Do you lack gender bias because of AS?
It probably means that you don't have any religious bias. That can happen if you grew up in an environment with pretty much equal exposure to religions and secular worldviews, or more likely an environment that largely ignored religious matters.
I get the same result with the black and white IAT--smack in the middle, no bias either way. That makes sense, because I grew up in Germany until I was about six years old and simply didn't encounter any black people, nor was I taught any stereotypes about them. Then when I came to the US, one of my major first exposures to black people was neutral--my uncle was black and my cousins are biracial, and it never really made much difference because they are a military family and that defines them a lot more than race. Only once I was about twelve and my mom married a racist did I get exposed to anti-black prejudice, and by then I was too old to really internalize it.
I do have a strong anti-disability result on the IAT. That makes sense--my mother is strongly ablist, with a fear-and-pity approach to disability, and as a young child I was exposed to things like people with disabilities being talked about with pity, or being threatened with acquiring a disability myself if I did something dangerous.
I do have some minor tendency to think of young black men I don't know as being potentially a threat, but I think the same way of young white men that I don't know. Their race doesn't seem to be a factor so much as the mental image I have of men in their late teens and early twenties as being more "dangerous" than other groups. Statistically, this is true, but it is not a stereotype I agree with acting on. Most young men are not violent and it does them a disservice to lump them with the minority who are.
What I learned about prejudice in my social psychology class was interesting, though: Unprejudiced people are not the people who don't have internalized stereotypes. Like the prejudiced group, they will show biased results on the IAT. However, unlike the prejudiced group, they work to override their bias, monitoring themselves for biased actions and even biased thoughts. When you put unprejudiced people in an MRI machine, you can see their brains lighting up, working harder to counter the stereotypes they have internalized. So what the IAT measures is that internal stereotype--it doesn't measure your response to it.
_________________
Reports from a Resident Alien:
http://chaoticidealism.livejournal.com
Autism Memorial:
http://autism-memorial.livejournal.com
My household is profoundly mormon, though quite liberal. I've been exposed to many religions. My best friend in the 1st grade is muslim, giving me a positive view of muslims, I always looked to Hindu's with exotic admiration, I grew up in a neighborhood with a large jewish population ect. and I now I live in Indonesia. I remember I attended a Ramadan festival once, my parents also attended a Sikh one. I was finding it hard at first to put any religiously charged thing in the "negative" section. It anything I have a positive bias towards religion in general, and if atheists were included in the list the result might be different.
_________________
Cinnamon and sugary
Softly Spoken lies
You never know just how you look
Through other people's eyes
Autism FAQs http://www.wrongplanet.net/postt186115.html
Verdandi
Veteran

Joined: 7 Dec 2010
Age: 55
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,275
Location: University of California Sunnydale (fictional location - Real location Olympia, WA)
This usage really only goes back to the 1800s. Use of singular "they" as indeterminate gender goes back to Shakespeare and Chaucer (Chaucer being what, 14th century?) and thus probably even earlier than that. People seem to believe that English was always like this, but it really wasn't.
Well, a few things:
* There's no such thing as "a transgender." You really mean "a transgender person."
* Transgender is not a gender. It describes how some people experience conflict between their actual gender and the gender that was assigned to them at birth. Transgender people can be men, women, non-binary, genderqueer, agender, neutrois, etc.
Hence you read about trans men, trans women, genderqueer people, etc.
Singular "they" is grammatically valid and centuries old.
http://motivatedgrammar.wordpress.com/2 ... s-correct/
Although many people object to it because they're invested in what we have no and/or mistakenly believe that what we have now was always the case.
And even if it didn't have historical precedent, it would still be valid because languages change. After all, that's how masculine pronouns because the default for gender indeterminacy. This was not even a product of typical language evolution, but due to activism to "officially" change the language.
Verdandi
Veteran

Joined: 7 Dec 2010
Age: 55
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,275
Location: University of California Sunnydale (fictional location - Real location Olympia, WA)
- Males tend to be more physically competitive with each other, while females are more socially competitive
- Males tend to do better at focused thought, where females tend to be better at multitasking
- Males tend towards activities that involve hunter-type activities (physical or mental challenges, combat simulation, etc.), while females tend towards more nesting-type activities (decorating, home organization, etc.)
- Males are more visually focused in terms of attraction to a romantic partner, where as females tend to be focused on more underlying but equally instrumental traits, such as wealth and status of their partner.
Those are just a few examples of how men and women are generally different, but again I'm going to say there's outliers that are going to be exceptions to each of those generalities. So I'm not arguing that there's some females who have the masculine traits and some males who have feminine traits, I'm just saying there's a general pattern that's generally true most of the time, and means that males and females just aren't the same (but also neither is better or worse than the other).
I strongly recommend reading Cordelia Fine's Delusions of Gender for a critical analysis of this information.
None of the traits you listed are inherently "masculine" or "feminine." Masculinity and femininity are social constructions that are often assigned arbitrarily.
Yeah, I still have a lot of trouble with using singular "they" properly. It always feels awkward. I wish I could get a good grammar tutorial on it from somewhere. Usually I try to weasel out of it by using plurals; then "they" sounds fine. Or I cop out with s/he.
_________________
Reports from a Resident Alien:
http://chaoticidealism.livejournal.com
Autism Memorial:
http://autism-memorial.livejournal.com
Okay, instead of continuing to dump sexist BS in this thread, can you just say "I'm sexist" and leave? No one wants it here. I for one have just as many of the female traits as the male ones.
_________________
Cinnamon and sugary
Softly Spoken lies
You never know just how you look
Through other people's eyes
Autism FAQs http://www.wrongplanet.net/postt186115.html
Whilst I consider that Males & Females are Equal, my observations & experience in life has created my opinion that certain roles operate better (more efficiently) if they are carried out by a member of a specific gender.
As an example;
I consider that females make far better managers of a company/businness than males if staff confidence is to be sustained. Male managers usually (based upon my personal experience) tend to be focused on the product, meeting deadlines, pushing sales, encouraging competition between staff members to make more sales than another, etc. whereas Female managers are better at maintaining staff moral, & keeping the team working together as a whole.
It is just an observation from my own experience.
_________________
We, the people on the Autistic Spectrum have a choice.
We can either try to "fit in" with the rest of society, or we can be so egocentric that we can't be bothered.
I choose the actor. I observe NT's. I listen to their socializing. I practice it, so in social situations I can just emulate/mimic what is expected.
It isn't natural for me, but it enables me to "fit in".
It is VERY tiring and draining, but at least we can appear like them even though it is an act. Like being on the stage.
They can't see it is emulation, and so we are accepted.
Sounds very Karl Marx'ish, the problem is how others interpret it like Lenin... and they both happen to be the same type of personality.
Affirmative Action tries to address that, but it creates another unfair environment.
Verdandi
Veteran

Joined: 7 Dec 2010
Age: 55
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,275
Location: University of California Sunnydale (fictional location - Real location Olympia, WA)
Sounds very Karl Marx'ish, the problem is how others interpret it like Lenin... and they both happen to be the same type of personality.
Affirmative Action tries to address that, but it creates another unfair environment.
Citation needed.
I don't think that there is any real behavioral difference between genders. I often wonder how much gender bias affects the behavior of people who have them. If anything, if people ignored gender norms, many of them would be androgynous.
I have seen many people at my special school for people on the autistic spectrum try to conform to gender expectations, but it is noticeable when they are faking because of their stereotypic behavior. There are even classmates that act according to gender norms in social situations, but act like their opposite gender in the classroom.
After earning degrees in English and Cultural Anthropology, I can tell you that the singular use of "they" is not always accepted as grammatically correct in academia. On a casual basis it's fine, but plenty of professors and TA's will ding you for it. In most classes I had, students had to use either he, she, he/she, or she/he. The professors always told the class on the first day and wrote in the syllabus if students were required to avoid the use of the general "he," as was department policy. Most professors specifically told their classes to not use "they" in a singular context, but one or two stated it was OK because none of the accepted conventions are correct anyway. It seems like one of those things that depends on who you ask, and on which grammar book you read.
I find this whole topic to be inherently confusing.
What exactly is 'gender bias'?
Is it biased to note that there are physiological, hormonal, and mental differences, in general, between the two biological genders?
If so, I suppose I'm biased, because I'm aware of those differences, and in general that awareness has proven fairly helpful in terms of anticipating the parameters of interactions with a person of a particular biological gender.
However, I'm also aware that those differences are not absolute and that there is certainly a large amount of room for deviation from the norm, especially in terms of brain structure, and that awareness allows me to adjust my perception of a particular individual based on their own identification and general interaction style if it deviates significantly from the norm for their particular biological gender.
So in that way, I'm not really biased.
I do my best to treat and react to everyone as equally as possible, at least in terms of their gender, although being an (unfortunately) heterosexual male sometimes I will treat and react to women I perceive to be attractive differently than others, even though I might rather not do so.
Damned hormones.
Am I gender biased?
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Gender in Bio? |
04 Jul 2025, 2:35 pm |
What does feeling a certain gender even mean? |
04 Jul 2025, 6:37 pm |
I lack talent but I love music |
12 Jul 2025, 7:12 am |