Coming from someone who is wrong as much as you are in this post, your judgemental confidence seems comical.
Gideon wrote:
More NTs make it into their 30s and are not just fine either. People fail but people did not fail just because they have AS. That is an excuse and a poor one at that.
Your statements here are not reasonable or accurate. Many have linked to sources which show that somewhere between 75% - 90% of all people with Asperger's never hold a "real" job. A significant percentage of those who do work are unable to build a career, or get a job that pays a living wage. This is
far different from employment stats for the general population. AS has a very high correlation with "failure." Saying it is merely an excuse does not make sense - especially when you are speaking of an "excuse" that didn't exist until many older folks had already "failed."
Gideon wrote:
If you are reading this and young don't listen to these people that tell you that you are wrong and inferior or that you are somehow broken. These people are out to make you a victim and you aren't.
I do agree that people reading this shouldn't feel that they are "broken," but I don't see people here as trying to make others think they are victims.
Gideon wrote:
Here is a list of what people are calling a disorder.
1. Higher than normal ability to focus your attention
True, but . . . usually accompanied by executive dysfunction which makes it very difficult, at best, to complete a task in a reasonable amount of time.
Gideon wrote:
2. Higher than normal sense of hearing
FALSE. Sensory issues are common but not required, so no. Also, for those who have issues, could just as easily be less sensitive.
Gideon wrote:
3. ability to see patterns where others can't
Generally true - although not diagnostically required, so no guarantee that a given person will have this ability.
Gideon wrote:
4. Higher than normal sense of touch
FALSE. Sensory issues are common but not required, so no. Also, for those who have issues, could just as easily be less sensitive.
Gideon wrote:
5. Heightened ability to taste
FALSE. Sensory issues are common but not required, so no. Also, for those who have issues, could just as easily be less sensitive.
Gideon wrote:
6. Often a higher ability to withstand temperature extremes
FALSE. Sensory issues are common but not required, so no. Also, for those who have issues, could just as easily be less sensitive.
Gideon wrote:
7. Higher than average intelligence
Technically true, but unimportant. Since the diagnostic criteria require "average or above" intelligence, the Bell curve for IQ is shifted slightly for Aspies. From what I have read (sorry, no cites) the "average" aspie is about 7 - 10 IQ points higher than the "average" person. This is NOT a significant difference. Also, there is very little correlation between high IQ and real-world success
Gideon wrote:
So don't listen to these people that tell you that you are somehow made wrong.
Perhaps you thought you were posting to the Autism Speaks message board? WP is mostly populated by folks who endorse the idea of neurodiversity - that ASDs are differences not disabilities. Recognizing that one's mind works differently is not the same as saying that it works incorrectly, nor is it saying that one cannot succeed because of it. To the contrary, recognizing these differences is essential if one is to take advantage of its strengths and find work-arounds for its deficits.