibit free trade.

I think it would be a very rare thing indeed to find someone dying of starvation in a first world, predominantly capitalist nation.
Free trade is a problem, not a solution. If people were able to move freely in the same way that capital is, they would be able to move to places where wages are higher. I'm not however, going to debate this issue here any further.



Burzum
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Apr 2011
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,205

27 Apr 2011, 2:29 pm

bee33 wrote:
If people were able to move freely in the same way that capital is, they would be able to move to places where wages are higher.

That has nothing to do with free trade...?

bee33 wrote:
I'm not however, going to debate this issue here any further.

Then why bring it up?



bee33
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Apr 2008
Age: 62
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,862

27 Apr 2011, 3:00 pm

kfisherx wrote:
bee33 wrote:
kfisherx wrote:
You make this claim about these people...

"pointlessly ostentatious displays of wealth..... "

Personally, I am not bothered by the ways in which people spend their money and trying to understand why you make these claims RE these people. Why do you judge how they spend the money that they make or is this not a judgement statement?

For me, it's a political and social justice issue. 3 billion people live in desperate poverty, and of those 1 billion don't even have enough food, that's why I personally consider ostentatious displays of wealth to be in very poor taste.

You seem to believe that the world is a meritocracy and those who deserve it or work hard enough will rise to the top, but that is not the case. Even though I gather from your posts that you have worked very hard to be where you are and have faced significant adversity, you also said that you are gifted which is just that: a gift. Not everyone is born gifted, and even if everyone was, the economic system requires that many live in poverty or work for slave wages to supply the resources to those at the top. There are many people who work just as hard as you do and yet are stuck in abject poverty. Those who are extremely wealthy have for the most part not worked for their wealth, certainly not to the extent that their wealth is merited. Unless they are willing to share what they have, then I don't see them as pulling their weight and yes, I do pass judgment on their McMansions and gas-guzzling cars, which I consider to be ostentatious displays of inequality and injustice.


Huh.... So where is the "line" drawn? Is my new Volvo considered an "ostentatious display of wealth"? What about the 100K sports car that I paid cash for awhile ago? Having several homes? I really am trying to find where the "line" here is in your mind and so far am not seeing it being stated in any way that makes sense to me. Why would you make exceptions for me when you generalize others with wealth as "not worthy" of their salaries? Andy Grove came from poverty just as I did. Many of use come from quite humble beginnings and many of us have worked years and years at 50-80 hour work weeks to get to where we have the luxury of working 40-50. My point being that every single person I have ever met in high tech who is a milllionare today has really busted their asses to get there. Guess my personal experiences are very different from yours and am interested how you came to the conclusions that you ahve RE people of wealth.

I get lumped quite often enough in this sort of gropu and am wondering why and how this happens. The thing is that even though I have great wealth I also return it many times over to my community and to individuals. In my industry, we are taught gratitude and to care about our communities. This is also true of people like Bill Gates who taught me as a young engineer that "with great wealth comes great responsibility". There are many, many things in my area such as art projects, programs at schools, medical facilities for poor, etc that is a direct result of these multi-million dollar earners returning to society and their communities. Yet instead of any sort of gratitude for these programs they called out a having "penis extensions" etc. ??? Trying to understand what it is that we should do differently and if I am even part of the "we" to which you refer..... :?

When I wrote about people who have not earned their wealth, I was referring to those who have made their money through investing and speculation and not through work, but more broadly, even those who have earned their wealth through hard work have not worked hundreds of times harder than those who toil for low wages, yet their wealth is in some cases hundreds of times higher. Janitors, food service workers, etc. work just as hard but for much lower returns.

Even when the wealthy give back to charity, they are in most cases draining more from the system than they are giving back. And I mean that in a very broad sense, because the system is set up in such a way that the worker bees at the bottom of the pyramid create much greater wealth than they receive in return, and that wealth is siphoned off at the top. (Not intentionally by people like yourself, or myself -- I was raised in a not wealthy but comfortable family -- but we benefit from the work and natural resources taken from others.)

I am not specifically exempting you from this, nor am I blaming you, because my feelings are not directed at individuals, but at the broader system. If I didn't know you and saw your 100K car, it would not sit well with me, but I still don't think that it would be my place to tell you as an individual what kind of car you should buy.
Burzum wrote:
bee33 wrote:
I'm not however, going to debate this issue here any further.

Then why bring it up?
I didn't bring up free trade, you did. I was just trying to answer kfisherx's question.



Burzum
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Apr 2011
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,205

27 Apr 2011, 3:10 pm

bee33 wrote:
I didn't bring up free trade, you did.


bee33 wrote:
Capitalism is a pyramid in which the many at the bottom have to toil to create wealth for the few at the top. It's an inherently unjust system, and very few (actually, none) of the people who are truly rich are rich because they worked thousands of times harder than those who have far less than they do. They are rich because they were able to exploit the labor and resources of others.



nemorosa
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Aug 2010
Age: 54
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,121
Location: Amongst the leaves.

27 Apr 2011, 3:20 pm

kfisherx wrote:
I am very literal so saw an interesting image and then took that to mean that you think that all of these people are trying to prove who has a bigger dick which equates to being a "bad" person in my book. I honestly do not understand the whole stigma around the penis so just use that anology to mean "bad". (guess that is black/white sort of thing)


Sorry I assumed you were aware of these

Perhaps the "penis extension" reference now makes some sense. These guys (and it is always men) build new super yachts in order to get a few feet ahead.

It makes no sense in a world full of such poverty. I quote from Wikipedia here:

"In the United States at the end of 2001, 10% of the population owned 71% of the wealth and the top 1% owned 38%. On the other hand, the bottom 40% owned less than 1% of the nation's wealth."

And that's the richest Nation. As bee33 pointed out, wealth accumulated isn't even necessarily related to how hard you have worked.

kfisherx wrote:
You make this claim about these people...

"pointlessly ostentatious displays of wealth..... "

Personally, I am not bothered by the ways in which people spend their money and trying to understand why you make these claims RE these people. Why do you judge how they spend the money that they make or is this not a judgement statement?

Just trying to understand this mentality as I really am so socially clueless that even doing this escapes me. Yet, I think it would benefit me to understand it as I am in the very top % of earners in the world.


Think about those yachts. I have no need of one and the bragging rights it brings. What would I do with one? What purpose do they serve?

It is strange to think I share the same planet with the likes of Abramovich, Ellison et al. They may as well be 3 winged lizards from the planet zog for all I understand them.



nemorosa
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Aug 2010
Age: 54
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,121
Location: Amongst the leaves.

27 Apr 2011, 3:38 pm

kfisherx wrote:
I really am motivated to get "into" the minds of people like the OP and others on this thread who feel so vicitmized in life...


I'm not sure who you think feels victimized here. I can only speak for myself of course, but I've enjoyed my own modest degree of success, such that I continue to support myself despite having not worked now for nearly 3 years. I've never had a problem working (except through recent ill health) but have nonetheless always held these views.

It's just that my primary drivers are not financial. I prefer intellectual rewards to trinkets and baubles.