introverts-guide-to-thinking-less-and-being-better
For me, and this is going to sound a bit psychoptathic most people think so, emotions are obsolete.
They get in the way for people to make the right decisions. And they don't try for the most realistic options. I'm logical to the point its suffocating. Facts, numbers, and organization is my game.
There are times when feelings pass through me of course. I'm not saying I don't feel I just look at emotions and people in a very very logical way.
I define emotion with logic.
edit: I realized that made no sense.
What I mean is that the way I feel emotion and empathize with people is in a very analtyical way.
Yes, this is probably the biggest reason this site is called Wrong Planet. It could just as easily be called Vulcan.
I absolutely agree you still have tone of voice in words. What I mean is that people mistake me for being mad when I'm not. Or being upset when I'm not. Or being sarcastic, when I'm not being either.
Here it seems I can clearly state what I need without alwyas being mistaken for another.
lol.
I agree that this is a good article.
When I was in high school, we were required to give a speech to the other people in our class about something.
I talked about my personality and introversion. The audience seemed to like it a lot, and the director of the school who is an introvert, listened to the speech and shook my hand and complimented me on it afterwards.
Yeah, I thought that was great! I think when I was younger I never used to go to the 'toilet'. I don't want to get too graphic in describing the kind of mess that causes.
Basically, I am very socially aware/empathetic to the point that it cripples my ability to be social. This actually causes me to appear sociopathic, because the feelings of others resonates so strongly with me that I am forced to turn it down, avoid it, or try to rationalize it away. I find this to be especially true when I watch the news. After listening to story after story of people suffering I just begin to see the news as one big joke intended to manipulate people's feelings (in some ways it is, but let's not get political). As a response I often take news stories very lightly to the point where this offends many people (especially, as you can imagine, stories about murder and war).
I think some autistics get to the point where their feelings are so strong for others that they need to rationalize it away or shut it down completely (they probably learn this from an early age, like in school where there is A LOT of different social dynamics being played out). That was my experience at least. However, that avoidance strategy didn't make me happy, so now I am finding ways to empathize with others more efficiently.
Yeah, that's one model that people are taking seriously. You do sound like you could very easily be mildly autistic. I think a lot of my favourite bloggers are.
That's pretty gosh darn cruel now I think about it. I didn't get on with school at all.
Maybe this thread bought up a couple things you can use?
I'm definitely interested in taking a look.
_________________
Not currently a moderator
When I was in high school, we were required to give a speech to the other people in our class about something.
I talked about my personality and introversion. The audience seemed to like it a lot, and the director of the school who is an introvert, listened to the speech and shook my hand and complimented me on it afterwards.
Cool!
Spread the good word.
_________________
Not currently a moderator
Sweetleaf
Veteran
Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 35,278
Location: Somewhere in Colorado
I thought you were severely depressed Sweetleaf, surely you don't enjoy all your thoughts? I can only assume. My own depression was accompanied (or perhaps caused?) by a lot of unpleasant thoughts.
A thought is only as good as its use value.
Well just because i am depressed does not mean I am always thinking depressed thoughts, I can be thinking about things I like and still feel depressed.
Hey guys, I'm the author of the article, and I definitely agree that my distinction between internal world and external world was a bit crude.
As an introvert, I certainly find myself very engaged with my surroundings, just not necessarily people. If I'm playing video games, or reading a book, or staring at the stars - sure I am doing these things in solitude - but they are all "external" things outside of my mind.
You guys are right that there is a bias that external = social. It is something I could've addressed in the article, but as you guys note, it can be a hard thing to explain to most people.
Cheers for taking the time to read and reply!
Mega-respect to you for being able to respond to criticism of your ideas without getting upset/taking it personally.
_________________
Music Theory 101: Cadences.
Authentic cadence: V-I
Plagal cadence: IV-I
Deceptive cadence: V- ANYTHING BUT I ! !! !
Beethoven cadence: V-I-V-I-V-V-V-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I
-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I! I! I! I I I
I thought you were severely depressed Sweetleaf, surely you don't enjoy all your thoughts? I can only assume. My own depression was accompanied (or perhaps caused?) by a lot of unpleasant thoughts.
A thought is only as good as its use value.
Well just because i am depressed does not mean I am always thinking depressed thoughts, I can be thinking about things I like and still feel depressed.
So you don't have unpleasant thoughts then?
All I'm saying is that thinking is not always a benign, wholesome, or useful activity. I'm not attacking thinking, I do it quite often. I recognise that many aspies hold thinking to be quite sacred. I also recognise when it's getting me into a state.
_________________
Not currently a moderator
I thought you were severely depressed Sweetleaf, surely you don't enjoy all your thoughts? I can only assume. My own depression was accompanied (or perhaps caused?) by a lot of unpleasant thoughts.
A thought is only as good as its use value.
Well just because i am depressed does not mean I am always thinking depressed thoughts, I can be thinking about things I like and still feel depressed.
So you don't have unpleasant thoughts then?
All I'm saying is that thinking is not always a benign, wholesome, or useful activity. I'm not attacking thinking, I do it quite often. I recognise that many aspies hold thinking to be quite sacred. I also recognise when it's getting me into a state.
I agree that over-thinking can be damaging and this is something I struggle with. However as an introvert with high intelligence I do seem to be aware of a certain prejudice in this extrovert-centric society against people who prefer "thinking" as opposed to "doing" in terms of gaining needed stimulation. I mean, it's just frustrating and counterproductive to have people telling me to be more like someone I'm not. I realize that my mind is wired in such a way as to not tolerate a vacuum and thus I need to focus on replacing negative ruminations with positive intellectual activity. Simply trying to rid my mind of thoughts just isn't a realistic approach, not even when I'm in the most relaxed meditative state possible, as I am always reflecting to some degree.
The more people give me advice that seems like forcing me to smash a square peg into a round hole the more I start to resent people and dismiss them as anti-intellectual fluff-brains who want to push nonsense and offer no real solutions for a person as unique as me. There just comes a point where the whole "positive psychology" thing feels like a counterproductive force that is pushing me deeper into depression and negative thinking on a whole. I guess on a whole there is just a part of me that resents being told how to think, feel, act, etc... in order to be more functional in an societal environment that just seems oppressive and soul-sucking.
I'm not really criticizing the article itself (though the title gives kind of a false impression). Just explaining why a lot of people struggle and get frustrated, or find it hard to even be open to certain advice in the first place. It is kind of a delicate issue I guess. Being totally closed to ideas on self-improvement is bad on the one end, but going on the assumption that things that work for other people will necessarily work for me and then running into a brick-wall of frustration is equally demoralizing and counterproductive.
Not trying to be overcritical or negative. Just saying that I can kind of feel the same frustration/resentment that Sweetleaf expressed in being told to "think less".
For me, and this is going to sound a bit psychoptathic most people think so, emotions are obsolete.
They get in the way for people to make the right decisions. And they don't try for the most realistic options. I'm logical to the point its suffocating. Facts, numbers, and organization is my game.
There are times when feelings pass through me of course. I'm not saying I don't feel I just look at emotions and people in a very very logical way.
I define emotion with logic.
edit: I realized that made no sense.
What I mean is that the way I feel emotion and empathize with people is in a very analtyical way.
Yes, this is probably the biggest reason this site is called Wrong Planet. It could just as easily be called Vulcan.
If I could live anywhere in any fictional environment, it would be Vulcan. They are such good people. And by the way that's an interesting article, although I somewhat happen to disagree with it for many other reasons posted here.
The more people give me advice that seems like forcing me to smash a square peg into a round hole the more I start to resent people and dismiss them as anti-intellectual fluff-brains who want to push nonsense and offer no real solutions for a person as unique as me. There just comes a point where the whole "positive psychology" thing feels like a counterproductive force that is pushing me deeper into depression and negative thinking on a whole. I guess on a whole there is just a part of me that resents being told how to think, feel, act, etc... in order to be more functional in an societal environment that just seems oppressive and soul-sucking.
I'm not really criticizing the article itself (though the title gives kind of a false impression). Just explaining why a lot of people struggle and get frustrated, or find it hard to even be open to certain advice in the first place. It is kind of a delicate issue I guess. Being totally closed to ideas on self-improvement is bad on the one end, but going on the assumption that things that work for other people will necessarily work for me and then running into a brick-wall of frustration is equally demoralizing and counterproductive.
Not trying to be overcritical or negative. Just saying that I can kind of feel the same frustration/resentment that Sweetleaf expressed in being told to "think less".
I agree with most of your concerns, when I read the headline today I cringe and I wrote it. In my opinion most people don't think enough, so it's not often I tell people to actually think LESS.
At the same time, over-thinking is a problem that both you and I admit to, and I believe it is something that can be worked on.
I also don't think my advice is a panacea for everyone, they are just suggestions. Positive psychology is about what works and what's real - it's a science. But it doesn't imply that everyone works the exact same way.
I thought I'd append this article to this thread... more intie/extie stuff, some stuff about aspies and culture... a bit of a heady one, but great insights here, I thought. Might help explain a few things.
http://www.ribbonfarm.com/2011/04/07/ex ... nd-codies/
I found these two lists particularly interesting.
require a minimum period of isolation every day to survive psychologically
are energized by weak-link social fields, such as coffee shops, where little interaction is expected
are energized by occasional, deeper 1:1 interactions, but still at arm’s length; no soul-baring
are energized by such 1:1 encounters with anyone, whether or not a prior relationship exists
are drained by strong-link social fields such as family gatherings
are reduced to near-panic by huddles: extremely close many-many encounters such as group hugs
have depth-limited relationships that reach their maximum depth very fast
need a minimum amount of physical contact everyday, even if it is just laying around with a pet
are energized by strong-link social fields such as family gatherings
like soul-baring 1:1 relationships characterized by swings between extreme intimacy and murderous enmity
are not willing to have 1:1 encounters with anyone unless they’ve been properly introduced into their social fields
are made restless and anxious by weak-link social fields such as coffee shops unless they go with a friend
are reduced to near panic by extended episodes of solitude
have relationships that gradually deepen over time to extreme levels
_________________
Not currently a moderator
Hey guys, I'm the author of the article, and I definitely agree that my distinction between internal world and external world was a bit crude.
As an introvert, I certainly find myself very engaged with my surroundings, just not necessarily people. If I'm playing video games, or reading a book, or staring at the stars - sure I am doing these things in solitude - but they are all "external" things outside of my mind.
You guys are right that there is a bias that external = social. It is something I could've addressed in the article, but as you guys note, it can be a hard thing to explain to most people.
Cheers for taking the time to read and reply!
Unlike other members of the forum, I tend to agrre with your definition of "introversion" - my impression is that many introverts (including me), not only avoid social contacts but also:
- are less interested in physical activities (like sports) than extroverts
- in school, are more interested in the more academic subject and less in the more "hands-on" subjects than extroverts
- are more self.absorbed with their own thoughts and more "innattentive"
- when they play computer games, prefer games with a component of "inner reflection" (like strategy or adventure) while extroverts prefer games more of reaction to "external stimulus" (like action games)
- iare more prone to consider reading (about, for example, a distant country)a reasonable proxy for real experience, while extroverts are more prone to experiment things in reality
- and, sometimes, some introverts have almost an "imaginary social life" prefering that to the "real social life"(example - being totally in love with a girl, be always thinking in her, but loosing all the interests if the relation becomes real)
All these points indicate that at least some introverts have more a general lack of interest in the concrete, external, world than a mere like of interest in "social world" (the lack of interest in the "social world" is simply because "social world" belongs to the "concrete, external, world").
However, I am (according to MBTI typology) an "Introvert-iNtuitive"; perhaps I am mixing the introvert traits with the intuitive traits.
- in school, are more interested in the more academic subject and less in the more "hands-on" subjects than extroverts
- are more self.absorbed with their own thoughts and more "innattentive"
- when they play computer games, prefer games with a component of "inner reflection" (like strategy or adventure) while extroverts prefer games more of reaction to "external stimulus" (like action games)
- iare more prone to consider reading (about, for example, a distant country)a reasonable proxy for real experience, while extroverts are more prone to experiment things in reality
- and, sometimes, some introverts have almost an "imaginary social life" prefering that to the "real social life"(example - being totally in love with a girl, be always thinking in her, but loosing all the interests if the relation becomes real)
I can relate to all of these. Related to your last point, I find I sympathize/empathize more with fictional chararacters in movies than I do in real life. People dying in real life even close to me don't upset me as much as someone dying in a movie, etc. I'm not sure why.
