Sweetleaf wrote:
Sethno wrote:
cavernio wrote:
Sethno wrote:
DevilKisses wrote:
Or do you think "laziness" is just executive dysfunction or fatigue?
There are lazy people.
That doesn't mean that you can easily tell the difference, tho.
Innocent people can be wrongly called "lazy".
So what separates these groups? How could you tell? What's the difference in mentality? That's the meat of the question, that's what I want to know! If there is a difference as you say surely you can at least partially describe it.

Someone who could do more but doesn't, a loafer, would be lazy.
One example would be someone who is on welfare, and makes no effort to become self-supporting. This would be compared to someone who struggles over a period of time to work and just doesn't have the mental or physical assets needed to be self supporting. One isn't trying. The other is trying, even if they're failing.
But then the problem is who decides if someone is making an effort or not? Also depending on ones reason for being on welfare, being 'self-supporting' might not be a realistic goal so it wouldn't make much sense for them to put effort into that, or some people need to have treatment for their issue before they can start focusing on be coming self supporting. So I guess the point is there could be a reason for them not putting effort into that besides laziness.
I spoke not of others being able to tell. I spoke of what the differences are, and THAT is what this thread is about. IS there such a thing as being lazy? Yes, there is.
Done and done.
If you'd like a method of figuring out who is doing their best and who isn't, I'd suggest you invent a mind-reading machine, because that seems to be the only way you'd know for sure.
_________________
AQ 31
Your Aspie score: 100 of 200 / Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 101 of 200
You seem to have both Aspie and neurotypical traits
What would these results mean? Been told here I must be a "half pint".