jbw wrote:
I think everyone relies on an innate belief system that is generated by the personal experience of life, which shapes our interpretations of the events that we perceive. Whether such a belief system is labeled God or something else does not matter.
It is however easy to confuse labels used by others with a seemingly corresponding concept in one's own mind. Debates about perceived conceptual mismatches between belief systems are the source of many unnecessary conflicts.
...
Any conscious mind makes use of recursive representations. This means our minds are capable of generating simulations of our own mind and simulations of other minds, one of which we may label God. All these simulations are inevitably biased by our experiences and perceptions, but no one from the outside is qualified to pass any judgement on our personal mind simulations, because firstly they can not experience our private simulations first hand with high fidelity, and secondly, their experiences do not match our own, so a divergence in the interpretation of the simulation is inevitable.
...
Awiddershinlife wrote:
It is fascinating how a species with metacognition deals with this singual reality. I demand that every moment of my meaningless life is spent in a positive frame of mind. Many of us struggle with depression. I refuse to accept depression as acceptable. My God and I reject it. I am going to enjoy my life. God helps me accomplish this through many travails.
This is a very healthy attitude. My belief system is based on a "force of life", specifically the belief that the notion of life, covering all living creatures, is positive and "worthwhile" (whatever that means

) to experience.
I was thinking that I would either have to avoid this altogether or write a very long post, but you already pretty much covered it. It is a very pleasant surprise to find someone expressing views so congruent with my own. Most people, religious and atheist alike, are intolerant of this sort or reality-based approach.
I take elements of Christian, Buddhist and Taoist thinking and use them freely in my personal religion. It's outward form is mostly Christian, but with detail that most Christians find heretical. My God is more of the "ground of being" variety and not a being. I take the single most important statement of the Gospels to be "I am the truth" and extended that to that which is true is God. Reality is the first and greatest testament, all scriptural and cultural claims which are counter to observable reality are obviously cultural works and must be viewed as either poetic and metaphorical or simple error.
I am sure I don't know a great deal about reality, but I am sure that there is no god who cares about the way you wear your hair or when and what type of hat you wear.
Monty Python got most of it right in "The Meaning of Life."