iliketrees wrote:
Girl_Kitten wrote:
Impairment is not the same thing as "causing significant distress" and "mutually exclusive to living a happy, comfortable life". Women could be considered "impaired" because we lose a significant amount of blood monthly, and need to take time off of work to give birth and breastfeed babies. That doesn't mean you can't be happy as a woman who has a period, and women can certainly be happy about giving birth and breastfeeding. Gay people can be considered "impaired" because they cannot procreate with their spouse without medical intervention. That doesn't mean that gay people can't be happy having gay sex and adopting children. Impairment just means that you can't (or don't) function the way that white, Protestant, wealthy, heterosexual, NT men think you should, and that is the definition of "impairment" that the APA has traditionally used.
Men could be considered impaired as they have lower life spans and external organs highly susceptible to pain.
Straights could be considered impaired as they run the risk of accidental pregnancy.
So women vs men and straights vs gays are at an equal in terms of advantages and disadvantages. This is nowhere near the case for autistic vs NT.
I am not living a happy and comfortable life. And no, I do not have depression. I am just autistic. The impairment causes distress in a lot of people.
This is ridiculous, you don't know what you are talking about. Genetically men actually have more longevity than women, the reason that women have longer life spans is because men are more likely to do something which will get them killed like go to war. And giving a few random examples doesn't make people equal in terms of advantages and disadvantages, you can't quantify such thing. There are plenty of advantages to being autistic as well which you neglected to mention.
"The impairment causes distress in a lot of people." So does being gay. What is or is not a disorder depends on social context on what is normal functioning. If procreating through natural means is seen as important, than homosexuality is in fact a disorder, and being PC isn't going to change that. You do realize it was classified as a disorder in the past? The reason that changed is not because of a fundamental difference in understanding of homosexuality, but because of a change in social mores.