Baren-Cohen Systemising Empathising Test

Page 3 of 3 [ 42 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3


Baren-Cohen
I think Baren-Cohen is the sexiest man alive!! ! 7%  7%  [ 3 ]
I think Baren-Cohen is the sexiest man alive!! ! 7%  7%  [ 3 ]
These tests of his are inaccurate... 21%  21%  [ 9 ]
These tests of his are inaccurate... 21%  21%  [ 9 ]
Who the hell is this Baren-Cohen guy anways??? 12%  12%  [ 5 ]
Who the hell is this Baren-Cohen guy anways??? 12%  12%  [ 5 ]
Why are you asking me such silly questions??? 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
Why are you asking me such silly questions??? 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
I've never taken a test before in my life and I'm not starting now. 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
I've never taken a test before in my life and I'm not starting now. 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
Don't know. Don't care. Can I go back to my cave now? 7%  7%  [ 3 ]
Don't know. Don't care. Can I go back to my cave now? 7%  7%  [ 3 ]
I think Baren-Cohen is a crock of excrement. Bah! 2%  2%  [ 1 ]
I think Baren-Cohen is a crock of excrement. Bah! 2%  2%  [ 1 ]
Total votes : 42

gwynfryn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Aug 2004
Gender: Male
Posts: 740
Location: France

25 Jul 2005, 5:02 pm

anbuend wrote:
I find the Baron-Cohen tests overly simplistic, but also the other one being discussed.


I find myself at a loss. The anbuend I knew was familiar with that "other" test, and had studied it intensively (and yes, I can produce archives, but does anyone care?)



adversarial
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Jul 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 549

25 Jul 2005, 6:03 pm

On this latest one, I got 'NAE', which means what, precisely?

On EQ I got 6, on SQ I got 45 and on AQ, I got a rather surprising 48. On the Apie-Quiz, I got 143, though taking it later, I seemed to increase my score to 158 (reduced inhibitions or 'wishful' thinking, I am not sure).

Of course, this could all be moot - I constantly entertain the notion that I am in reality a disaffected NT who is looking to find a 'rationalisation' for his own sociophathic, bpd/npd condition at all costs.

When it comes to things like this, I often think that the less 'extreme' answer (ie the one that requires the minimal paradigm shift), is of necessity the preferred option.

Then I read what people have written who definitely do have AS and compare it to my own life, and suddenly things seem to 'click' together - or is that just me 'passing the buck' - ie avoiding 'taking responsibilty' and merely being a dysfunctional personality?

The antecedant 'backstory' of a career in the bowels of the 'psychodynamic' and 'psychotherapeutic' framework still exerts a hold over me (which is why I still foreground thoughts that my thinking I might have AS is nowt but escapist fantasy and absconding from responsibility on my part). I find to my surprise, after researching the internet, that my old Therapeutic Community are still citing Bruno Bettelheim as a serious source text for engaging with the theoretical framework that they held so dear, as well as being a legitimate therapeutic model for 'dealing with' 'autistic behaviours', of which I was once accused of having..



DeepThought
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Jun 2004
Age: 58
Gender: Male
Posts: 574
Location: VA

27 Jul 2005, 10:51 am

My scores.

Empathy Quotient: 7
Systemizing Quotient: 60


_________________
The Rhymin' Red Rover, that's what they call me,
Too old for a sailin', too young fo' the sea;
Set sail fo' a sunset, to a land that is free,
I'm the Rhymin' Red Rover, and that's where I'll be.


Nicolai
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 23 Jul 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 174
Location: Europe

27 Jul 2005, 11:29 am

EQ 13
SQ 43



jennyfreckles
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jul 2005
Gender: Female
Posts: 57
Location: scotland

27 Jul 2005, 11:41 am

EQ-7 SQ-36 half the questions did not apply to me 8O i got AE on the other test.



Last edited by jennyfreckles on 27 Jul 2005, 6:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.

nayashi
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 28 Aug 2004
Gender: Female
Posts: 330

27 Jul 2005, 11:46 am

Bah! It asks too many questions! I gave up after 50.


_________________
instincts are misleading/you shouldn't think what you're feeling


ashkelon
Raven
Raven

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jun 2005
Gender: Female
Posts: 100
Location: Iowa USA

27 Jul 2005, 12:09 pm

EQ = 19
SQ = 68

Who doesn't wonder about the mechanics of things? Bah. I like the "almost no women score this high" text.

I did.

Maybe that's why I keep getting called "unnatural" by management.

I just got told I should be more "upbeat" and "perky". And more eye contact too.

Gah.



Nicolai
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 23 Jul 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 174
Location: Europe

27 Jul 2005, 12:11 pm

Problem with this test is:

You can fill in the answers as honest as possible (like I did) or if you like to be AS and you are a little systemising, you easily can pick out the aspie-like answers.
You´ll have to be a completely non-systemising NT not to understand which answers are aspie-like answers and which are not.



adversarial
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Jul 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 549

27 Jul 2005, 12:25 pm

Nicolai wrote:
Problem with this test is:

You can fill in the answers as honest as possible (like I did) or if you like to be AS and you are a little systemising, you easily can pick out the aspie-like answers.
You´ll have to be a completely non-systemising NT not to understand which answers are aspie-like answers and which are not.


Very true. Which is why tests such as these are for 'amusement' or casual interest only, rather than tools for diagnosis.

Having said that though, even I was pulled up on 'lack of eye contact' by a tutor on my training course today. He put it down to 'self-confidence issues' and who am I to argue with him on that? Even if I were proven to be AS/ASD, it is unlikely that I would announce it to many people except my brother.



IronSails
Butterfly
Butterfly

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jul 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 17

27 Jul 2005, 12:56 pm

I scored 24 on the EQ and 40 on the SQ tests.

I also am a HDA type.

Pyraxis wrote this in another thread and it fits me perfectly.

Quote:
On one hand, I'm very easily aroused, oversensitive to emotion in both myself and others. I find myself reflecting the ambience of most environments I enter, and conforming my speech and behavior patterns to it. This is something I work hard to prevent but seem to have far more difficulty with than others. In a debate, I'll more often than not find myself seeing the other person's view more clearly than my own - as they talk, I'll start thinking how they're making perfect sense, then my mind will start coming up with justifications why what they're saying must be right, and I'll end up agreeing - then afterwards, alone, it'll be What in the world was I thinking???

On the other hand, I inhibit emotional response unless I'm with someone I trust. This goes for both positive and negative - if I feel myself getting a little out of control, I just freeze and go quiet. So to most people it seems like I don't get aroused, and I used to be accused of not feeling anything. But if you know me, you can look close and see the signs.